[12:18] <schopin> coreycb: hi! is there any specific reason why networkx hasn't been merged from Debian? The current version has some issues with the new numpy
[12:51] <cpaelzer_> Is there a reason I fail to see in this? src:acpid builds bin:acpid - both source and binary are in main. But seeded-in-ubuntu reports them as not seeded.
[12:52] <cpaelzer_> I found that it is indeed not listed in http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ubuntu-seeded-packages/seeded.json.gz which is what seeded-in-ubuntu uses
[12:52] <cpaelzer_> I wondered if it might be due to being Essential, but it isn't
[12:53] <cpaelzer_> I think I can get around my current issue by falling back to rmadison and co, but now that I know I'd like to understand why it is missing
=== esembee_ is now known as esembee
[16:59] <rbasak> juliank: re: ubuntu-devel@ post, probably you should link to the spec if you're relying on it?
[17:03] <juliank> true
[17:04] <juliank> rbasak: it's https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/spec-apt-deb822-sources-by-default/29333, I sent a followup
[17:32] <vorlon> bluesabre: incidentally there's a couple of merge requests from me on the xubuntu seeds, to drop references to packages that Debian has declared obsolete and removed from their archive - looking for confirmation that this is correct rather than just butchering your seeds
[17:34] <vorlon> bluesabre: as far as the problem you're having, I think the issue is that seed names need to be unique across (flavor,platform)
[17:34] <vorlon> bluesabre: so you need to call the minimal /seed/ something else (xminimal?)
[18:15] <Laibsch> GunnarHj: have *both* your questions been answered?  or just the one with regards to poetry?
[18:18] <GunnarHj> Laibsch: Poetry is fine (I misunderstood the nature of the latest Debian changes). But I still wonder why it's motivated to SRU apt-avahi-discover only because of a Python deprecation warning.
[18:19] <Laibsch> that is also a misunderstanding
[18:19] <GunnarHj> How?
[18:19] <Laibsch> there is no push to SRU.  I am simply using jammy and consuming my own dogfood.
[18:20] <Laibsch> while doing that I found an issue that I assume also affects lunar.  in fact, it seems the changes upstream to move from asyncore to asyncio are faulty/not complete.
[18:20] <Laibsch> thus, I reopened the ticket and marked it as introducing a regression.  but I have not verified it in lunar, yet.
[18:22] <GunnarHj> Laibsch: Thanks for explaining. I saw jammy, and I saw a comment on the bug report about SRUing. But now I understand that that's not what you are doing. Then all is fine, I suppose. :)
[18:26] <GunnarHj> Laibsch: Btw, maybe you should try it on lunar also, where python has recently been upgraded to 3.11.
[18:32] <Laibsch> I'm hoping somebody else can do that, to verify my hunch
[18:32] <Laibsch> I currently do not have the ressources to do so
[18:35] <GunnarHj> Laibsch: I can run that script in lunar later, if you like.
[18:48] <Laibsch> GunnarHj: that would be much appreciated
[18:49] <Laibsch> make sure you have the latest package of squid-deb-proxy-client
[18:50] <Laibsch> but you also need an inactive instance of apt-cacher-ng running on the same machine to trigger the bug
[18:51] <Laibsch> "sudo apt install apt-cacher-ng squid-deb-proxy-client;sudo service apt-cacher-ng stop;/usr/share/squid-deb-proxy-client/apt-avahi-discover" should trigger the bug, I believe
[20:00] <rbasak> juliank: thanks!
[20:02] <juliank> tianon is very eager to get going and has been bugging me for months