[00:05] <tsimonq2> pyqt5 should be a candidate (in and of itself) on the next Britney run. qtbase-o-s looks blocked on bug 2003750 (or at the very least, a fresh set of autopkgtests with the latest upload)
[00:05] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2003750 in ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu) "Fails to configure on autopkgtests arm64/armhf" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2003750
[00:05] <tsimonq2> (If libreoffice tests passed or a hint was put in place, qtbase would be a candidate.)
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: guile-2.2 [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.2.7+1-7] (ubuntu-desktop)
[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: guile-2.2 [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.2.7+1-7] (ubuntu-desktop)
[00:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: guile-2.2 [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.2.7+1-7] (ubuntu-desktop)
[00:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: guile-2.2 [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.2.7+1-7] (ubuntu-desktop)
[00:43] <tsimonq2> python-txi2p-tahoe blocking py3-defaults is another example of bug 2003981
[00:43] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2003981 in Auto Package Testing "autodep8 needs support for pybuild-autopkgtest" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2003981
[01:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: guile-2.2 [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.2.7+1-7] (ubuntu-desktop)
[01:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted guile-2.2 [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2.2.7+1-7]
[01:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted guile-2.2 [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [2.2.7+1-7]
[01:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted guile-2.2 [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [2.2.7+1-7]
[01:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted guile-2.2 [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2.2.7+1-7]
[01:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted guile-2.2 [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [2.2.7+1-7]
[01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: digikam (kinetic-proposed/universe) [4:8.0.0~git20221002-0ubuntu1 => 4:8.0.0~+beta1-0ubuntu0.22.10.1] (kubuntu)
[02:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openturns [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.20-8build1] (no packageset)
[02:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openturns [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.20-8build1]
[02:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openturns [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.20-8build1] (no packageset)
[02:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dxchange [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.1.8-1] (no packageset)
[02:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-telephony-service [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.5-1] (no packageset)
[02:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-telephony-service [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.5-1] (no packageset)
[02:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-telephony-service [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.5-1] (no packageset)
[03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-telephony-service [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.5-1] (no packageset)
[03:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openturns [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [1.20-8build1]
[04:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri-telephony-service [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.5-1] (no packageset)
[05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dxchange [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.8-1]
[05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-telephony-service [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.5-1]
[05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-telephony-service [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.5-1]
[05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-telephony-service [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.5-1]
[05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-telephony-service [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [0.5-1]
[05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri-telephony-service [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.5-1]
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freetds [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.3.17+ds-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kosmindoormap [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [22.08.2-1] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kosmindoormap [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [22.08.2-1] (no packageset)
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kosmindoormap [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [22.08.2-1] (no packageset)
[05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kosmindoormap [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [22.08.2-1] (no packageset)
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freetds [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.17+ds-2]
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kosmindoormap [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [22.08.2-1]
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kosmindoormap [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [22.08.2-1]
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kosmindoormap [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [22.08.2-1]
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kosmindoormap [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [22.08.2-1]
[06:21] <RikMills> tsimonq2: nope. pyqt5 not a candidate. tests fails for spyder/5.3.2+dfsg-1
[06:22] <vorlon> bryceh: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plfit/0.9.4+ds-1ubuntu1~lunar1 that's not a ppa
[06:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gensio [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[07:02] <LocutusOfBorg> bryceh, hello, there is debian activity on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027851#26
[07:02] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1027851 in src:pytorch "pytorch FTBFS with Python 3.11 as default version" [Serious, Open]
[07:02] <LocutusOfBorg> so maybe they will eventually upload a fixed pytorch
[07:26] <lathiat> tjaalton: Howdy; I've got a slightly special case SRU for bacula to restore it in jammy - it was dropped from the jammy release due to a FTBFS - but added back in kinetic. amurray did part of the work uploading a fixed package and I've picked up hanlding it and updated the bug with the SRU template and tested the package as best I can. Needing help getting it reviewed & approved. We recently did similar for collectd in Bug #1971093. Not
[07:26] <lathiat> sure I understand 100% but I think because it's also a new source package it may need archive admin approval for that part rather than purely SRU approval. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1973322
[07:26] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1971093 in collectd (Ubuntu Jammy) "collectd missing in 22.04/jammy" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1971093
[07:26] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1973322 in bacula (Ubuntu Jammy) "Bacula for 22.04/Jammy" [Medium, In Progress]
[07:38] <tjaalton> lathiat: it was discussed yesterday at the sru team meeting, but this is blocked by other things atm
[08:50] <lathiat> tjaalton; are there meeting minutes/logs somewhere? can't find them. (or if not can you detail?)
[09:13] <tjaalton> lathiat: not written yet, dunno if it's public
[09:14] <tjaalton> the issue being that someone would need to own it so that the next time there are issues that would result it being removed again, there is someone to take care of it
[10:25] <tjaalton> sil2100: looks like mutter autopkgtest failure on amd64 is fixed now after the fourth retry, so you can release the stack next Monday :)
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gensio [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [2.6.2-1]
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (focal-proposed/main) [19.11.13-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 19.11.14-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-server)
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (kinetic-proposed/main) [21.11.2-0ubuntu1 => 21.11.3-0ubuntu0.22.10.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-server)
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (jammy-proposed/main) [21.11.2-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 21.11.3-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-server)
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-efi (kinetic-proposed/main) [1:1.2-3 => 1:1.2-3ubuntu0.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-signed (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.44 => 1.51~22.10.1] (core) (sync)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-efi (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.2-2~20.04.1 => 1:1.2-3ubuntu0.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-efi (jammy-proposed/main) [1:1.2-3 => 1:1.2-3ubuntu0.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.27.1ubuntu7 => 1.51~20.04.1] (core) (sync)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-signed (jammy-proposed/main) [1.44 => 1.51~22.04.1] (core) (sync)
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dotnet7 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [7.0.101-0ubuntu2~22.10.1]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dotnet7 [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [7.0.101-0ubuntu2~22.10.1]
[10:51] <rbasak> lathiat: IMHO, it's a problem for a package to be ignored in universe, and then to panic afterwards because it's broken. So I'd like for the SRU team to require a team commitment (even if in universe) to do better with the package through until the next LTS, so releasing with it broken doesn't keep happening. However the SRU team is still deliberating, so that's just my opinion at the moment, not
[10:51] <rbasak> an SRU team decision.
[10:53] <rbasak> to be ignored during development I mean, and then panic after release
[10:53] <rbasak> OTOH, if it was really being looked after and a temporary breakage was the least worst solution, then I have no concern.
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ser2net [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4.3.11-1] (no packageset)
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xtrx-dkms [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rtl8821ce [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.5.2.1-0ubuntu11~0.22.04.1]
[12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bbswitch [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.8-10ubuntu2.1]
[12:30] <RikMills> amd64 and arm64 test runners seem to have a high abnormal failure rate. seeing a lot of tests re-queue again and again
[12:30] <RikMills> spyder for example
[13:28] <sil2100> tjaalton: \o/
[13:48] <ginggs> RikMills: the spyder logs that do succeed in failing seem to be Killed
[13:48] <ginggs> I've added spyder to big_packages, let see if that helps
[13:51] <RikMills> ginggs: thanks!
[14:21] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  false negative - "exactly matches what is already found in kernel 5.19.0-23-generic." meaning build was successful, but the target kernel has the same dkms built in. we lost a fix somewhere in the dkms package's autopkgtest scripts that used to handle this correctly. In ubuntu it is expected that there are some dkms modules which are vendored in the kernel, at the exact same
[14:21] <xnox> version number.
[15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ser2net [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [4.3.11-1] (no packageset)
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ser2net [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [4.3.11-1]
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ser2net [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [4.3.11-1]
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dnsmasq [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.86-1.1ubuntu0.2]
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: igraph [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.10.2+ds-2] (no packageset)
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected casper [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.470.2]
[16:21] <ginggs> with spyder in big_packages, the autopkgtests run for about 1 hour and pass, instead of run for 5 hours and fail
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (jammy-proposed) [22.04.19]
[16:23] <vorlon> juliank: why does fwupd-efi need an update for us to get new signatures in fwupd-signed?
[16:25] <juliank> vorlon: Mistake, I forgot to pass -b to copy-package when I copied it to the uefi team PPA, so I could not replace it, so I had to rebuild it with a higher version number, now we're committed to that whether we like it or not :/
[16:25] <vorlon> ah
[16:26] <juliank> vorlon: also I fixed the indentation on shim-signed MP, and explained why the update-alternatives check is the way it is (but that comment got deleted by the push)
[16:27] <juliank> vorlon: so if you don't want to read your emails, basically we get triggered from kernel if Best points to previous, then after setup_alternatives we check if we are still pointing to best and then exit because we don't need to reinstall grub just yet
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poetry [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.1.12+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[16:28] <juliank> I hope sil2100 can release the grub2-unsigned,grub2-signed SRUs on Monday, then I can push the next round too for the OEM out of memory issues. Fix boot on 4k Nvidia laptops everywhere :D
[16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poetry [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1.1.14+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[16:30] <juliank> vorlon: Anyhow this is all a new process so there's bound to be issues, but those are gone after this because new fwupd-efi should land in the PPA. We might want to put it on the sync-blacklist though, because we should never build it in the archive, even if it gets back into sync?
[16:30] <vorlon> juliank: even after the missing -b, it would've been possible to do a binary copy direct from the archive to the signing ppa, skipping the ubuntu-uefi ppa; apw didn't want to do this?  (Now that it's done, in any case there's no reason not to go ahead with the new binaries that have been signed)
[16:31] <juliank> I don't think the solution appeared to us and apw was basically testing his signing helpers
[16:32] <vorlon> right
[16:34] <juliank> vorlon: you wanna go and hit the approval for the shim merge now, then I go and push at least push that 1.52 in kinetic to the development PPA and get signed and then we can copy it up to lunar and copy it to kinetic SRU queue. The others will need to um wait.
[16:34] <juliank> I'm running out of day :D
[16:35]  * tsimonq2 passes juliank some coffee ;)
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: igraph [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.10.2+ds-2] (no packageset)
[16:35] <juliank> I can just bump shim-signed versions everywhere to 1.52 and call it a day, though and ignore any attempts at changelog divergence :D
[16:36] <vorlon> juliank: my comment on the JIRA card was that I won't "necessarily block" but that doesn't mean I'm going to be quick to approve; I've reviewed the physical diff but need to spend a little bit more time sitting with it and thinking before I convince myself I'm happy to sign off
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: igraph [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.10.2+ds-2] (no packageset)
[16:36] <vorlon> I don't expect to suggest any more content changes so if you want to upload to various unapproved queues that's ok
[16:37] <juliank> Upload to PPA get it signed and then copy to queues :D
[16:38] <juliank> vorlon: Do you want  1.40.8 for focal or can I just do 1.52~20.04.1 (I like how you know you have the new shim if it starts with 1.52 and the only difference is changelog entries)
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: igraph [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.10.2+ds-2] (no packageset)
[16:39] <juliank> Presumably the whole thing is binary-compatible debs, lol
[16:39] <juliank> Same for jammy, it could be 1.51.1 or 1.52~22.04.1
[16:40] <juliank> OK I mean I can just merge the branch into the other branches and resolve the changelog merge conflict I suppose
[16:50] <bryceh> vorlon, reuploaded plfit, thanks for catching
[16:51] <bryceh> LocutusOfBorg: ah, there's hope for pytorch yet but sounds like still a ways off.
[16:54] <bryceh> if anyone's working on ceph, I noticed there are newer versions 1.17.1 - 1.17.5 but these don't include python 3.11 support.  However they have some bugfixes that might be worth it to focus on 1.17.5.  The real issue is that the python3.11 support is missing.  It *might* just need "3.11" added to the cmake FindPython/Support.cmake file.  https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/48947
[16:54] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Pull 48947 in ceph/ceph "cmake: add support for python 3.11" [Open]
[16:54] <bryceh> I suspect there's more to it than that, and unfortunately won't have time today to get to that.  I'll include details in my report though.
[16:58] <bryceh> sorry, 17.2.1 - 17.2.5
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcanberra [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.30-10ubuntu1.22.10.1]
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcanberra [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.30-10ubuntu1.22.04.1]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: igraph [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.10.2+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: igraph [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.10.2+ds-2] (no packageset)
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: barbican (kinetic-proposed/main) [2:15.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:15.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (kinetic-proposed/main) [2:21.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:21.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (kinetic-proposed/main) [3:26.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 3:26.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[18:19] <vorlon> juliank: which bits are still being uploaded to ppas for signing?  this is an MP on shim-signed, which doesn't route through a ppa for signing - do we not yet have shim that's been routed through there to pick up its signature from the archive key?
[18:21] <juliank> vorlon: shim-signed does route through the PPA for signing because it builds a dual-signed shimx64.efi.dualsigned with both our key and the MS key
[18:22] <juliank> vorlon: It's not being used by anything so far except on core, where it routes via core signing ppa and then has core signing key + ms signing key
[18:22] <vorlon> juliank: because it picks up the archive signature from the ppa publisher, ack
[18:22] <vorlon> I was questioning because you said "for signing" and I assumed that shim had already been sent over
[18:23] <juliank> ah yes, the MS binary is part of the merge
[18:23] <juliank> it's a bit sad we need to route all *-signed uploads, even editorial ones (just changing like a Depends) via signing PPAs now so they can pick up the signing tarballs
[18:24] <juliank> but this is safer
[18:24] <juliank> vorlon: for reference, signed binaries land in https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-uefi-team/+archive/ubuntu/proposed (which is private) and then I unembargo them to https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-uefi-team/+archive/ubuntu/proposed-public and then copy from there to SRU queues, this gets you diffs for reviews :)
[18:25] <juliank> We should probably document the signing in a specification
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd-efi [sync] (kinetic-proposed) [1:1.2-3ubuntu0.2]
[18:32] <vorlon> juliank: what are the contents of fwupd-signed/armhf?
[18:33] <juliank> vorlon: So for some reason we signed 32-bit uefi binaries in the past but I dropped them now in 1.51
[18:33] <juliank> because the signing PPAs they do not sign 32-bit binaries
[18:33] <vorlon> why don't they?
[18:34] <juliank> I don't know but also we don't sign shims or grubs for armhf, so meh
[18:34] <vorlon> juliank: yeah "so meh" doesn't fly in an SRU though
[18:35] <vorlon> dannf: ^^ do you know if anyone has been using the 32-bit arm signed fwupd?
[18:35] <vorlon> fsvo "using" up to and including "installing anywhere in a customer image"
[18:35] <juliank> I think we only got them because superm built for everything he could tbh
[18:36] <vorlon> yes. but, having existed, we need solid evidence that it's ok to change the packaging metadata on this to now drop it
[18:36] <dannf> vorlon: certainly no project i work on, but i haven't touched 32-bit hw in a while - let me ask some others
[18:36] <vorlon> dannf: thanks
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (jammy-proposed/main) [1.470.1 => 1.470.2] (desktop-core)
[18:38] <juliank> vorlon: It's awkward because there'll still be fwupd-signed:armhf in the release pocket, but at least there are no reverse-depends, only reverse-recommends from desktop meta packages and fwupd
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (jammy-proposed/main) [3:25.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 3:25.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[18:39] <juliank> but it's not strictly an issue I think because the fwupd-signed binaries in the release pocket remain installable
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (jammy-proposed/main) [2:20.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 2:20.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[18:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manila (jammy-proposed/universe) [1:14.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:14.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[18:41] <vorlon> juliank: yes but it depends on whether anything is actually consuming those binaries in a way that it depends on them not being revoked.  It's not obvious what that would be (an image booting the armhf fwupd.efi from the arm64 shim?), but due diligence is still needed
[19:23] <juliank> vorlon: my suggestion if that's possibly a blocker would be to add block-proposed-{focal,jammy,kinetic} tags and accept it to proposed so people can more easily test the new shim, though.
[19:23] <juliank> Because of the Breaks against old fwupd-signed it can't be installed otherwise
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1.6.0-2ubuntu0.20.04.2] (no packageset)
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-openshift-imagebuilder (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-2ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1.1.0-2ubuntu0.20.04.2] (no packageset)
[19:43] <juliank> vorlon: I'll go ask Mario too if he has an idea why there's armhf
[19:46] <juliank> vorlon: so he certainly had no reason to enable armhf specifically in the initial upload, just enabled everything he could
[19:53] <juliank> vorlon: of course you can discuss with ~ubuntu-signing to enable armhf on the primary signing archives and then we could also sign it, but it also feels good not to sign stuff if we don't have to
[19:54] <juliank> yes emphasis on the *if*
[20:07] <vorlon> juliank: agreed, but I want to bottom out on the question of whether it's known to be used anywhere rather than make assumptions in either direction; so I'd like to hear back from dannf
[20:08] <vorlon> I see someone has restarted the openturns/ppc64el build (it's gonna fail again)
[20:08] <juliank> I'm unembargoing shim-signed now and will copy them to archive shortly
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gst-plugins-good1.0 [arm64] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.22.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gst-plugins-good1.0 [s390x] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.22.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gst-plugins-good1.0 [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.22.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[20:12] <juliank> vorlon: why do we have shim as signed tarballs in signed/ and not as files in uefi/ like the other uefi binaries?
[20:13] <vorlon> juliank: you mean archive-side?
[20:13] <juliank> vorlon: yeah
[20:13] <vorlon> I don't know
[20:13] <juliank> I'll go ask Colin next week :D
[20:14] <vorlon> signed/ is the old style, before launchpad was split into different signing keys for different signing types (uefi vs s390x vs .ko).  uefi/ is new style.  Which directory it ends up in, depends on what's uploaded wrt the signing payload.  I believe xnox implemented the code to have shim submit for signing by the archive
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gst-plugins-good1.0 [armhf] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.22.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gst-plugins-good1.0 [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.22.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[21:04] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: ubuntu-desktop-installer
[21:11] <vorlon> ginggs: removed
[21:14] <ginggs> vorlon: ta!
[21:17] <ginggs> vorlon: should we add matplotlib to the sync-blacklist for now?
[21:18] <vorlon> ginggs: I hesitate to add things to the blacklist "for now"
[21:18] <vorlon> lest we fail to remember to remove ti
[21:18] <vorlon> it
[21:19] <ginggs> well, i'll be trying to figure out how it's broken, so will be on my radar
[21:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gst-plugins-good1.0 [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/main) [1.22.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.40.7 => 1.40.8] (core) (sync)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (jammy-proposed/main) [1.51 => 1.51.1] (core) (sync)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.51 => 1.52] (core) (sync)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (focal-proposed/main) [15.4-0ubuntu9 => 15.7-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (kinetic-proposed/main) [15.4-0ubuntu9 => 15.7-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (jammy-proposed/main) [15.4-0ubuntu9 => 15.7-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[21:50] <juliank> vorlon: ^ our delicious shims, not sure where bionic is, it didn't appear in proposed PPA, maybe it failed to sign or apw didn't submit it, check https://launchpad.net/~canonical-signing/+archive/ubuntu/primary-2022v1 maybe :)
[21:50] <juliank> maybe it got lost in the broken networking
[21:56] <juliank> bionic is on its way, hooray
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.37~18.04.11 => 1.37~18.04.12] (core) (sync)
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (bionic-proposed/main) [15.4-0ubuntu9 => 15.7-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync)
[22:25] <juliank> ^ meow
[22:27] <dannf> \o/
[22:29] <tsimonq2> 😺🎉
[22:31] <cjwatson> vorlon: you have that backwards.  "uefi" is the old style from before the signing code was generalized; "signed" is the new style.
[22:32] <cjwatson> vorlon: I believe the choice of directory depends solely on whether the upload comes with a raw-uefi part or a raw-signing part
[22:32] <cjwatson> juliank: ^
[22:33] <cjwatson> See "class UefiUpload" in https://git.launchpad.net/launchpad/tree/lib/lp/archivepublisher/signing.py#n861
[22:34] <cjwatson> So most likely the other binaries were implemented with dpkg-distaddfile raw-uefi and nobody remembered to change it (or possibly it was too much trouble to bother given the *-signed packages that download from there)
[22:50] <ginggs> fwiw, python3-defaults just migrated in Debian, and Python 3.11 is now the default there
[22:51] <vorlon> cjwatson: oh, ok :)
[23:05] <jbicha> vorlon: do you have a tool to more easily check dependencies for building additional packages on i386?
[23:12] <vorlon> jbicha: nope
[23:13] <vorlon> and germinate is useless for this because it can only track dependencies via binaries that already exist on the target arch
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblong-jump-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.000001-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmarc-loop-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.01-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtest2-plugin-uuid-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.002001-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmarc-loader-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.004001-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmoosex-attribute-env-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.02-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtest2-plugin-memusage-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.002003-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtext-csv-unicode-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.400-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libahp-xc [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.3-2] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtie-cycle-sinewave-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.05-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted igraph [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.10.2+ds-2]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libahp-xc [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.3-2]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmarc-loader-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.004001-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmoosex-attribute-env-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.02-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtest2-plugin-uuid-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.002001-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtie-cycle-sinewave-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.05-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libahp-xc [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.3-2] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted igraph [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [0.10.2+ds-2]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmarc-loop-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.01-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtext-csv-unicode-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.400-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-valuable-serde [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblong-jump-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.000001-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libahp-xc [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.3-2] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtest2-plugin-memusage-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.002003-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted igraph [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.10.2+ds-2]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted igraph [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.10.2+ds-2]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libahp-xc [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.3-2] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted igraph [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.10.2+ds-2]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-valuable-serde [armhf] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted igraph [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.10.2+ds-2]
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-valuable-serde [arm64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-valuable-serde [s390x] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-multimedia [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [6.4.2-4] (no packageset)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-multimedia [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [6.4.2-4] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (kinetic-proposed/main) [27.13.1~22.10.1 => 27.13.2~22.10.1] (core)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-multimedia [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [6.4.2-4] (no packageset)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libahp-xc [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.3-2]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libahp-xc [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.3-2]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-multimedia [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [6.4.2-4]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-valuable-serde [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-valuable-serde [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libahp-xc [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.3-2]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-multimedia [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [6.4.2-4]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-valuable-serde [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-multimedia [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [6.4.2-4]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-valuable-serde [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (jammy-proposed/main) [27.13.1~22.04.1 => 27.13.2~22.04.1] (core)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (focal-proposed/main) [27.13.1~20.04.1 => 27.13.2~20.04.1] (core)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [27.13.1~18.04.1 => 27.13.2~18.04.1] (core)
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [27.13.1~16.04.1 => 27.13.2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-multimedia [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [6.4.2-4] (no packageset)
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (kinetic-proposed) [27.13.2~22.10.1]
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [27.13.2~22.04.1]
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [27.13.2~20.04.1]
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: capnproto [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.9.2-2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [27.13.2~18.04.1]