| mybalzitch | so if I have my monitor at 165hz ot | 01:33 |
|---|---|---|
| mybalzitch | 'll randomly flicker under linux. modern amdgpu | 01:34 |
| mybalzitch | should I just file a bug report on the amdgpu issue tracker? | 01:34 |
| sarnold | if it's happening in the 'usual ubuntu desktop', a bug report on launchpad against gnome-shell would probably be nice, too | 01:35 |
| sarnold | (not that that's necessarily the right package, but it does grab a bunch of the useful data sources, and the desktop team has told me in the past that they will move it as necessary) | 01:35 |
| mybalzitch | or konsole? | 01:36 |
| duflu | mybalzitch, please run: ubuntu-bug gnome-shell | 01:37 |
| duflu | Bug report received | 01:58 |
| mybalzitch | wasnt me | 02:01 |
| mybalzitch | ;) | 02:01 |
| seb128 | goood morning desktopers! | 08:04 |
| duflu | Morning seb128 | 08:13 |
| === Maik6 is now known as Maik | ||
| === diddledani_ is now known as diddledani | ||
| === pizzaiolo is now known as pizza | ||
| seb128 | ricotz, I wonder if that 'Drop usage of llvm-toolchain-11 which is not used anymore' was appropriate for stable series, SRU/security usually doesn't like 'non essential changes' or at least like to have a report with rational. I'm uploading with it because it's in the vcs but I hope it doesn't create problems | 20:15 |
| ricotz | seb128, I see, Locutus_OfBorg asked for it while is creates dependency issues recently | 20:22 |
| seb128 | ricotz, why? it's a long list of | | 20:25 |
| seb128 | also why do we remove 11 and not 10? | 20:25 |
| ricotz | -10 is for bionic | 20:26 |
| ricotz | -11 was used on impish and focal+ got llvm-12 SRUs iirc | 20:26 |
| seb128 | well I was checking kinetic, you remove 11 but 10 is still in the list which feels weird | 20:27 |
| ricotz | I know, I am trying to keep the packaging in sync | 20:27 |
| seb128 | if we do >= 12 then I would have expected 11 and 10 to get removed and not only 11 | 20:27 |
| seb128 | ah, ok | 20:27 |
| ricotz | note that the SRUs are not replacing the default llvm, so specific build-deps would be still required | 20:29 |
| ricotz | *llvm SRUs | 20:29 |
| seb128 | right | 20:34 |
| ricotz | tsimonq2, jbicha, hi, please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/2003750 which prevent libreoffice autopkgtests from succeeding | 21:21 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Launchpad bug 2003750 in ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu) "Fails to configure on autopkgtests arm64/armhf" [High, New] | 21:21 | |
| tsimonq2 | ricotz: Hi, thanks! | 22:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!