[02:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.6]
[04:55] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: WRT digikam #2000490 - how much effort would it be to include the test data in the package?
[05:06] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: I mean, it's a git repository on its own. The test data was in the package until the upstream devs arbitrarily decided to remove it prior to beta release.
[05:07] <Eickmeyer> Their entire make script calls "git clone" to get it. >.<
[05:07] <Eickmeyer> Policy-breaching from our end.
[05:07] <RAOF> Could we just do that when building the the source package?
[05:08] <RAOF> We can stash binaries in the source package 😬
[05:09] <Eickmeyer> I mean, ew, and repack, and yikes, but... I suppose. Makes the diff even diffier. XD
[05:10] <Eickmeyer> Would also have to patch the makefile to *not* git clone.
[05:11] <RAOF> I don't think you'd need to repack; source 3.0 can store binaries in the debian diff?
[05:13] <Eickmeyer> I'll look into it, would mean stashing in the debian directory, correct?
[05:15] <RAOF> Dunno, actually.
[05:16] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: Actually, I think `debian/source/include-binaries` is your winner.
[05:17] <RAOF> git clone them to wherever they need to be, list them all in include-binaries
[05:18] <Eickmeyer> Ah, yes. do the git clone part of the make, include the entire directory in include-binaries, then patch the makefile to remove the `git-clone` portion.
[05:18] <Eickmeyer> I think I'm smelling what you're stepping in.
[05:18] <RAOF> It is pungent.
[05:18] <Eickmeyer> XD
[05:19] <RAOF> But perhaps superior to "just disable the testsuite"
[05:19] <Eickmeyer> Yes, perhaps. "Just disable the testsuite" was upstream's recommendation, to which I came back with "yeahhh that breaks our stuff."
[05:20] <Eickmeyer> ...then did it anyway.
[05:20] <RAOF> 🤷‍♀️
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2:21.1.4-2ubuntu1.4]
[05:23] <Eickmeyer> I'll get to that in the morning, since ERR:Late.
[05:24] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: Hey, while I've got you here, if you've got a chance, I've got edubuntu-installer hanging out in NEW that could use some love. It's not a system installer, just a metapackage installer for the revival my wife and I are doing of Edubuntu. A couple other components coming later, but this one's been sitting for a bit.
[05:24] <RAOF> 👍️
[05:24] <RAOF> Sure, I'll poke it with a stick.
[05:28] <Eickmeyer> 👍️
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (jammy-proposed) [2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.6]
[05:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gnome-shell-extension-alphabetical-grid (lunar-proposed/primary) [26.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: bacula (jammy-proposed/primary) [9.6.7-5~22.04.1]
[06:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected digikam [source] (kinetic-proposed) [4:8.0.0~+beta1-0ubuntu0.22.10.1]
[06:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted edubuntu-installer [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.1]
[06:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: edubuntu-installer [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.1] (no packageset)
[09:05] <LocutusOfBorg> hello ubuntu-archive, please drop missing build on riscv64: chibicc (from 0+git20220719+ds-1)
[09:05] <LocutusOfBorg> NBS in proposed on riscv64
[09:08] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, hey, removed
[09:11] <LocutusOfBorg> merci bien Séb!
[09:12] <seb128> de rien !
[09:14] <seb128> sil2100, hey there! :)
[09:14] <seb128> sil2100, any idea why https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/lunar/ubuntu doesn't include arm64 builds?
[09:15] <sil2100> seb128: so re: the arm64 ubuntu images - we disabled those builds as well, we never really did anything with them, they were just being built but we never tested or actually consume them (and from what I knew, they were broken)
[09:15] <sil2100> seb128: at least the old ubuntu arm64 ones
[09:16] <sil2100> seb128: since this is now building the new installer images, I can switch them on now once again if you think it makes sense
[09:16] <seb128> sil2100, you mean? https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/kinetic/ubuntu had arm64 builds
[09:16] <seb128> sil2100, the reason I'm asking is because http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/pending/ has an outdated arm64 iso, so we either need to remove it or to get it updated
[09:16] <sil2100> Yes, but we never did anything with those arm64 images in the past, they were all experimental, something that I think Dimitri added at some point in time
[09:17] <sil2100> seb128: does it make sense to build arm64 new-installer images? Do you know?
[09:17] <seb128> I don't really know. We have a special image for raspi? or how do people install a pi desktop?
[09:18] <sil2100> We do have preinstalled desktop pi images
[09:18] <seb128> right
[09:18] <sil2100> Since that was the way we provided pi desktop images - the arm64 ubiquity ones were uh, I think added by Dimitri because he had some arm64 laptop at some point IIRC
[09:18] <seb128> we keep talking about 'arm based laptops becoming reality' for years, but I don't know how true that is today
[09:18] <sil2100> seb128: ok, let me clear out the old arm64 images then
[09:19] <seb128> sil2100, thanks, we can always enable it later if there is demand
[09:19] <sil2100> But in case you hear somewhere we should try building the arm64 installer images again (but with the new installer), just give me a poke
[09:19] <seb128> 👍
[09:19] <sil2100> I'd be worried that right now they'd FTBFS
[09:19] <seb128> thanks!
[09:20] <seb128> right, well we could try if we want to know the status
[09:20] <seb128> but as you said we don't have hardware and wouldn't be able to do much with those anyway
[09:20] <seb128> so let's not waste efforts or something which has little use
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kgeotag [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.173.2~18.04.1 => 1.187.2~18.04.1] (core) (sync)
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.173.4 => 1.187.2~20.04.2] (core) (sync)
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (bionic-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu47.4 => 2.06-2ubuntu14] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu47.5 => 2.06-2ubuntu14] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu47.5 => 2.06-2ubuntu12] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kgeotag [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset)
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset)
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset)
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset)
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hippotat [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.1.7] (no packageset)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kgeotag [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-unsigned [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu12]
[10:14] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, if we restore kamailio  5.6.2-1build2 we can let protobuf migrate next run
[10:14] <LocutusOfBorg> and then go back to  5.6.2-1build3
[10:14] <LocutusOfBorg> what do you think?
[10:15]  * LocutusOfBorg unless Britney thinks otherwise
[10:15] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, what do you mean 'restore'? that's the version in lunar
[10:16] <LocutusOfBorg> build2 is built against protobuf, but not against qtbase .8
[10:16] <LocutusOfBorg> so if we restore build1 for one britney run, we can disentangle protobuf/libphonenumber with qtbase and perl and python
[10:16] <LocutusOfBorg> and then copy-back
[10:16] <seb128> you said build2 and not build1
[10:16] <seb128> I'm lost
[10:17] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, if we restore kamailio  5.6.2-1build2 we can let protobuf migrate next run
[10:17] <LocutusOfBorg> and then go back to  5.6.2-1build3
[10:17] <seb128> restore were? that version is in lunar
[10:17] <seb128> you mean delete 5.6.2-1build3 from proposed?
[10:17] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm lost too, sorry
[10:18] <seb128> but I don't see any mention of kamailio blocking protobuf on
[10:18] <LocutusOfBorg> I was sure build1 was in lunar
[10:18] <LocutusOfBorg> kamailio is blocking via libphonenumber?
[10:18] <LocutusOfBorg> but protobuf is not ready so britney is not calculating it?
[10:18] <LocutusOfBorg> if it goes in, even better
[10:19] <LocutusOfBorg> I want grpc/protobuf to go in
[10:19] <seb128> protobuf status is currently waiting on s390x test results for mysql-8.0 and protobuf itself
[10:19] <seb128> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#protobuf doesn't tell us about other potential problems for now
[10:20] <LocutusOfBorg> the tests are done
[10:20] <LocutusOfBorg> this is why I want it to migrate on next britney run
[10:20] <seb128> but the excuses page isn't refreshed so it's hard ot guess what britney will raise next
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> yep, and the notest output is foo
[10:23] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, so you think that deleting kamailio is going to help?
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> I guess so, but I'm not sure sorry
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> I fail to parse britney :D
[10:23] <seb128> I don't understand why it would
[10:24] <seb128> either kamailio needs to be rebuilt for the new protobuf and it is needed
[10:24] <seb128> or it doesn't but then why it block migration?
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe you are right
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> this is what I see on protobuf
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> Implicit dependency: protobuf libphonenumber
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> and on phonenumber: Implicit dependency: libphonenumber kamailio
[10:26] <seb128> I don't think deleting if would remove the depends though
[10:32] <RikMills> LocutusOfBorg: s/kamailio/kitinerary ?
[10:33] <LocutusOfBorg> yes also :D
[10:33] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, kitinerary 22.12.1-0ubuntu1 and then copy back 22.12.1-0ubuntu2 if protobuf goes in
[10:33] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[10:38] <seb128> I've a feeling protobuf isn't as close of migrating that you would like at this point :-/
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: analizo [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.25.4-2] (no packageset)
[10:52] <LocutusOfBorg> sad
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dotnet7 [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [7.0.101-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:28] <LocutusOfBorg> ok perl might be mostly ready for migration
[13:29] <LocutusOfBorg> for python3-defaults, lots of implicit dependencies are out of debian testing
[13:29] <LocutusOfBorg> can't we just remove them, to have a better view?
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.64.0+dfsg1-1~exp2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (jammy-proposed/main) [2.1.4-0ubuntu0.1 => 2.1.5-1ubuntu6~22.04.1] (core, kernel-dkms)
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r8168 (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [8.049.02-1ubuntu1 => 8.049.02-1ubuntu1.1] (kernel-dkms)
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r8125 (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [9.007.01-3 => 9.007.01-3ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oss4 (jammy-proposed/universe) [4.2-build2010-5ubuntu9 => 4.2-build2010-5ubuntu9.1] (kernel-dkms)
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysdig (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.27.1-0.3build1 => 0.27.1-0.3ubuntu0.1] (kernel-dkms)
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.13.1-1ubuntu0.22.04.2 => 2.13.1-1ubuntu0.22.04.3] (kernel-dkms)
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: broadcom-sta (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [6.30.223.271-17 => 6.30.223.271-23~22.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[15:07] <LocutusOfBorg> why is britney notest run empty log file?
[15:08] <LocutusOfBorg> it takes one hour to run, and results in an empty file?
[16:29] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: the notest log has a start and end time, and update_output_notest.txt itself is not empty
[16:31] <ginggs> is there something missing?
[16:37] <LocutusOfBorg> once it was full of information
[16:37] <LocutusOfBorg> like what would have migrated if tests were hinted
[16:42] <RikMills> LocutusOfBorg: this? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output_notest.txt
[16:46] <RikMills> or the one here: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/lunar/
[16:59] <LocutusOfBorg> LOL
[17:00] <LocutusOfBorg> I was looking at the wrong file!
[17:00] <LocutusOfBorg> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/lunar/2023-01-18/
[17:00] <LocutusOfBorg> this one
[17:00] <LocutusOfBorg> its always 68 bytes
[17:00] <LocutusOfBorg> and back of some years ago, before britney was updated, it used to contain the log as the other one
[17:17] <ginggs> would someone please reject the dotnet7 binaries from lunar NEW?
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debvm [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.2] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (jammy-proposed/universe) [9858-0ubuntu3.1 => 9858-0ubuntu3.2] (no packageset)
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu14]
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.187.2~20.04.2]
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-unsigned [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu47.5]
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.25]
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.173.4~18.04.1]
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu14]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.187.2~18.04.1]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.2.6.3-1ubuntu4]
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.6.3-1ubuntu1.3]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dnsmasq (jammy-proposed/main) [2.86-1.1ubuntu0.1 => 2.86-1.1ubuntu0.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[20:33] <RikMills> Eickmeyer: fyi https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029171
[20:33] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1029171 in ftp.debian.org "RM: muon -- ROM; Abandoned upstream" [Normal, Open]
[20:34] <RikMills> wrong channel :/
[20:36] <Eickmeyer> *sigh*
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dotnet7 [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [7.0.101-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted analizo [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.25.4-2]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kgeotag [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.1-1]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tuxguitar [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.5.6+dfsg1-1]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debvm [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.2]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kgeotag [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.1-1]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hippotat [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.7]
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kgeotag [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.1-1]
[23:15] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: Thanks to RAOF for approving edubuntu-installer! Any chance we can get the binary package approved? It's completely clean.
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bpython [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.24-1] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: manpages-l10n [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4.17.0-1] (no packageset)