| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.6] | 02:34 | |
| RAOF | Eickmeyer: WRT digikam #2000490 - how much effort would it be to include the test data in the package? | 04:55 |
|---|---|---|
| Eickmeyer | RAOF: I mean, it's a git repository on its own. The test data was in the package until the upstream devs arbitrarily decided to remove it prior to beta release. | 05:06 |
| Eickmeyer | Their entire make script calls "git clone" to get it. >.< | 05:07 |
| Eickmeyer | Policy-breaching from our end. | 05:07 |
| RAOF | Could we just do that when building the the source package? | 05:07 |
| RAOF | We can stash binaries in the source package 😬 | 05:08 |
| Eickmeyer | I mean, ew, and repack, and yikes, but... I suppose. Makes the diff even diffier. XD | 05:09 |
| Eickmeyer | Would also have to patch the makefile to *not* git clone. | 05:10 |
| RAOF | I don't think you'd need to repack; source 3.0 can store binaries in the debian diff? | 05:11 |
| Eickmeyer | I'll look into it, would mean stashing in the debian directory, correct? | 05:13 |
| RAOF | Dunno, actually. | 05:15 |
| RAOF | Eickmeyer: Actually, I think `debian/source/include-binaries` is your winner. | 05:16 |
| RAOF | git clone them to wherever they need to be, list them all in include-binaries | 05:17 |
| Eickmeyer | Ah, yes. do the git clone part of the make, include the entire directory in include-binaries, then patch the makefile to remove the `git-clone` portion. | 05:18 |
| Eickmeyer | I think I'm smelling what you're stepping in. | 05:18 |
| RAOF | It is pungent. | 05:18 |
| Eickmeyer | XD | 05:18 |
| RAOF | But perhaps superior to "just disable the testsuite" | 05:19 |
| Eickmeyer | Yes, perhaps. "Just disable the testsuite" was upstream's recommendation, to which I came back with "yeahhh that breaks our stuff." | 05:19 |
| Eickmeyer | ...then did it anyway. | 05:20 |
| RAOF | 🤷♀️ | 05:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2:21.1.4-2ubuntu1.4] | 05:22 | |
| Eickmeyer | I'll get to that in the morning, since ERR:Late. | 05:23 |
| Eickmeyer | RAOF: Hey, while I've got you here, if you've got a chance, I've got edubuntu-installer hanging out in NEW that could use some love. It's not a system installer, just a metapackage installer for the revival my wife and I are doing of Edubuntu. A couple other components coming later, but this one's been sitting for a bit. | 05:24 |
| RAOF | 👍️ | 05:24 |
| RAOF | Sure, I'll poke it with a stick. | 05:24 |
| Eickmeyer | 👍️ | 05:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (jammy-proposed) [2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.6] | 05:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gnome-shell-extension-alphabetical-grid (lunar-proposed/primary) [26.0-0ubuntu1] | 05:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: bacula (jammy-proposed/primary) [9.6.7-5~22.04.1] | 06:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected digikam [source] (kinetic-proposed) [4:8.0.0~+beta1-0ubuntu0.22.10.1] | 06:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-installer [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.1] | 06:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: edubuntu-installer [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.1] (no packageset) | 06:54 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | hello ubuntu-archive, please drop missing build on riscv64: chibicc (from 0+git20220719+ds-1) | 09:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | NBS in proposed on riscv64 | 09:05 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, hey, removed | 09:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | merci bien Séb! | 09:11 |
| seb128 | de rien ! | 09:12 |
| seb128 | sil2100, hey there! :) | 09:14 |
| seb128 | sil2100, any idea why https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/lunar/ubuntu doesn't include arm64 builds? | 09:14 |
| sil2100 | seb128: so re: the arm64 ubuntu images - we disabled those builds as well, we never really did anything with them, they were just being built but we never tested or actually consume them (and from what I knew, they were broken) | 09:15 |
| sil2100 | seb128: at least the old ubuntu arm64 ones | 09:15 |
| sil2100 | seb128: since this is now building the new installer images, I can switch them on now once again if you think it makes sense | 09:16 |
| seb128 | sil2100, you mean? https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/kinetic/ubuntu had arm64 builds | 09:16 |
| seb128 | sil2100, the reason I'm asking is because http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/pending/ has an outdated arm64 iso, so we either need to remove it or to get it updated | 09:16 |
| sil2100 | Yes, but we never did anything with those arm64 images in the past, they were all experimental, something that I think Dimitri added at some point in time | 09:16 |
| sil2100 | seb128: does it make sense to build arm64 new-installer images? Do you know? | 09:17 |
| seb128 | I don't really know. We have a special image for raspi? or how do people install a pi desktop? | 09:17 |
| sil2100 | We do have preinstalled desktop pi images | 09:18 |
| seb128 | right | 09:18 |
| sil2100 | Since that was the way we provided pi desktop images - the arm64 ubiquity ones were uh, I think added by Dimitri because he had some arm64 laptop at some point IIRC | 09:18 |
| seb128 | we keep talking about 'arm based laptops becoming reality' for years, but I don't know how true that is today | 09:18 |
| sil2100 | seb128: ok, let me clear out the old arm64 images then | 09:18 |
| seb128 | sil2100, thanks, we can always enable it later if there is demand | 09:19 |
| sil2100 | But in case you hear somewhere we should try building the arm64 installer images again (but with the new installer), just give me a poke | 09:19 |
| seb128 | 👍 | 09:19 |
| sil2100 | I'd be worried that right now they'd FTBFS | 09:19 |
| seb128 | thanks! | 09:19 |
| seb128 | right, well we could try if we want to know the status | 09:20 |
| seb128 | but as you said we don't have hardware and wouldn't be able to do much with those anyway | 09:20 |
| seb128 | so let's not waste efforts or something which has little use | 09:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kgeotag [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset) | 09:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.173.2~18.04.1 => 1.187.2~18.04.1] (core) (sync) | 09:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.173.4 => 1.187.2~20.04.2] (core) (sync) | 09:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (bionic-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu47.4 => 2.06-2ubuntu14] (no packageset) (sync) | 09:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu47.5 => 2.06-2ubuntu14] (no packageset) (sync) | 09:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu47.5 => 2.06-2ubuntu12] (no packageset) (sync) | 09:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kgeotag [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset) | 09:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset) | 09:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset) | 09:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset) | 09:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset) | 09:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset) | 09:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kgeotag [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset) | 09:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-unsigned [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu12] | 10:05 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, if we restore kamailio 5.6.2-1build2 we can let protobuf migrate next run | 10:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and then go back to 5.6.2-1build3 | 10:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | what do you think? | 10:14 |
| * LocutusOfBorg unless Britney thinks otherwise | 10:15 | |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, what do you mean 'restore'? that's the version in lunar | 10:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | build2 is built against protobuf, but not against qtbase .8 | 10:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so if we restore build1 for one britney run, we can disentangle protobuf/libphonenumber with qtbase and perl and python | 10:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and then copy-back | 10:16 |
| seb128 | you said build2 and not build1 | 10:16 |
| seb128 | I'm lost | 10:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, if we restore kamailio 5.6.2-1build2 we can let protobuf migrate next run | 10:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and then go back to 5.6.2-1build3 | 10:17 |
| seb128 | restore were? that version is in lunar | 10:17 |
| seb128 | you mean delete 5.6.2-1build3 from proposed? | 10:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm lost too, sorry | 10:17 |
| seb128 | but I don't see any mention of kamailio blocking protobuf on | 10:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I was sure build1 was in lunar | 10:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | kamailio is blocking via libphonenumber? | 10:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but protobuf is not ready so britney is not calculating it? | 10:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | if it goes in, even better | 10:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I want grpc/protobuf to go in | 10:19 |
| seb128 | protobuf status is currently waiting on s390x test results for mysql-8.0 and protobuf itself | 10:19 |
| seb128 | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#protobuf doesn't tell us about other potential problems for now | 10:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the tests are done | 10:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is why I want it to migrate on next britney run | 10:20 |
| seb128 | but the excuses page isn't refreshed so it's hard ot guess what britney will raise next | 10:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yep, and the notest output is foo | 10:23 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, so you think that deleting kamailio is going to help? | 10:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I guess so, but I'm not sure sorry | 10:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I fail to parse britney :D | 10:23 |
| seb128 | I don't understand why it would | 10:23 |
| seb128 | either kamailio needs to be rebuilt for the new protobuf and it is needed | 10:24 |
| seb128 | or it doesn't but then why it block migration? | 10:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | maybe you are right | 10:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is what I see on protobuf | 10:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Implicit dependency: protobuf libphonenumber | 10:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and on phonenumber: Implicit dependency: libphonenumber kamailio | 10:25 |
| seb128 | I don't think deleting if would remove the depends though | 10:26 |
| RikMills | LocutusOfBorg: s/kamailio/kitinerary ? | 10:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes also :D | 10:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, kitinerary 22.12.1-0ubuntu1 and then copy back 22.12.1-0ubuntu2 if protobuf goes in | 10:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | :) | 10:33 |
| seb128 | I've a feeling protobuf isn't as close of migrating that you would like at this point :-/ | 10:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: analizo [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.25.4-2] (no packageset) | 10:43 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | sad | 10:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 12:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 12:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 12:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 12:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 12:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dotnet7 [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [7.0.101-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 12:58 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok perl might be mostly ready for migration | 13:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | for python3-defaults, lots of implicit dependencies are out of debian testing | 13:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | can't we just remove them, to have a better view? | 13:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 14:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (jammy-proposed/main) [2.1.4-0ubuntu0.1 => 2.1.5-1ubuntu6~22.04.1] (core, kernel-dkms) | 14:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r8168 (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [8.049.02-1ubuntu1 => 8.049.02-1ubuntu1.1] (kernel-dkms) | 14:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r8125 (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [9.007.01-3 => 9.007.01-3ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 14:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oss4 (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.2-build2010-5ubuntu9 => 4.2-build2010-5ubuntu9.1] (kernel-dkms) | 14:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysdig (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.27.1-0.3build1 => 0.27.1-0.3ubuntu0.1] (kernel-dkms) | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.13.1-1ubuntu0.22.04.2 => 2.13.1-1ubuntu0.22.04.3] (kernel-dkms) | 14:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: broadcom-sta (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [6.30.223.271-17 => 6.30.223.271-23~22.04.1] (kernel-dkms) | 14:52 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | why is britney notest run empty log file? | 15:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it takes one hour to run, and results in an empty file? | 15:08 |
| ginggs | LocutusOfBorg: the notest log has a start and end time, and update_output_notest.txt itself is not empty | 16:29 |
| ginggs | is there something missing? | 16:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | once it was full of information | 16:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | like what would have migrated if tests were hinted | 16:37 |
| RikMills | LocutusOfBorg: this? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output_notest.txt | 16:42 |
| RikMills | or the one here: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/lunar/ | 16:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | LOL | 16:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I was looking at the wrong file! | 17:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/lunar/2023-01-18/ | 17:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this one | 17:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | its always 68 bytes | 17:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and back of some years ago, before britney was updated, it used to contain the log as the other one | 17:00 |
| ginggs | would someone please reject the dotnet7 binaries from lunar NEW? | 17:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debvm [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.2] (no packageset) | 17:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (jammy-proposed/universe) [9858-0ubuntu3.1 => 9858-0ubuntu3.2] (no packageset) | 17:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu14] | 18:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.187.2~20.04.2] | 18:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-unsigned [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu47.5] | 18:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.25] | 18:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.173.4~18.04.1] | 18:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu14] | 18:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.187.2~18.04.1] | 18:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.2.6.3-1ubuntu4] | 18:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.6.3-1ubuntu1.3] | 18:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dnsmasq (jammy-proposed/main) [2.86-1.1ubuntu0.1 => 2.86-1.1ubuntu0.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 20:25 | |
| RikMills | Eickmeyer: fyi https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029171 | 20:33 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1029171 in ftp.debian.org "RM: muon -- ROM; Abandoned upstream" [Normal, Open] | 20:33 | |
| RikMills | wrong channel :/ | 20:34 |
| Eickmeyer | *sigh* | 20:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dotnet7 [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [7.0.101-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 21:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted analizo [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.25.4-2] | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7] | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7] | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7] | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kgeotag [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.1-1] | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tuxguitar [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.5.6+dfsg1-1] | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debvm [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.2] | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7] | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kgeotag [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.1-1] | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7] | 22:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kgeotag [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.1-1] | 22:06 | |
| Eickmeyer | ubuntu-archive: Thanks to RAOF for approving edubuntu-installer! Any chance we can get the binary package approved? It's completely clean. | 23:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bpython [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.24-1] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: manpages-l10n [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4.17.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:39 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!