[00:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-installer [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.13.1]
[01:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cyrus-sasl2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.1.27+dfsg2-3ubuntu1.2]
[01:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.17]
[01:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (jammy-backports/universe) [1.24.2-1~bpo22.04.1 => 1.24.5-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)
[01:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (kinetic-backports/universe) [1.23.2-1 => 1.24.5-1~bpo22.10.1] (no packageset)
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
[02:26] <arraybolt3> ubuntu-sru (or bdmurray or RAOF if available): lubuntu-update-notifer in Focal and lubuntu-default-settings in Kinetic have both passed verification and are a week old as of today. If they could be migrated to -updates, that would be awesome. Thanks! (Bug reports: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/lubuntu-update-notifier/+bug/2002255 and
[02:26] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2002255 in lubuntu-update-notifier (Ubuntu Focal) "lubuntu-update-notifier provides no good way to resolve a forcibly terminated system update" [High, Fix Committed]
[02:26] <arraybolt3> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/kinetic/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1989163)
[02:26] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1989163 in xscreensaver (Ubuntu Kinetic) "Unable to run screensaver when selected from menu" [High, In Progress]
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: isc-dhcp (jammy-proposed/main) [4.4.1-2.3ubuntu2.3 => 4.4.1-2.3ubuntu2.4] (core)
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: isc-dhcp (focal-proposed/main) [4.4.1-2.1ubuntu5.20.04.4 => 4.4.1-2.1ubuntu5.20.04.5] (core)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyflakes [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.1-2ubuntu1]
[06:41] <vorlon> ginggs: I'm inclined to think it's time to consider per-arch removals of kitty and pytango to unblock python3-defaults
[06:44] <vorlon> in fact, pytango is Debian bug #1017990 open since August, so I'm going to go ahead on that one
[06:44] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1017990 in src:pytango "src:pytango: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1017990
[06:47] <vorlon> tsimonq2: your python-hypothesis upload seems not to have fixed the autopkgtest
[06:50] <vorlon> tsimonq2: I recommend reporting the regression to Debian and then once the bug is reported, removing from lunar
[06:56] <vorlon> all the other autopkgtest failures blocking python3-defaults look ignorable (they're tests for new versions uploaded to -proposed), once python-hypothesis is cleared I would force-skiptest python3-defaults
[06:59] <vorlon> tjaalton: omg hate https://bugs.debian.org/1014503
[06:59] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1014503 in bind9-libs "bind9-libs: please provide libraries that enable reverse dependencies to use them" [Serious, Open]
[08:45] <tjaalton> vorlon: yup...
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I shamelessly stole your curl upload and merge because of #1027564
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> this way zabbix can build on riscv64
[10:47] <LocutusOfBorg> ceph build will finish in one hour or two :D
[10:54] <LocutusOfBorg> (thanks mariadb-10.6 for making my life sucks today)
[12:45] <ginggs> vorlon tsimonq2: debian bug #1030233 filed
[12:45] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1030233 in src:python-hypothesis "python-hypothesis: autopkgtest regression in testing" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1030233
[12:46] <tsimonq2> I appreciate that ginggs
[12:57] <ginggs> vorlon: i believe ogayot is preparing a fix for kitty
[13:48] <ginggs> ceph is finally built on riscv64 \o/
[13:52] <bdmurray> ginggs: Could you look at adding python-bumps to big_packages for amd64? I haven't checked to see if it passed in debian.
[13:52] <bdmurray> `dream/entropy.py::test Killed`
[14:01] <ginggs> bdmurray: sure, will do
[14:37] <tsimonq2> ginggs: 🐱> bug 2004435 just ended up in the sponsorship queue; sponsoring
[14:37] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2004435 in kitty (Ubuntu) "kitty ftbfs due to crypto test failure 'Cannot allocate memory' on ppc64el" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2004435
[14:40] <tsimonq2> (❤️ DEP-3 headers)
[14:56] <vorlon> ginggs, tsimonq2: oh wow, I just noticed a huge list of reverse-build-deps on python-hypothesis.  Considering whether to regress the tests instead of regressing buildability
[15:03] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: speaking of curl, I've dropped a number of python modules now from the i386 whitelist but still not python-cryptography, guess I need to iterate again
[15:04] <vorlon> now it's rsync :/
[15:04] <vorlon> via livecd-rootfs again
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.24.4-1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:10] <tsimonq2> vorlon: python-hypothesis> +1 actually; the two failing tests are checking for numpy deprecation warnings :P
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (kinetic-backports) [1.24.5-1~bpo22.10.1]
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (focal-backports) [1.24.4-1~bpo20.04.1]
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.24.5-1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:21] <tsimonq2> vorlon: I have a patch locally that should do the trick; testing, should have results in the next 30 mins or so
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed flask from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed impacket from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed mailcap from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed mime-support from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed nvidia-graphics-drivers-520 from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed pyasn1 from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed pycryptodome from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed pyopenssl from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed pytest-forked from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed python-future from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed python-ldap3 from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed python-ldapdomaindump from i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added package-notes to i386-whitelist in lunar
[15:28] <vorlon> tsimonq2: ok perfect. I'm going to go ahead and skiptest python3-defaults now, and we can track python-hypothesis separately
[15:28] <vorlon> ginggs: ^^
[15:28] <tsimonq2> Sounds good, thanks! :)
[15:29] <vorlon> also going to turn off autosyncing now
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted limnoria [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.1.12-1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yt-dlp [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.01.06-1~bpo22.04.1]
[15:42] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: GOOD NEWS livecd-rootfs depends on rsync but this has been present since the initial import into VCS in 2005 and hasn't been used in a LOOOOONG time
[15:44] <ddstreet> ricotz i'm looking at the libreoffice jammy backport now; do you still want to use that version, or should i reject it and wait for a bpo of 1:7.4.4-0ubuntu0.22.10.2 instead, to pick up lp: #2003735?
[15:44] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2003735 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.4.4 updates for kinetic" [Critical, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2003735
[15:46] <ricotz> ddstreet, hey, I can redo it for the .2 release, but there won't be another round of test builds and autopkgtests runs
[15:47] <ddstreet> we would need for the 22.10.2 version to get out of -proposed as well
[15:47] <ddstreet> does the backport introduce the bug?
[15:48] <ricotz> ddstreet, I don't want to ping a SRU member everyday about it :(
[15:48] <ricotz> ddstreet, yes, compared to 7.3.7 is does introduce the bug
[15:49] <ricotz> ddstreet, would you be available within the next hour to accept the "repack"?
[15:49] <ddstreet> yep i'll be around
[15:51] <ddstreet> rbasak if you have time during sru shift today can you release libreoffice from kinetic-proposed, so i can accept a backport
[15:51] <ricotz> rbasak, hello :), could you accept this libreoffice SRU into kinetic-updates? https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/2003735
[15:51] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2003735 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.4.4 updates for kinetic" [Critical, Fix Committed]
[15:51] <ddstreet> lol
[15:51] <ricotz> yeah
[15:52] <ddstreet> thanks, feel free to ping me when the backport is uploaded
[15:56] <rbasak> ddstreet, ricotz: done. Thank you for a straightforward SRU verification report that's very easy to accept :)
[16:00] <ricotz> rbasak, thank you
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (jammy-backports/main) [1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 1:7.4.4-0ubuntu0.22.10.2~bpo22.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:09] <ricotz> ddstreet, should be in the queue in a bit
[16:09] <ricotz> ddstreet, please cancel your rebuild
[16:10] <ddstreet> thanks!
[16:10] <ricotz> I am already feeling bad for all the libreoffice builds running in https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages
[16:11] <ddstreet> yeah it's pretty big pkg :)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (jammy-backports) [1:7.4.4-0ubuntu0.22.10.1~bpo22.04.1]
[16:12] <ricotz> ddstreet, exactly, there are already test builds made before proposing an official backport ;)
[16:12] <ricotz> riscv64 will take even longer which will come with libreoffice 7.5 for jammy-backports
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (jammy-backports) [1:7.4.4-0ubuntu0.22.10.2~bpo22.04.1]
[16:21] <ginggs> vorlon: ack, thanks
[16:23] <ricotz> ddstreet, thank you
[17:14] <tsimonq2> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar/lunar/arm64/l/lubuntu-update-notifier/20230201_130744_920a0@/log.gz - "update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib/shim/shimaa64.efi.signed is already managed by shimx64.efi.signed"
[17:15] <tsimonq2> ( https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/lubuntu-update-notifier/lunar/arm64 )
[17:25] <bdmurray> We fixed an issue with the arm64 images and paride requeued all the failures
[17:25] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: ^
[17:25] <tsimonq2> Ah sweet, thanks :)
[17:26] <jbicha> tsimonq2: there's some background at https://blog.jak-linux.org/2023/02/01/ubuntu-key-rotation/#regressions
[17:27] <tsimonq2> jbicha: oh nice!
[17:50] <bdmurray> Also paride is looking at the lsb-release-minimal failures
[18:00] <ginggs> bdmurray: python-bumps is happy being a big_package
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.25 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.26] (core)
[18:06] <bdmurray> ginggs: thanks, I added a few more too after reading server logs
[18:07] <LocutusOfBorg> please remove mariadb-10.6 1:10.6.11-2ubuntu1 from lunar, it doesn't make sense anymore with new src:mariadb :/
[18:07] <LocutusOfBorg> its failed to upload due to version mismatch, even though I fixed riscv64 build :/
[18:07] <LocutusOfBorg> (or maybe drop src:mariadb?
[18:22] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, hi, are there plans to switch to mariadb instead of mysql?
[18:43] <Eickmeyer> Alright, now Ubuntu Studio won't build because hugin is blocked from migration by python-defaults. Good times.
[18:44] <tsimonq2> Meh, I think python3-defaults should migrate not in this Britney run but the next one.
[18:45] <tsimonq2> (Remaining blocker is an implicit depends on kitty which triggered autopkgtests waiting on arm64 retries, so I'm not sure if it'll be picked up this run.)
[18:46] <Eickmeyer> Well, then I won't worry about removing hugin and just let it fix itself.
[18:46] <Eickmeyer> meow.
[18:46] <Eickmeyer> Means Studio should build tomorrow.
[18:50] <arraybolt3> \o/ and means that LXQt 1.2.1 updates should finally move through!
[18:50]  * arraybolt3 retreats back into the XScreenSaver shadows
[18:51] <tsimonq2> qtbase-o-s won't migrate without pyqt5, which is actually presenting a real regression :(
[18:52] <arraybolt3> Oh tar, really? Last I checked p3-d was the last blocker.
[18:52] <arraybolt3> Gah. You're right. :(
[18:53] <arraybolt3> tsimonq2: If it's a real regression, can we just revert back to the previous version for the time being (with one of those +really versions)?
[18:55] <arraybolt3> When I was looking at it, the kind of errors I was seeing implied that maybe it was just something weird with the Python versions going on (errors like "ImportError: cannot import name 'Qt' from 'PyQt5.Qt' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/PyQt5/Qt.abi3.so)" seem pretty serious and not like something that would easily regress)
[18:56] <tsimonq2> Well, I can reproduce it, unfortunately. I'm not sure if the 5.15.7 version will work with 5.15.8
[18:56] <arraybolt3> Grr. #WellThatStinks
[19:06] <tsimonq2> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030188 tracks pyqt5
[19:06] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1030188 in python3-sipbuild "PyQt5.Qt is empty" [Serious, Open]
[19:07] <arraybolt3> tsimonq2: Oh, nice.
[20:26] <bdmurray> I'm gonna remove the old version of lsb-release-minimal from the autopkgtest queue
[20:26] <LocutusOfBorg> ricotz, I don't know, and I don't honestly care too much :) I'm just trying to fix riscv64 build failures here and there
[21:25] <jbicha> ricotz: you can ask the server team if you're curious about mysql
[21:43] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, ah ok :)
[21:45] <ricotz> jbicha, I see, just asking whether there is a need to switch the client library dependency
[21:46] <jbicha> I expect Debian to continue defaulting to mariadb and Ubuntu to continue defaulting to mysql
[21:47] <ricotz> noted, I thought this might change for some reason :)
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (jammy-proposed/main) [42.0.1-1ubuntu2.2 => 42.0.1-1ubuntu2.3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-initial-setup [source] (jammy-proposed) [42.0.1-1ubuntu2.3]
[23:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (jammy-proposed/main) [42.0.1-1ubuntu2.2 => 42.0.1-1ubuntu2.3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xscreensaver (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.02+dfsg1-2ubuntu1 => 6.02+dfsg1-2ubuntu1.1] (lubuntu)