=== chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
arraybolt3 | Liver_K: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-390/+bug/2006408 | 02:59 |
---|---|---|
-ubottu:#ubuntu-server- Launchpad bug 2006408 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (Ubuntu) "nvidia-uvm module does not exist, making CUDA unusable with the 390 driver" [Undecided, New] | 03:00 | |
Liver_K | Thanks again arraybolt3 | 03:00 |
arraybolt3 | Never heard back from Oblomov, so I tried to describe the problem and put that in the report. If I misunderstood something, lemme know so I can edit it. | 03:00 |
Liver_K | Yeah #opencl is a very very low traffic channel | 03:01 |
Liver_K | Ooo arraybolt3 you should include ocl along with CUDA | 03:02 |
Liver_K | They both require it | 03:02 |
Liver_K | In fact ocl was my intended use case XD | 03:02 |
arraybolt3 | Liver_K: Done. | 03:22 |
Liver_K | Also, what is this "source package" thing it shares with the desktop driver? | 03:24 |
Liver_K | arraybolt3: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 | 03:25 |
arraybolt3 | There's two kinds of packages in Ubuntu - binary and source packages. Binary packages are the things you install, source packages are the source code (or source files) that the binaries are built from. | 03:26 |
arraybolt3 | Oftentimes multiple binary packages are produced by building a single source package. | 03:26 |
Liver_K | Ah I saw "package" and thought immediately of the binary | 03:26 |
Liver_K | arraybolt3: Do you think this bug will actually get fixed? | 03:45 |
Liver_K | Like in the foreseeable future? | 03:45 |
sarnold | ± apt-file search nvidia-uvm.ko | wc -l | 03:46 |
sarnold | 5343 | 03:46 |
sarnold | omg | 03:46 |
sarnold | oh hrm those are all .sig files. | 03:48 |
Liver_K | I mean the sources are there at /usr/src/nvidia-390.157/nvidia-uvm/ | 03:53 |
Liver_K | Dunno what I can do with those if anything | 03:53 |
=== kdas_ is now known as kushal | ||
ahasenack | sdeziel: hi, would you like to give my rsyslog packages with apparmor a try? | 12:43 |
ahasenack | they won't change existing enforcement mode, but the apparmor profile has "news" (documented in d/NEWS and d/README.apparmor) | 12:43 |
ahasenack | on fresh installs, however, it will put the profile in enforce mode | 12:44 |
ahasenack | just won't touch the confimenent mode on upgrades | 12:44 |
ahasenack | it's in https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/rsyslog-apparmor-dep8-take4. The build with the mentioned docs is currently still happening | 12:46 |
ahasenack | I'm dynamically handling mysql, postgresql, gnutls and openssl | 12:46 |
ahasenack | omprog is one I doubt I can handle for now, I would need to be able to properly parse the rsyslog conf to catch that. The conf can be in 3 formats! (very old, old, and rainer script) | 12:47 |
patdk-lap | I'm suprised it's only 3 formats, it feels like every major version is a new config format | 13:54 |
=== esembee_ is now known as esembee | ||
sdeziel | ahasenack: of course, will do! | 14:11 |
ahasenack | patdk-lap: well, it can be 3 formats at the same time, in the same config :) | 14:11 |
patdk-lap | I know, I keep having to change config formats to work around bugs, it's annoying | 14:23 |
=== remolej5 is now known as remolej | ||
inscw00table | I've seen a couple times during an autoinstall from ubuntu-22.04.1-live-server-amd64.iso it fails apt-get install on the first entry in my 'packages' clause, claiming the package is not found. Anyone happen to know how subiquity configures/uses the mirrors setup in the 'apt' section? I find no reference to them in etc/apt on the target install fs as I would have expected. | 17:23 |
=== JanC is now known as Guest2803 | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
effendy[m] | inscw00table: is the package not part of the main ubuntu repository? | 21:28 |
effendy[m] | I'm guessing you're ruling out any syntax problem, like wrongly specifying the version and that? | 21:28 |
=== chris15 is now known as chris14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!