[01:18] why does kitty, in universe, trigger an apport autopkgtest. :| [01:19] Provides: x-terminal-emulator [01:19] siiiiiigh [01:26] vorlon: I was wondering the same thing. It's merely a terminal emulator. [01:31] yeah this is the 'autopkgtest picks up all provides and non-default alternatives' thing [01:31] *facepalm* [01:32] I don't think I can actually argue that it's incorrect. It's just annoying when it's slowing things down [01:32] Yep. It's keeping python-defaults from migrating, which is keeping hugin from migrating, which is keeping ubuntustudio from building. [01:33] I've been keeping an eye on the excuses today. [01:34] kitty already passed on a retry, and I've pushed a skiptest for omniorb-dfsg [01:34] Oh, perfect. [01:35] python-bumps is having... bumps. === chris14_ is now known as chris14 === chris14_ is now known as chris14 [11:50] sigh, gnat [11:53] hello ubuntu-archive, please reject the libroffice package of 2023-01-19 from jammy/unapproved - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libreoffice [11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (jammy-proposed/main) [1:7.4.4-0ubuntu0.22.10.2~bpo22.04.1 => 1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop) [11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] [12:02] ricotz, ^ [12:02] seb128, ty [12:24] ubuntu-archive: could you please remove ruby-defaults from sync-blacklist.txt? I need to sync it from Debian unstable now [12:24] https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist/view/head:/sync-blacklist.txt#L653 [12:24] https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist/view/head:/sync-blacklist.txt#L737 [13:40] kanashiro[m]: done [13:47] vorlon: ty! [14:18] vorlon: there is still this occurrence of ruby-defaults in that file: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist/view/head:/sync-blacklist.txt#L734 [14:21] we had it blacklisted twice? oh well then [14:22] kanashiro[m]: fixed harder [14:22] it seems so [14:22] thanks! [14:24] Not sure if autosync is still off, but sip6/pyqt5 should finally unstick things once synced [14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected docker.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [20.10.21-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] [14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: docker.io (bionic-proposed/universe) [20.10.21-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 20.10.21-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (no packageset) [14:31] hopeful for a successful gprbuild/s390x autopkgtest run with --all-proposed [14:32] LocutusOfBorg: fwiw 'retry-autopkgtest-regressions --all-proposed | grep gprbuild' gives you a single run which gathers up all relevant triggers into a single request, a bit more efficient... [14:32] (since you're already doing --all-proposed, there's no reason to have separate runs) [14:33] hmm some of these logs are still showing conflicts with gnat-11 [14:34] unreproducible in a lunar container :P [14:35] gnat is already the newest version (11.2ubuntu1). [14:35] what is this lie [14:47] skiptesting everything related to gprbuild/s390x, I don't know why this failed only on s390x but it's testbed / apt config nonsense and not worth blocking on [14:49] I've seen an autopkgtest failure or with a kernel panic `Begin: Running /scripts/init-bottom ... [ 42.658620] mv invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x140cca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|__GFP_COMP), order=0, oom_score_adj=0` [14:49] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar/lunar/amd64/i/initramfs-tools/20230202_100732_4ba12@/log.gz [15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [20.10.21-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] [15:26] vorlon, this is true, but I sometime fail to get output from the retry-autopkgtest-regressions script [15:26] and yes, locally it doesn't have the conflict issue, on s390x environment [15:27] so we are waiting for pyqt5 now? [15:31] LocutusOfBorg: "fail to get output"? [15:33] bdmurray: the filtering to avoid duplicate requests sometimes goes awry [15:35] sometimes the script returns "null" [15:36] maybe arraybolt3 or arraybolt3[m] can have a look at lubuntu-update-notifier sadness on amd64 autopkgtests? [15:37] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/lubuntu-update-notifier/lunar/arm64 [15:37] I can't reproduce locally tbh [15:39] for pyqt5 regression of pyspread we probably need 5.15.8+dfsg-2 [15:42] pyqt5/sip6 uploaded [16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.0.21-4] (no packageset) [16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.0.21-4] (no packageset) [16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.0.21-4] (no packageset) [16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.0.21-4] (no packageset) [16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.0.21-4] (no packageset) [16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2.0.21-4] [16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [2.0.21-4] [16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [2.0.21-4] [16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2.0.21-4] [16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [2.0.21-4] [16:24] LocutusOfBorg: wrt lubuntu-update-notifier sadness on PyQt5, I also could not reproduce locally and asked vorlon to trigger an --all-proposed autopkgtest retry. All that seemed to do was cause another failure but this time because of a quirk in the infra (the failure was obviously not an actual failure, I think it was some "could not retrieve file" something or other). [16:25] I don't even see how the failure in there has anything to do with PyQt5, but I was unable to make it fail no matter what I did. [16:27] Hmm, though I thought I was looking at a Bash error or something, now that i look closer, it might be an actual failure... === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer [16:45] Since I can't reproduce the failure locally, I just did an upload that adds more info to the autopkgtest output so that hopefully the logs tell us what's happening when the test runs in production. [16:46] arraybolt3: The arm64 failure? [16:47] LocutusOfBorg: not probably, we definitely need the two aforementioned uploads ;) [16:47] tsimonq2: NO, the apt-check failure. [16:48] arraybolt3: I'll follow up in l-devel [16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu7.2] [16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (jammy-proposed/main) [2.06-2ubuntu7.1 => 2.06-2ubuntu7.2] (core, i386-whitelist) [17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.06-2ubuntu7.2] [17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu26.16 => 2.04-1ubuntu26.17] (core) [17:08] tsimonq2, arraybolt3 yes, the apt-check is transient, the other one is a failure in sip [17:08] so, meh and upload and wait [17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-openshift-imagebuilder [source] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-2ubuntu0.20.04.2] [17:21] LocutusOfBorg: Hmm, I didn't even see the other failure, so I thought the apt-check thing was the only thing going wrong. [17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.17] [17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.17] [17:24] autopkgtest for pyspread/2.1.1-2: amd64: Regression ♻ , arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Regression ♻ , i386: Not a regression, ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Regression ♻ [17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi-plugin-php [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.0.15] (no packageset) [17:24] arraybolt3, ^^ :) [17:24] and its due to a problem in pyside2, introduced by a problem of sip6 [17:25] so, upload and rebuild is needed [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient [source] (focal-proposed) [1.6.0-2ubuntu0.20.04.2] [17:25] (and probably stopping autosync until the migration happens is something to be done) [17:25] Oh. I must be missing backlog, since that has nothing to do with what I thought we were talking about :P Sorry. [17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi-plugin-php [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.0.15] (no packageset) [17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi-plugin-php [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.0.15] (no packageset) [17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi-plugin-php [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.0.15] (no packageset) [17:26] arraybolt3, pyside2 regressed two autopkgtests, one we spoke about apt-foo, the other was another regression in pyside2 itself [17:26] so, giving back your apt-check test is not useful since we rebuild pyside2 anyway [17:26] and with pyside2 I mean pyqt5 [17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi-plugin-php [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.0.15] (no packageset) [17:28] K, I hope that works. I'm worried that maybe it's not PyQt5's fault at all, but the way the regressions are happening does seem to imply that it is. [17:28] (Sorry if I sound inexperienced, I've not hardly worked with autopkgtests in the past, I'm just learning how to use them now.) [17:28] arraybolt3, I couldn't reproduce locally, so I agree [18:15] Looks like hypothesis is the major hurdle for python3-defaults. [18:18] Eickmeyer: Uh, how? [18:18] skiptest is put in place, aren't we waiting on pyqt5? [18:19] tsimonq2: If there's skiptest in place, then that's surprising as it's still showing regressions on all Britney outputs for over the past 24 hours. [18:20] It's still going to show the regressions, it just doesn't care about them. [18:20] Ok. Well, I still doubt it'll migrate. [18:20] skiptest likely means "skip the autopkgtest Britney policy when considering this" [18:22] Nvm, it's pyqt5 we're waiting on now. [18:22] I just said that... ;) [18:22] I didn't investigate deep enough. *facepalm* [18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi-plugin-php [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.0.15] [18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi-plugin-php [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [0.0.15] [18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi-plugin-php [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [0.0.15] [18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi-plugin-php [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [0.0.15] [18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi-plugin-php [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [0.0.15] [18:31] LocutusOfBorg: autosync is already turned off ftr [18:31] oh nice! [18:32] vorlon, do you think we can remove uwsgi-plugin-luajit on ppc64el? [18:32] not yet done in Debian (I pinged maintainer on irc #-devel) [18:33] Missing build dependencies: libluajit-5.1-dev [18:33] this is not going to build ppc64el anytime soon [18:33] looking [18:33] LocutusOfBorg: I don't see anything to remove [18:34] I just got the build failure email. Removing hugin from Ubuntu Studio to get it to build. [18:34] vorlon, its in release? [18:34] LocutusOfBorg: not according to rmadison [18:34] meh strange [18:34] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uwsgi-plugin-luajit/0.0.7build1 [18:34] LocutusOfBorg: what are you seeing that tells you it's there? [18:34] I see it here [18:34] you see that it was built [18:34] ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh [18:34] :D [18:34] but the binary was removed, probably from a previous request of yours :) [18:35] I though after removal somebody was doing no change rebuild to avoid confusion [18:35] thanks! [18:36] so, bpftrace now back in sync with Debian [18:36] sip6/pyqt5 building, but will take 18 hours to complete riscv [18:36] paraview might now build on riscv64 [18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected bind9 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.12] [18:36] don't see any other blocker for big migration? [18:37] (uwsgi fixed) [18:38] if anybody can see if we have other blockers, please write them here [19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind9 (focal-proposed/main) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.12 => 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.13] (core, i386-whitelist) [19:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.4.2-0ubuntu5 => 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu6] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squid [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.2-1ubuntu4.3] [20:10] LocutusOfBorg, I think you want to cancel that https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyqt5/5.15.8+dfsg-2~build1/+build/25542934 [20:27] ricotz, the builders are not busy, and that build is like one hour older of the newer sync one [20:27] so, its like watching the future :D [20:39] LocutusOfBorg, seems like a waste if this is going to run 18 hours as you mentioned [20:40] feel free to cancel it :) [20:41] I don't have the rights to do so [20:55] done [21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-psych [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [5.0.2-1build1] (no packageset) [21:39] ginggs: I see you requested finalcif be run - how did you end up there? I'm dealing with an issue where some tests are OOM'ing and the test environment is handling that differently. [21:40] ginggs: I've added finalcif to big_packages and was wondering if you might have found a list of packages that might need to be in big because reading journalctl is lame. === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc [22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pivy (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.6.5-1build6 => 0.6.5-1ubuntu0.22.04.1] (no packageset) [22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pivy (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.6.7-0.1 => 0.6.7-0.1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) [22:24] kanashiro[m]: reverting your protobuf upload, protobuf is part of the python3 transition [22:41] vorlon: sorry, my script goes through all ruby rdeps and protobuf is one of them