=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
=== Guest5944 is now known as arraybolt3[m]
[15:59] <jawn-smi1> o/
[15:59] <jawn-smi1> bah, why am I always jawn-smi1
[15:59] <bdrung> \o
[15:59] <ogayot> o/
[15:59] <ginggs> o/
[16:00] <jawn-smith> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
[16:00] <meetingology> Meeting started at 16:00:15 UTC.  The chair is jawn-smith.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[16:00] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[16:00] <jawn-smith> The status is here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-09-february-2023/33804
[16:00] <zhsj> o/
[16:00] <jawn-smith> Let's all take some time to read and ask questions
[16:00] <slyon> o/
[16:00] <schopin> o/
[16:02] <sil2100> o/
[16:02] <enr0n> adrien: Can you elaborate on what "side effects" you are seeing with systemctl show/status WRT bug 2006589?
[16:02] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2006589 in anacron (Ubuntu) "Anacron service and timer disabled after upgrading from 2.3-33" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2006589
[16:05] <adrien> enr0n: it's really weird, basically I would systemctl enable anacron.service and when using systemctl status anacron.service in my postrm script, I would get a "disabled"
[16:05] <adrien> buuut if I systemctl status anacron.service before the postrm (don't know what the latest point was), I would always get "enabled" and I would also get "enabled" from the postrm
[16:07] <adrien> it definitely makes no sense to me
[16:07] <bdmurray> I haven't posted my status but as you might imagine its all autopkgtest infrastructure related
[16:08] <enr0n> adrien: hm okay, I'm having a hard time parsing this right now. Is there a simple reproducer or test case you can show? (We can discuss it more later though)
[16:09] <jawn-smith> #topic Release incoming bugs
[16:09] <jawn-smith>  #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[16:09] <jawn-smith> bug 2003331
[16:09] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2003331 in ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "Can't log in to lunar x11 session" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2003331
[16:10] <adrien> enr0n: well, the anacron patch should reproduce that issue but I haven't try on another machine that mine so I can't tell if it's not a local issue; I'll try to have a look; back to meeting for now
[16:10] <jawn-smith> We've agreed in past meetings that this is a desktop team issue
[16:10] <jawn-smith> So moving on
[16:10] <jawn-smith> bug 2004092
[16:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2004092 in systemd (Ubuntu) "casper fails to add any users because GID 999 is already taken" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2004092
[16:12] <jawn-smith> enr0n: sounds like you're going to investigate this?
[16:12] <jawn-smith> Sounds like enr0n will look into the systemd side of this and dbungert will look into the casper side
[16:13] <dbungert> I can support that
[16:13] <enr0n> jawn-smith: Yeah, the summary is that in either case, casper needs a change so that it does not pick a UID/GID. But I need to look into systemd-sysusers behavior, because it does not allow changing UID boundaries at run time.
[16:14] <jawn-smith> So we've updated the tags to foundations-todo and assigned the bug
[16:14] <jawn-smith> bug 2002871
[16:14] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2002871 in pkgbinarymangler (Ubuntu) "Failed pkgbinarymangler tests with python3.11" [Low, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2002871
[16:15] <jawn-smith> waveform:
[16:16] <waveform> nothing to report on this yet
[16:16] <waveform> hopefully will get to it next week
[16:16] <jawn-smith> Okay, I'll leave it with you then
[16:16] <jawn-smith> That's it for ll
[16:16] <jawn-smith> kk is empty again \o/
[16:16] <jawn-smith> #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[16:16] <jawn-smith> bug 1063589
[16:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1063589 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "update-manager crashed with dbus.exceptions.DBusException in call_blocking(): org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut: Activation of org.debian.apt timed out" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1063589
[16:17] <bdmurray> See comment #8
[16:18] <jawn-smith> bdrung: you usually work on apport right?
[16:18] <bdrung> yes
[16:18] <jawn-smith> Do you have the bandwidth to investigate this?
[16:19] <bdrung> currently no. apport is not related to it.
[16:19] <jawn-smith> Oh it's update manager
[16:20] <jawn-smith> Who usually works on that? enr0n or bdmurray ?
[16:20] <bdmurray> The traceback is really with aptdaemon and dbus
[16:20] <jawn-smith> Should the affected packages be changed in the bug then?
[16:21] <bdmurray> Let me do a little more research into this but priority wise I think it'll not end up on foundations-todo
[16:21] <jawn-smith> Sounds good, thanks Brian
[16:21] <jawn-smith> Moving on then
[16:21] <jawn-smith> bug 1999345
[16:21] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 1999345 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "please add luks2 module to the signed grub2 images" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1999345
[16:22] <jawn-smith> Last we discussed this it was with the security team
[16:23] <jawn-smith> doesn't look like there are any updates to the bug so it appears there's nothing for us to do
[16:23] <jawn-smith> #topic proposed-migration
[16:23] <jawn-smith> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[16:23] <jawn-smith> libarchive is with me
[16:23] <jawn-smith> I have some ideas but need to wait for queues to go down
[16:24] <jawn-smith> llvm-toolchain-14 is with doko
[16:24] <jawn-smith> adrien is working on the MIR for licensecheck
[16:24] <jawn-smith> slyon: Are you still working fuse3 and ostree?
[16:25] <slyon> jawn-smith: yes.. I got stuck
[16:25] <slyon> i created a update-excuse bug if somebody experienced with FUSE wants to have a look
[16:25] <jawn-smith> Anyone experienced with FUSE?
[16:26] <schopin> ginggs: didn't you do the fuse3 migration?
[16:27] <ginggs> i did, but that was more a pestering people job
[16:27] <ginggs> i can take a look though
[16:27] <schopin> I think you're supposed to say "coordinating an archive-wide effort" these days.
[16:27] <jawn-smith> waveform: still working on sbuild right?
[16:27] <waveform> yup
[16:27] <jawn-smith> hooray
[16:28] <jawn-smith> ginggs: you were working on setuptools last time
[16:28] <liushuyu> I am also open to take some proposed migrations
[16:28] <jawn-smith> It still has one regression
[16:28] <ginggs> jenkins-job-builder is fixed, just waiting on autopkgtests
[16:28] <jawn-smith> hooray
[16:28] <jawn-smith> curl has some regressions
[16:28] <jawn-smith> That we didn't assign last week
[16:29] <jawn-smith> Any volunteers?
[16:29] <ginggs> does it?
[16:29] <jawn-smith> oh right those are just waiting
[16:29] <ginggs> aren't those just waiting?
[16:29] <jawn-smith> Reading comprehension skills, yeah
[16:29] <jawn-smith> lsb-release-minimal has some regressions
[16:29] <jawn-smith> waveform: you synced this right?
[16:30] <waveform> yup
[16:30] <jawn-smith> Okay, but it sounds like your plate is already pretty full
[16:30] <jawn-smith> So any volunteers for lsb-release-minimal?
[16:30] <bdrung> i want to take update-manager (this one is related to PEP440)
[16:30] <waveform> oh, I can probably take it anyway
[16:30] <waveform> (I doubt there's much to it)
[16:30] <jawn-smith> Okay sounds great, thanks
[16:31] <jawn-smith> any volunteers for libselinux?
[16:32] <zhsj> i can take it
[16:32] <jawn-smith> Awesome, thanks
[16:32] <adrien> I'm on +1 next week, does that count?
[16:33] <jawn-smith> software-properties is FTBFS
[16:33] <jawn-smith> sounds like perhaps an enr0n task?
[16:33] <bdmurray> Its just python
[16:33] <enr0n> Yeah I will take that
[16:33] <jawn-smith> Thanks
[16:33] <adrien> I can take xz
[16:34] <jawn-smith> I'm working on the icu issues because I did the merge
[16:35] <jawn-smith> So let's talk about glibc
[16:35] <schopin> For glibc, I'll take most of it.
[16:35] <schopin> But I'd like some help for some.
[16:35] <schopin> e.g. libite
[16:35] <jawn-smith> slyon: libite?
[16:35] <slyon> ack
[16:36] <schopin> ipset
[16:36] <jawn-smith> liushuyu: ipset?
[16:36] <zhsj> schopin: i'll see go packages in glibc regression, like delve, mtail
[16:36] <schopin> notcurses
[16:36] <liushuyu> jawn-smith: Okay, I can take ipset
[16:36] <dbungert> schopin: I'm interested in notcurses
[16:37] <schopin> xypron: python-cryptography
[16:37] <xypron> ok
[16:37] <schopin> ogayot: xdp-tools ?
[16:37] <ogayot> ack
[16:38] <schopin> That's it for now, more will probably come when the queues empty up :)
[16:39] <schopin> zhsj: delve and mtail work locally so are probably either victims of the high load of the runners or the fact that the runners seem to use the 6.1 kernel?
[16:39] <jawn-smith> danilogondolfo: Do you want to start hcipping away at the libgd2 regressions?
[16:40] <jawn-smith> lots of "unknown" versions which should just need restarts
[16:40] <danilogondolfo> ack
[16:40] <zhsj> schopin: maybe. (i don't believe glibc can cause go packages regression)
[16:40] <jawn-smith> vpa1977: vim
[16:40] <schopin> zhsj: yeah that was my thought as well.
[16:42] <jawn-smith> juliank: pyicu
[16:42] <jawn-smith> schopin: xfsprogs
[16:42] <schopin> ack
[16:42] <jawn-smith> Sounds like everyone has one now
[16:43] <jawn-smith> at least one
[16:43] <jawn-smith> #topic AOB
[16:43] <zhsj> devscripts seems need a lot of mir
[16:43] <zhsj> oh, not "a lot"
[16:43] <slyon> zhsj: yes. I'm on that
[16:44] <slyon> trying to drop some of the deps first
[16:44] <slyon> and will bring it up to this meeting it it turns out to need real MIRs
[16:46] <zhsj> i want to remove consul. bug #2006724 thoughts?
[16:46] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2006724 in consul (Ubuntu) "Remove consul from lunar" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2006724
[16:48] <jawn-smith> #endmeeting
[16:48] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 16:48:01 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-02-09-16.00.moin.txt
[16:48] <jawn-smith> oh sorry zhsj I didn't see your message
[16:48] <jawn-smith> We'll need an AA to review the bug
[16:48] <jawn-smith> Looks like you already subscribed that team
[16:49] <jawn-smith> sil2100: do you have time to look at this?
[16:49] <zhsj> yes, let's wait more time for AA to review
[16:50] <jawn-smith> v_orlon may be able to review next week
[16:50] <jawn-smith> Okay endmeeting for real now
[16:51] <sil2100> I'll try getting to it but uh, might be hard