[06:42] aren't unmaintained mirrors removed from the mirrors list? [06:44] Znevna, as long as they're kept up-to-date automatically, there is no check on being 'maintained' afaik ;) [06:44] well it's only 3 years behind, does that count as unmaintained? ;) [06:46] haha. i would expect that mirror to be punted from 'the mirror list', yes ;) [06:46] after how many years? :P [06:47] I'm trying to talk with them to see if they can fix it [06:49] rofl [06:50] they know about the issue and are working on it [06:50] since 3 years?:P hilarious [16:07] I've tried, they did nothing [16:07] where do I report broken mirrors? :P [16:24] Znevna: mirrors@ubuntu.com [16:24] Znevna: which mirror list are you talking about ? (also hi !) [16:25] hello! [16:25] ubuntu archive [16:25] w8 [16:26] https://paste.debian.net/plainh/d5f3793a [16:26] the last two entries [16:29] right, so https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+mirror/mirrors.xservers.ro-archive [16:29] hmm [16:30] the status there is the actual status? [16:30] seems wrong [16:32] cjwatson: any idea why the mirror above isn't marked Unofficial ? It has no kinetic, no groovy, no jammy... [16:32] Znevna: seems wrong indeed [16:34] axino: Not sure sorry, the mirror prober is one of the bits of LP I understand least well and I have to go out soon [16:34] axino: Can we have a ticket for it on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad if you think it's wrong? [16:34] cjwatson: sure [16:34] cjwatson: should I mark it Unofficial manually, or will that prevent troubleshooting ? [16:35] axino: same answer :) [16:35] :) [16:35] ok [16:35] I always forget the extremely strange state machine there [20:36] Znevna cjwatson : ticket created at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/704999 [20:36] marking this mirror as "unofficial" now [20:37] or rather, broken [20:38] It also hosts ubuntu releases but that seems to be fine [20:40] using mirrors should be more reliable :P