[01:33] <mybalzitch> so if I have my monitor at 165hz ot
[01:34] <mybalzitch> 'll randomly flicker under linux. modern amdgpu
[01:34] <mybalzitch> should I just file a bug report on the amdgpu issue tracker?
[01:35] <sarnold> if it's happening in the 'usual ubuntu desktop', a bug report on launchpad against gnome-shell would probably be nice, too
[01:35] <sarnold> (not that that's necessarily the right package, but it does grab a bunch of the useful data sources, and the desktop team has told me in the past that they will move it as necessary)
[01:36] <mybalzitch> or konsole?
[01:37] <duflu> mybalzitch, please run:  ubuntu-bug gnome-shell
[01:58] <duflu> Bug report received
[02:01] <mybalzitch> wasnt me
[02:01] <mybalzitch> ;)
[08:04] <seb128> goood morning desktopers!
[08:13] <duflu> Morning seb128 
=== Maik6 is now known as Maik
=== diddledani_ is now known as diddledani
=== pizzaiolo is now known as pizza
[20:15] <seb128> ricotz, I wonder if that 'Drop usage of llvm-toolchain-11 which is not used anymore' was appropriate for stable series, SRU/security usually doesn't like 'non essential changes' or at least like to have a report with rational. I'm uploading with it because it's in the vcs but I hope it doesn't create problems
[20:22] <ricotz> seb128, I see, Locutus_OfBorg asked for it while is creates dependency issues recently
[20:25] <seb128> ricotz, why? it's a long list of |
[20:25] <seb128> also why do we remove 11 and not 10?
[20:26] <ricotz> -10 is for bionic
[20:26] <ricotz> -11 was used on impish and focal+ got llvm-12 SRUs iirc
[20:27] <seb128> well I was checking kinetic, you remove 11 but 10 is still in the list which feels weird
[20:27] <ricotz> I know, I am trying to keep the packaging in sync
[20:27] <seb128> if we do >= 12 then I would have expected 11 and 10 to get removed and not only 11
[20:27] <seb128> ah, ok
[20:29] <ricotz> note that the SRUs are not replacing the default llvm, so specific build-deps would be still required
[20:29] <ricotz> *llvm SRUs
[20:34] <seb128> right
[21:21] <ricotz> tsimonq2, jbicha, hi, please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/2003750 which prevent libreoffice autopkgtests from succeeding
[21:21] -ubottu:#ubuntu-desktop- Launchpad bug 2003750 in ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu) "Fails to configure on autopkgtests arm64/armhf" [High, New]
[22:56] <tsimonq2> ricotz: Hi, thanks!