=== chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
chromebittin | doing some more Swedish translation for the new installer | 02:11 |
---|---|---|
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
Lope2 | Installing Ubuntu-server 20.04. I chose the non-LVM layout option, so it has created 3 partitions instead. Likely boot, swap and rootfs, but I don't know what order it created them in. | 11:32 |
Lope2 | Now I'm thinking I should have chosen LVM. | 11:32 |
Alexey_ | ... | 11:34 |
Lope2 | Oh, I see it only created a single partition and no swap. | 11:34 |
Lope2 | That's fine. If I want swap I can add another swap disk to the VM | 11:34 |
Lope2 | how is the network configured in Ubuntu-server 20.04 | 11:41 |
Lope2 | looks like it's not network-manager or ifupdown or systemd network | 11:42 |
Lope2 | Okay I found it, netplan. | 11:42 |
ogra | ubuntu uses swap files by default since a while ... this is why you dont need a swap partition by default (and allows you to dynamiclly add/remove swap space) | 11:49 |
Lope2 | ogra, yeah, that's more convenient for sure. | 11:57 |
Lope2 | I've just installed Ubuntu 20.04 and the /etc/apt/sources.list is empty...? | 11:58 |
Lope2 | sources.list.d is also empty. | 11:58 |
Lope2 | Does Ubuntu not support https for deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal main | 12:01 |
konstruktoid | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archivemirrors | 12:09 |
konstruktoid | but no, been discussed now and again and signed packages is where the security is | 12:09 |
Lope2 | sure, but then anyone can see what software you're running? | 12:12 |
Lope2 | why not have both? | 12:12 |
Lope2 | konstruktoid, this is weird, any idea why my new installation of ubuntu-server 20.04 is missing sources.list and then when I add it, it says it's missing public keys etc for the official ubuntu repos? | 12:13 |
Lope2 | seems ridiculous? | 12:13 |
konstruktoid | Seems weird yeah | 12:21 |
Lope2 | I dunno what to do... | 12:21 |
konstruktoid | was it an official iso? | 12:23 |
Lope2 | ogra, konstruktoid: https://imgur.com/a/yYhkwV6 | 12:23 |
konstruktoid | never happened to me but you can dowload the keys | 12:23 |
Lope2 | I did download the keys | 12:24 |
Lope2 | but it didn't work. | 12:24 |
Lope2 | See screenshot | 12:24 |
Lope2 | Pretty sure this is what I downloaded... it's the same filename, and I did download it from Ubuntu's website last night. https://releases.ubuntu.com/20.04.5/ubuntu-20.04.5-live-server-amd64.iso | 12:26 |
konstruktoid | ah, but thats for gpg | 12:26 |
Lope2 | konstruktoid, oh, so how do I get the keys then? | 12:26 |
Lope2 | if I run `apt-key list` I've got absolutely nothing. | 12:27 |
konstruktoid | copy the .gpg into /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ | 12:28 |
Lope2 | where will the .gpg be? | 12:28 |
Lope2 | konstruktoid, https://imgur.com/a/AwYIoHZ | 12:30 |
konstruktoid | /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ubuntu-keyring-2012-archive.gpg | 12:30 |
konstruktoid | /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ubuntu-keyring-2012-cdimage.gpg | 12:30 |
konstruktoid | /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ubuntu-keyring-2018-archive.gp | 12:30 |
konstruktoid | on my focal | 12:30 |
Lope2 | yeah, it looks like they're in there already, see my last screenshot ^ | 12:31 |
* konstruktoid sent a code block: https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/fb1ef9cf83f9e47015d827394e449430130f6812 | 12:31 | |
Lope2 | oh shit. /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ubuntu-keyring-2018-archive.gpg is empty | 12:31 |
Lope2 | what's weird is my /etc/apt/sources.list and sources.list.d was also empty. | 12:32 |
Lope2 | What the hell? | 12:32 |
gjolly | hello, does anyone know what is the default/minimum /boot partition size set by the installer (if the user choose FDE?). | 12:33 |
Lope2 | konstruktoid, I'm going to ask on #ubuntu, to see if anyone knows. | 12:34 |
konstruktoid | or download https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/ubuntu-keyring | 12:34 |
konstruktoid | v | 12:34 |
konstruktoid | https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/all/ubuntu-keyring/filelist | 12:34 |
Lope2 | konstruktoid, thank you very much. the problem is I'm wondering what else could be broken in my install, like these issues. | 12:37 |
Lope2 | the guys in #ubuntu think the installer fucked out cos I had no internet during installation. | 12:38 |
konstruktoid | Yeah there's probably others as well | 12:38 |
Lope2 | konstruktoid, reinstalling with internet access from the get-go via DHCP (not manual IP entry) gave me a working installation. | 12:53 |
konstruktoid | Awesome :) | 12:55 |
Lope2 | Thanks for your help :) | 13:04 |
Alexey_ | http://dchub.one:8080/Audio/Браво.torrent Girl & Boy Russian Rock and Roll - advise | 14:27 |
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
=== baldpope_ is now known as baldpope | ||
baldpope | can I set my upstream mirrors to be limited to US based ones? | 18:37 |
sdeziel | baldpope: are you referring to apt mirrors? If yes, there is us.archive.ubuntu.com | 18:39 |
baldpope | would the same apply for us.security.ubuntu.com ? | 18:39 |
sdeziel | baldpope: AFAIK, there is only one security.ubuntu.com, so there is no specific country version of it | 18:40 |
baldpope | ty sdeziel | 18:40 |
sdeziel | baldpope: security.ubuntu.com has multiple A/AAAA records which are split between the UK and the US | 18:42 |
sdeziel | at least, when queried from my place (North America). I see 1 UK server (A/AAAA) and 2 US servers (also with A/AAAA) | 18:42 |
baldpope | yea, I see the set, with 1 matching the same as us.archive.ubuntu.com | 18:44 |
sarnold | do note that sometimes when we do network or server maintenance that we might need to put the uk servers into the us dns entries, to keep services going. there's no *guarantee* that they're the local ones | 19:57 |
ogra | there are two security servers in the us and only one in europe ? | 19:59 |
* ogra wasnt aware ! | 19:59 | |
sarnold | ogra: it should be balanced, two on each side, but banjo's an *extremely* unhappy machine lately :( I think the poor little guy has been half-replaced at this point and still throwing MCEs or something similar :( | 20:08 |
* ogra makes note: USA twice as vulnerable as Europe, needs two security servers ... | 20:09 | |
ogra | probably about time for a full-replace ... | 20:11 |
sarnold | ogra: agreed on my part ;) | 20:15 |
kanashiro[m] | ahasenack: now the other docker.io test is failing in bionic :/ when upgrading the system we get a snapd conffile prompt even with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive | 20:36 |
kanashiro[m] | the original failure was fixed | 20:36 |
kanashiro[m] | https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/ppc64el/d/docker.io/20230202_175258_4281b@/log.gz | 20:36 |
=== Liver-K is now known as Liver_K | ||
ahasenack | kanashiro[m]: is something broken in snapd? | 22:05 |
ahasenack | kanashiro[m]: alternatively, one can issue the apt install with a dpkg option to tell it to keep the old config file (or new) | 22:06 |
kanashiro[m] | ahasenack: I think we need to do something like that | 22:42 |
ahasenack | kanashiro[m]: is the test changing some config in snapd I wonder? It's surprising to get a conf prompt in an automated test | 22:47 |
kanashiro[m] | It uses lxd, need to check if any snapd config is changed | 23:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!