[00:56] <arraybolt3[m]> aaronprisk: Do you have the needed authority or connection to deal with a rather serious situation related to the Wiki? It's security related, I will send details over encrypted DMs if you're available.
[00:56] <arraybolt3[m]> s/connection/connections/
[00:56] <arraybolt3[m]> (It's not a Wiki security issue, but it's a severe security problem for a user of the Wiki.)
[00:57] <arraybolt3[m]> Fallen: ^
[01:03] <aaronprisk[m]> arraybolt3 @arraybolt3:matrix.org: please send me any information you have over DM or email.
[01:03] <arraybolt3[m]> Thanks, incoming.
[01:04] <Bashing-om> aaronprisk[m]: A guery from popey (Alan Pope) from Mastodon >> " Added two more bots to the #Ubuntu mastodon instance: @ubuntu - which gates posts from the Ubuntu official Twitter (for now) (would prefer someone from Canonical owned this and posted human content, but for now that's what this is)"
[01:06] <Bashing-om> query*
[01:07] <Bashing-om> aaronprisk[m]: Is this something in your present role you care to pursue ?
[01:12] <aaronprisk[m]> <Bashing-om> "aaronprisk: Is this something in..." <- Sure, could you DM more information?
[01:22] <Bashing-om> aaronprisk[m]: Do not have more info at this time // What other info should I ask to ne provided ? // I be that go-btween :D
[01:24] <aaronprisk[m]> Bashing-om: I suppose when they would like us to take it over and if there is anything they need from our side to proceed. Thank you, Bashing-om! 
[01:27] <Bashing-om> aaronprisk[m]: In that respect of "taking over" ... would we not need an actual person to take on that responsibility ?
[01:30] <aaronprisk[m]> Bashing-om: Yeah, I believe so. I'm going to ping our social media person and see if they'd want to be responsible or have one of us take the lead.
[01:32] <Bashing-om> aaronprisk[m]: Outstanding - O wait that advisement .. and will so at this time relay ^ back to Mastodon.
[01:36] <arraybolt3> w.r.t the missing Ubuntu Pro signup window in Software and Updates, apparently I was wrong, probably because the VM I was using to check was outdated. There actually is a very nice Ubuntu Pro enablement page in Software and Updates according to https://ubuntu.com/pro/tutorial, so nevermind on that front.
[03:20] <Eickmeyer[m]> <arraybolt3> "w.r.t the missing Ubuntu Pro..." <- The question is, does it exist in the Qt interface? Because I don't see it there.
[03:21] <arraybolt3> Eickmeyer[m]: For one, I don't think so, and for two, it looks like that picture may have just been a mock-up? Because a fully updated Ubuntu Desktop VM over here doesn't have it.
[03:23] <Eickmeyer[m]> arraybolt3: That would be another glaring issue.
[03:23] <Eickmeyer[m]> aaronprisk: ^
[03:24] <Eickmeyer[m]> Not having it in the Qt interface would affect Lubuntu, Kubuntu, and Ubuntu Studio.
=== arraybolt3_ is now known as arraybolt3
[13:33] <ahoneybun[m]> <aaronprisk[m]> "Thank you all for the feedback..." <- I wonder if this helps? https://askubuntu.com/questions/1452299/im-getting-the-message-the-following-security-updates-require-ubuntu-pro-with
[13:34] <ahoneybun[m]> I'm currently looking for a way to disable the message for a customer so I've been looking around more lately.
[13:39] <lotuspsychje> ahoneybun[m]: see also bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1992026
[13:39] <ahoneybun[m]> lotuspsychje: Thanks for the link! I did see that one I was just providing more context but that might not have worked in this case or I missed something.