-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.6]02:34
RAOFEickmeyer: WRT digikam #2000490 - how much effort would it be to include the test data in the package?04:55
EickmeyerRAOF: I mean, it's a git repository on its own. The test data was in the package until the upstream devs arbitrarily decided to remove it prior to beta release.05:06
EickmeyerTheir entire make script calls "git clone" to get it. >.<05:07
EickmeyerPolicy-breaching from our end.05:07
RAOFCould we just do that when building the the source package?05:07
RAOFWe can stash binaries in the source package 😬05:08
EickmeyerI mean, ew, and repack, and yikes, but... I suppose. Makes the diff even diffier. XD05:09
EickmeyerWould also have to patch the makefile to *not* git clone.05:10
RAOFI don't think you'd need to repack; source 3.0 can store binaries in the debian diff?05:11
EickmeyerI'll look into it, would mean stashing in the debian directory, correct?05:13
RAOFDunno, actually.05:15
RAOFEickmeyer: Actually, I think `debian/source/include-binaries` is your winner.05:16
RAOFgit clone them to wherever they need to be, list them all in include-binaries05:17
EickmeyerAh, yes. do the git clone part of the make, include the entire directory in include-binaries, then patch the makefile to remove the `git-clone` portion.05:18
EickmeyerI think I'm smelling what you're stepping in.05:18
RAOFIt is pungent.05:18
RAOFBut perhaps superior to "just disable the testsuite"05:19
EickmeyerYes, perhaps. "Just disable the testsuite" was upstream's recommendation, to which I came back with "yeahhh that breaks our stuff."05:19
Eickmeyer...then did it anyway.05:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2:21.1.4-2ubuntu1.4]05:22
EickmeyerI'll get to that in the morning, since ERR:Late.05:23
EickmeyerRAOF: Hey, while I've got you here, if you've got a chance, I've got edubuntu-installer hanging out in NEW that could use some love. It's not a system installer, just a metapackage installer for the revival my wife and I are doing of Edubuntu. A couple other components coming later, but this one's been sitting for a bit.05:24
RAOFSure, I'll poke it with a stick.05:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (jammy-proposed) [2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.6]05:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gnome-shell-extension-alphabetical-grid (lunar-proposed/primary) [26.0-0ubuntu1]05:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: bacula (jammy-proposed/primary) [9.6.7-5~22.04.1]06:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected digikam [source] (kinetic-proposed) [4:8.0.0~+beta1-0ubuntu0.22.10.1]06:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-installer [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.1]06:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: edubuntu-installer [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.1] (no packageset)06:54
LocutusOfBorghello ubuntu-archive, please drop missing build on riscv64: chibicc (from 0+git20220719+ds-1)09:05
LocutusOfBorgNBS in proposed on riscv6409:05
seb128LocutusOfBorg, hey, removed09:08
LocutusOfBorgmerci bien Séb!09:11
seb128de rien !09:12
seb128sil2100, hey there! :)09:14
seb128sil2100, any idea why https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/lunar/ubuntu doesn't include arm64 builds?09:14
sil2100seb128: so re: the arm64 ubuntu images - we disabled those builds as well, we never really did anything with them, they were just being built but we never tested or actually consume them (and from what I knew, they were broken)09:15
sil2100seb128: at least the old ubuntu arm64 ones09:15
sil2100seb128: since this is now building the new installer images, I can switch them on now once again if you think it makes sense09:16
seb128sil2100, you mean? https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/kinetic/ubuntu had arm64 builds09:16
seb128sil2100, the reason I'm asking is because http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/pending/ has an outdated arm64 iso, so we either need to remove it or to get it updated09:16
sil2100Yes, but we never did anything with those arm64 images in the past, they were all experimental, something that I think Dimitri added at some point in time09:16
sil2100seb128: does it make sense to build arm64 new-installer images? Do you know?09:17
seb128I don't really know. We have a special image for raspi? or how do people install a pi desktop?09:17
sil2100We do have preinstalled desktop pi images09:18
sil2100Since that was the way we provided pi desktop images - the arm64 ubiquity ones were uh, I think added by Dimitri because he had some arm64 laptop at some point IIRC09:18
seb128we keep talking about 'arm based laptops becoming reality' for years, but I don't know how true that is today09:18
sil2100seb128: ok, let me clear out the old arm64 images then09:18
seb128sil2100, thanks, we can always enable it later if there is demand09:19
sil2100But in case you hear somewhere we should try building the arm64 installer images again (but with the new installer), just give me a poke09:19
sil2100I'd be worried that right now they'd FTBFS09:19
seb128right, well we could try if we want to know the status09:20
seb128but as you said we don't have hardware and wouldn't be able to do much with those anyway09:20
seb128so let's not waste efforts or something which has little use09:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kgeotag [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset)09:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.173.2~18.04.1 => 1.187.2~18.04.1] (core) (sync)09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.173.4 => 1.187.2~20.04.2] (core) (sync)09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (bionic-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu47.4 => 2.06-2ubuntu14] (no packageset) (sync)09:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu47.5 => 2.06-2ubuntu14] (no packageset) (sync)09:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu47.5 => 2.06-2ubuntu12] (no packageset) (sync)09:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kgeotag [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset)09:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset)09:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset)09:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset)09:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset)09:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset)09:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kgeotag [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset)09:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-unsigned [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu12]10:05
LocutusOfBorgseb128, if we restore kamailio  5.6.2-1build2 we can let protobuf migrate next run10:14
LocutusOfBorgand then go back to  5.6.2-1build310:14
LocutusOfBorgwhat do you think?10:14
* LocutusOfBorg unless Britney thinks otherwise10:15
seb128LocutusOfBorg, what do you mean 'restore'? that's the version in lunar10:15
LocutusOfBorgbuild2 is built against protobuf, but not against qtbase .810:16
LocutusOfBorgso if we restore build1 for one britney run, we can disentangle protobuf/libphonenumber with qtbase and perl and python10:16
LocutusOfBorgand then copy-back10:16
seb128you said build2 and not build110:16
seb128I'm lost10:16
LocutusOfBorgseb128, if we restore kamailio  5.6.2-1build2 we can let protobuf migrate next run10:17
LocutusOfBorgand then go back to  5.6.2-1build310:17
seb128restore were? that version is in lunar10:17
seb128you mean delete 5.6.2-1build3 from proposed?10:17
LocutusOfBorgI'm lost too, sorry10:17
seb128but I don't see any mention of kamailio blocking protobuf on10:18
LocutusOfBorgI was sure build1 was in lunar10:18
LocutusOfBorgkamailio is blocking via libphonenumber?10:18
LocutusOfBorgbut protobuf is not ready so britney is not calculating it?10:18
LocutusOfBorgif it goes in, even better10:18
LocutusOfBorgI want grpc/protobuf to go in10:19
seb128protobuf status is currently waiting on s390x test results for mysql-8.0 and protobuf itself10:19
seb128https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#protobuf doesn't tell us about other potential problems for now10:19
LocutusOfBorgthe tests are done10:20
LocutusOfBorgthis is why I want it to migrate on next britney run10:20
seb128but the excuses page isn't refreshed so it's hard ot guess what britney will raise next10:20
LocutusOfBorgyep, and the notest output is foo10:23
seb128LocutusOfBorg, so you think that deleting kamailio is going to help?10:23
LocutusOfBorgI guess so, but I'm not sure sorry10:23
LocutusOfBorgI fail to parse britney :D10:23
seb128I don't understand why it would10:23
seb128either kamailio needs to be rebuilt for the new protobuf and it is needed10:24
seb128or it doesn't but then why it block migration?10:24
LocutusOfBorgmaybe you are right10:24
LocutusOfBorgthis is what I see on protobuf10:25
LocutusOfBorgImplicit dependency: protobuf libphonenumber10:25
LocutusOfBorgand on phonenumber: Implicit dependency: libphonenumber kamailio10:25
seb128I don't think deleting if would remove the depends though10:26
RikMillsLocutusOfBorg: s/kamailio/kitinerary ?10:32
LocutusOfBorgyes also :D10:33
LocutusOfBorgseb128, kitinerary 22.12.1-0ubuntu1 and then copy back 22.12.1-0ubuntu2 if protobuf goes in10:33
seb128I've a feeling protobuf isn't as close of migrating that you would like at this point :-/10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: analizo [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.25.4-2] (no packageset)10:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)12:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)12:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)12:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)12:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)12:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dotnet7 [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [7.0.101-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)12:58
LocutusOfBorgok perl might be mostly ready for migration13:28
LocutusOfBorgfor python3-defaults, lots of implicit dependencies are out of debian testing13:29
LocutusOfBorgcan't we just remove them, to have a better view?13:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)14:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (jammy-proposed/main) [2.1.4-0ubuntu0.1 => 2.1.5-1ubuntu6~22.04.1] (core, kernel-dkms)14:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r8168 (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [8.049.02-1ubuntu1 => 8.049.02-1ubuntu1.1] (kernel-dkms)14:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r8125 (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [9.007.01-3 => 9.007.01-3ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)14:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oss4 (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.2-build2010-5ubuntu9 => 4.2-build2010-5ubuntu9.1] (kernel-dkms)14:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysdig (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.27.1-0.3build1 => 0.27.1-0.3ubuntu0.1] (kernel-dkms)14:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.13.1-1ubuntu0.22.04.2 => 2.13.1-1ubuntu0.22.04.3] (kernel-dkms)14:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: broadcom-sta (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [ =>] (kernel-dkms)14:52
LocutusOfBorgwhy is britney notest run empty log file?15:07
LocutusOfBorgit takes one hour to run, and results in an empty file?15:08
ginggsLocutusOfBorg: the notest log has a start and end time, and update_output_notest.txt itself is not empty16:29
ginggsis there something missing?16:31
LocutusOfBorgonce it was full of information16:37
LocutusOfBorglike what would have migrated if tests were hinted16:37
RikMillsLocutusOfBorg: this? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output_notest.txt16:42
RikMillsor the one here: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/lunar/16:46
LocutusOfBorgI was looking at the wrong file!17:00
LocutusOfBorgthis one17:00
LocutusOfBorgits always 68 bytes17:00
LocutusOfBorgand back of some years ago, before britney was updated, it used to contain the log as the other one17:00
ginggswould someone please reject the dotnet7 binaries from lunar NEW?17:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debvm [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.2] (no packageset)17:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (jammy-proposed/universe) [9858-0ubuntu3.1 => 9858-0ubuntu3.2] (no packageset)17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu14]18:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.187.2~20.04.2]18:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-unsigned [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu47.5]18:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.25]18:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.173.4~18.04.1]18:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu14]18:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.187.2~18.04.1]18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (kinetic-proposed) []18:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (jammy-proposed) []18:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dnsmasq (jammy-proposed/main) [2.86-1.1ubuntu0.1 => 2.86-1.1ubuntu0.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)20:25
RikMillsEickmeyer: fyi https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=102917120:33
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1029171 in ftp.debian.org "RM: muon -- ROM; Abandoned upstream" [Normal, Open]20:33
RikMillswrong channel :/20:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dotnet7 [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [7.0.101-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)21:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted analizo [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.25.4-2]22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7]22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7]22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7]22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kgeotag [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.1-1]22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tuxguitar [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.5.6+dfsg1-1]22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debvm [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.2]22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7]22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kgeotag [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.1-1]22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7]22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kgeotag [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.1-1]22:06
Eickmeyerubuntu-archive: Thanks to RAOF for approving edubuntu-installer! Any chance we can get the binary package approved? It's completely clean.23:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bpython [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.24-1] (no packageset)23:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: manpages-l10n [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4.17.0-1] (no packageset)23:39

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!