| ahasenack | vorlon: hi, didn't you encounter this openldap smbk5pwd DEP8 failure when you merged heimdal recently? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/+bug/2004560 | 13:07 |
|---|---|---|
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2004560 in openldap (Ubuntu) "smbk5pwd test fails due to perms (FS and AppArmor)" [Undecided, New] | 13:07 | |
| ahasenack | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/o/openldap/lunar/amd64 is all red | 13:07 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: it doesn't sound familiar to me | 13:42 |
| ahasenack | I was wondering how it migrated even, given all the reds | 13:44 |
| ahasenack | publishing was on 26th | 13:45 |
| ahasenack | test failed on the 25th | 13:45 |
| ahasenack | (it == heimdal) | 13:45 |
| ahasenack | ah, it's marked as superficial, maybe that was it | 13:47 |
| vorlon | superficial tests should still block if they fail | 13:48 |
| vorlon | I didn't do anything to force migration | 13:49 |
| ahasenack | we should see at least one non-failed run here then, recent: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/o/openldap/lunar/amd64 | 13:50 |
| ahasenack | let me check hints | 13:51 |
| ahasenack | no current hints | 13:52 |
| ahasenack | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 13:52 |
| ahasenack | I'll fix the bug in openldap anyway in my next upload | 13:52 |
| ahasenack | s/bug/test/ | 13:52 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: *heimdal* migrated because it didn't regress the openldap test, which was already failing since openldap updated to 2.6.3+dfsg-1~exp1ubuntu1 in December | 13:54 |
| vorlon | I see no historical hints for openldap | 13:55 |
| ahasenack | I see, so the question becomes how did openldap migrate back then | 13:56 |
| ahasenack | but that's historical now | 13:56 |
| vorlon | hmm no, the first test for this version of openldap passed on 2022-11-26, it only started failing on 2022-11-29; so maybe something else got hinted | 13:57 |
| vorlon | right | 13:57 |
| vorlon | ahasenack: it could've been the perl skiptest hint on Dec 9, if it was perl that broke it... | 13:59 |
| vorlon | but anyway yes, is historical | 13:59 |
| jawn-smi1 | #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team | 16:00 |
| jawn-smith | oops, wrong channel | 16:01 |
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| jawn-smith | jbicha: icu needs a merge rather than a sync. I'll work on that | 18:42 |
| jbicha | thanks, I was just curious :) | 18:43 |
| dbungert | cpaelzer: dpdk passed on retrigger, so when we sort out the big_packages MP I think this will be done | 18:59 |
| cpaelzer | dbungert: thanks for the info | 19:26 |
| bdmurray | dbungert: what arch does it need adding for? I can just do it | 19:45 |
| dbungert | bdmurray: the proposal was dpdk/{amd64,ppc64el,s390x} to big_packages | 19:46 |
| bdmurray | done | 19:48 |
| dbungert | Thanks! | 19:48 |
| cpaelzer | bdmurray: there was an mp up, did you merge or just change? | 19:54 |
| cpaelzer | bdmurray: in the latter case I'll remove the MP | 19:54 |
| bdmurray | cpaelzer: I only saw the first one which had a bad target branch | 19:55 |
| cpaelzer | ok, I just filed it in between meetings | 19:55 |
| bdmurray | To answer your question I did not merge | 19:55 |
| cpaelzer | I can rmeove if you have just chanded | 19:55 |
| cpaelzer | thanks | 19:55 |
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!