=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
[02:11] <chromebittin> doing some more Swedish translation for the new installer
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
[11:32] <Lope2> Installing Ubuntu-server 20.04. I chose the non-LVM layout option, so it has created 3 partitions instead. Likely boot, swap and rootfs, but I don't know what order it created them in.
[11:32] <Lope2> Now I'm thinking I should have chosen LVM.
[11:34] <Alexey_> ...
[11:34] <Lope2> Oh, I see it only created a single partition and no swap.
[11:34] <Lope2> That's fine. If I want swap I can add another swap disk to the VM
[11:41] <Lope2> how is the network configured in Ubuntu-server 20.04
[11:42] <Lope2> looks like it's not network-manager or ifupdown or systemd network
[11:42] <Lope2> Okay I found it, netplan.
[11:49] <ogra> ubuntu uses swap files by default since a while ... this is why you dont need a swap partition by default (and allows you to dynamiclly add/remove swap space)
[11:57] <Lope2> ogra, yeah, that's more convenient for sure.
[11:58] <Lope2> I've just installed Ubuntu 20.04 and the /etc/apt/sources.list is empty...?
[11:58] <Lope2> sources.list.d is also empty.
[12:01] <Lope2> Does Ubuntu not support https for deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal main
[12:09] <konstruktoid> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archivemirrors
[12:09] <konstruktoid> but no, been discussed now and again and signed packages is where the security is
[12:12] <Lope2> sure, but then anyone can see what software you're running?
[12:12] <Lope2> why not have both?
[12:13] <Lope2> konstruktoid, this is weird, any idea why my new installation of ubuntu-server 20.04 is missing sources.list and then when I add it, it says it's missing public keys etc for the official ubuntu repos?
[12:13] <Lope2> seems ridiculous?
[12:21] <konstruktoid> Seems weird yeah
[12:21] <Lope2> I dunno what to do...
[12:23] <konstruktoid> was it an official iso?
[12:23] <Lope2> ogra, konstruktoid: https://imgur.com/a/yYhkwV6
[12:23] <konstruktoid> never happened to me but you can dowload the keys
[12:24] <Lope2> I did download the keys
[12:24] <Lope2> but it didn't work.
[12:24] <Lope2> See screenshot
[12:26] <Lope2> Pretty sure this is what I downloaded... it's the same filename, and I did download it from Ubuntu's website last night. https://releases.ubuntu.com/20.04.5/ubuntu-20.04.5-live-server-amd64.iso
[12:26] <konstruktoid> ah, but thats for gpg
[12:26] <Lope2> konstruktoid, oh, so how do I get the keys then?
[12:27] <Lope2> if I run `apt-key list` I've got absolutely nothing.
[12:28] <konstruktoid> copy the .gpg into /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/
[12:28] <Lope2> where will the .gpg be?
[12:30] <Lope2> konstruktoid, https://imgur.com/a/AwYIoHZ
[12:30] <konstruktoid> /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ubuntu-keyring-2012-archive.gpg
[12:30] <konstruktoid> /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ubuntu-keyring-2012-cdimage.gpg
[12:30] <konstruktoid> /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ubuntu-keyring-2018-archive.gp
[12:30] <konstruktoid> on my focal
[12:31] <Lope2> yeah, it looks like they're in there already, see my last screenshot ^
[12:31]  * konstruktoid sent a code block: https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/fb1ef9cf83f9e47015d827394e449430130f6812
[12:31] <Lope2> oh shit. /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ubuntu-keyring-2018-archive.gpg is empty
[12:32] <Lope2> what's weird is my /etc/apt/sources.list and sources.list.d was also empty.
[12:32] <Lope2> What the hell?
[12:33] <gjolly> hello, does anyone know what is the default/minimum /boot partition size set by the installer (if the user choose FDE?). 
[12:34] <Lope2> konstruktoid, I'm going to ask on #ubuntu, to see if anyone knows.
[12:34] <konstruktoid> or download https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/ubuntu-keyring
[12:34] <konstruktoid> v
[12:34] <konstruktoid> https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/all/ubuntu-keyring/filelist
[12:37] <Lope2> konstruktoid, thank you very much. the problem is I'm wondering what else could be broken in my install, like these issues.
[12:38] <Lope2> the guys in #ubuntu think the installer fucked out cos I had no internet during installation.
[12:38] <konstruktoid> Yeah there's probably others as well 
[12:53] <Lope2> konstruktoid, reinstalling with internet access from the get-go via DHCP (not manual IP entry) gave me a working installation.
[12:55] <konstruktoid> Awesome :)
[13:04] <Lope2> Thanks for your help :)
[14:27] <Alexey_> http://dchub.one:8080/Audio/Браво.torrent Girl & Boy Russian Rock and Roll - advise
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
=== baldpope_ is now known as baldpope
[18:37] <baldpope> can I set my upstream mirrors to be limited to US based ones?
[18:39] <sdeziel> baldpope: are you referring to apt mirrors? If yes, there is us.archive.ubuntu.com
[18:39] <baldpope> would the same apply for us.security.ubuntu.com ?
[18:40] <sdeziel> baldpope: AFAIK, there is only one security.ubuntu.com, so there is no specific country version of it
[18:40] <baldpope> ty sdeziel 
[18:42] <sdeziel> baldpope: security.ubuntu.com has multiple A/AAAA records which are split between the UK and the US
[18:42] <sdeziel> at least, when queried from my place (North America). I see 1 UK server (A/AAAA) and 2 US servers (also with A/AAAA)
[18:44] <baldpope> yea, I see the set, with 1 matching the same as us.archive.ubuntu.com
[19:57] <sarnold> do note that sometimes when we do network or server maintenance that we might need to put the uk servers into the us dns entries, to keep services going. there's no *guarantee* that they're the local ones
[19:59] <ogra> there are two security servers in the us and only one in europe ? 
[19:59]  * ogra wasnt aware !
[20:08] <sarnold> ogra: it should be balanced, two on each side, but banjo's an *extremely* unhappy machine lately :( I think the poor little guy has been half-replaced at this point and still throwing MCEs or something similar :(
[20:09]  * ogra makes note: USA twice as vulnerable as Europe, needs two security servers ...
[20:11] <ogra> probably about time for a full-replace ...
[20:15] <sarnold> ogra: agreed on my part ;)
[20:36] <kanashiro[m]> ahasenack: now the other docker.io test is failing in bionic :/ when upgrading the system we get a snapd conffile prompt even with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
[20:36] <kanashiro[m]> the original failure was fixed
[20:36] <kanashiro[m]> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/ppc64el/d/docker.io/20230202_175258_4281b@/log.gz
=== Liver-K is now known as Liver_K
[22:05] <ahasenack> kanashiro[m]: is something broken in snapd?
[22:06] <ahasenack> kanashiro[m]: alternatively, one can issue the apt install with a dpkg option to tell it to keep the old config file (or new)
[22:42] <kanashiro[m]> ahasenack: I think we need to do something like that
[22:47] <ahasenack> kanashiro[m]: is the test changing some config in snapd I wonder? It's surprising to get a conf prompt in an automated test
[23:03] <kanashiro[m]> It uses lxd, need to check if any snapd config is changed