[01:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (kinetic-proposed) [27.13.4~22.10.1]
[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [27.13.4~22.04.1]
[01:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [27.13.4~20.04.1]
[01:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [27.13.4~18.04.1]
[01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.13.4~16.04.1]
[09:02] <ricotz> hello ubuntu-archive, looks like python3.11 3.11.2-2 is broken, its installation fails with
[09:02] <ricotz> python3.11-minimal (3.11.2-2) wird eingerichtet ...
[09:02] <ricotz>   File "/usr/lib/python3.11/_sysconfigdata__x86_64-linux-gnu.py", line 46
[09:02] <ricotz>     '
[09:02] <ricotz>     ^
[09:02] <ricotz> SyntaxError: unterminated string literal (detected at line 46)
[09:04] <seb128> doko, ^
[09:16] <seb128> and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030818
[09:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1030818 in python3.11 "3.11.1 and 3.11.2 orig.tar.xz in debian are identical, by accident?" [Normal, Open]
[09:16] <seb128> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/650179842/python3.11_3.11.1-2_3.11.2-1.diff.gz
[09:16] <seb128> seems weird
[09:16] <seb128> ah, the changelog of -2 mentions that but just fail to reference the bug
[09:18] <slyon> doko: ginggs: I'm seeing the same python3.11 build issue with the single quote in _sysconfigdata.py as we had yesterday with the new 3.11.2-2 upload from a few hours ago. Is there anything we can do about it?
[09:18] <slyon> e.g.: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/650560179/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-s390x.fuse3_3.13.0-2build1~ppa0_BUILDING.txt.gz
[09:24] <cpaelzer> slyon: seb128, ricotz: yep starting to see the same creping into all my builds as well. Interestingly only amd64, arm64 and s390x. On armhf and ppc64 it isn't showing the same
[09:25] <seb128> slyon, hey, is that a regression from proposed? if so I think we should delete that update
[09:25] <cpaelzer> Here an example on ppc64el https://launchpadlibrarian.net/650557966/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-ppc64el.libvirt_9.0.0-1ubuntu1~lunarppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz which works
[09:25] <seb128> unless someone stops me I'm going to the delete the update for now, it can come back once it's fixed
[09:25] <cpaelzer> seb128: I'm very much on the same path/decision you are, just doing a few more checks
[09:26] <slyon> seb128: cpaelzer: yeah, it regressed in -proposed. The package was dropped yesterday from -proposed AFAIK, but a new python3.11 upload from this morning seems to trigger the same issue
[09:26] <cpaelzer> yes, 3.11.2-2 is proposed only and I ahve logs of 3.11.1-2 working fine up until recently
[09:26] <seb128> cpaelzer, do you want more time to finish your checks before I press the delete button?
[09:26] <cpaelzer> 3.11.1-2 is in lunar-release
[09:26] <cpaelzer> no seb128, push the button
[09:26] <cpaelzer> all I've looked at is still saying the same that we discussed here
[09:28] <seb128> removed
[09:28] <ginggs> seb128: thanks
[09:30] <cpaelzer> And for the bug itself, it was not a fluke the content really was broken - the file has a single ' in that line
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cd-boot-images-amd64 [source] (jammy-proposed) [20.2]
[09:32] <seb128> if http://launchpadlibrarian.net/650179842/python3.11_3.11.1-2_3.11.2-1.diff.gz had the issue then it's probably not coming from the package itself
[09:33] <seb128> I mean it's python which end up buggy, but in that upload ^ there was no actual content change, so probably a build-depends impacting it?
[09:34] <cpaelzer> seb128: it might be generated at build time
[09:34] <ginggs> i don't think either upload had the problem in debian
[09:35] <cpaelzer> no surprsie in the built debs all matches to the symptom we see https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/ynWhttQSPg/
[09:35] <seb128> cpaelzer, right, but if the same content used to generating right then it's probably impacted by something else that changes in the archive
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-amd64 [source] (jammy-proposed) [20.2]
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-arm64 [source] (jammy-proposed) [16.1]
[09:50] <cpaelzer> The change actually is https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/vV8DGj3sb2/ which is a dump of vars in python3.11/Lib/sysconfig.py (I can't see how that woudl miss a ') followed by  sed magic in d/rules which very much could cause this if our default compiler arguments recently changed (and that would also explain why it might be different in Debian)
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-initial-setup [source] (jammy-proposed) [42.0.1-1ubuntu2.3]
[10:31] <cpaelzer> So trying to remove te package got seb128 disconnected? :-/
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (focal-proposed/universe) [2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.4 => 2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.5] (kernel-dkms)
[11:51] <seb128> back, sorry had to step out on short notice and joy of not having a modern chat system for Ubuntu to stay online while changing location
[11:59] <cpaelzer> wb seb128
[12:26] <ginggs> wb gb seb128 . ANY
[12:26] <ginggs> sorry, debian buildd admin joke :)
[12:32] <seb128> :-)
[12:35]  * cjwatson gives ginggs the "niche joke of the day" award
[12:42] <sil2100> juliank: hey! So re: the cd-boot-images-*, which kernel are we waiting for before we can release those into -updates?
[12:42] <juliank> sil2100: xnox: ^ hey! So re: the cd-boot-images-*, which kernel are we waiting for before we can release those into -updates?
[12:43] <juliank> I wonder if it's just generic kernel because you know that's the one used on the images
[12:43] <juliank> anyhow I don't know it's up to xnox
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvirt [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [9.0.0-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isc-dhcp [source] (jammy-proposed) [4.4.1-2.3ubuntu2.4]
[13:21] <coreycb> bdmurray: I responded on the bug, thanks for looking at that
[13:22] <cpaelzer> seb128: ricotz: ginggs: slyon: doko: FYI that failing python3.11 was due to the debug-prefix-map changing in the generated output, I've left some FYI to help anyone who will look into that in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.11/+bug/2006738
[13:22] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2006738 in python3.11 (Ubuntu) "sysconfigdata__x86_64-linux-gnu.py SyntaxError: unterminated string literal" [Undecided, New]
[13:25] <seb128> cpaelzer, thanks for doing the investigation!
[13:29] <ahasenack> hi ubuntu-archive, the current samba in lunar-proposed has a couple of new binary packages due to a packaging split. The split happened in debian in https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/samba/2:4.17.3+dfsg-4
[13:30] <seb128> ahasenack, hey, yes you already mentioned that yesterday, it's ok and should end up in new queue for review right?
[13:30] <ahasenack> correct
[13:30] <seb128> was there an actual question you had then?
[13:30] <ahasenack> no, just the usual ping whenever a NEW package shows up, and the ping has the explanation, so save the AAs some time
[13:31] <seb128> or is that an indirect way to request a binNEW review you are waiting on?
[13:31] <ahasenack> well, I am waiting on it since it's my task to merge samba from debian, but that's about it
[13:31] <ahasenack> I can only mark that task complete after it migrated
[13:31] <seb128> ahasenack, for the record there is 'usual ping when a NEW package shows up', there is a queue and a bot on the channel announcing things landing in the queue
[13:32] <seb128> sorry, forgot a 'no' there
[13:32] <ahasenack> ok, sorry about the noise
[13:33] <seb128> ahasenack, if you are waiting on something it's fine to ask for a review here though, just if there is no urgency you don't need to bother and can just wait, same as SRUs, someone will eventually get to it
[13:33] <ahasenack> understood
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isc-dhcp [source] (focal-proposed) [4.4.1-2.1ubuntu5.20.04.5]
[13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: veusz (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.3.1-3build1 => 3.5.3-2~22.10] (no packageset)
[14:31] <xnox> sil2100: juliank: in lunar - 6.1 kernel needs to migrate which is stuck behind autopkgtest queue, even though we have fixed all the things for it..... just waiting for results; unless we want to whack it skiptest hint. For jammy - we heed hwe-5.19 kernel to migrate https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/2004157 and need to check what's up with lowlatency (if we need hwe or ga
[14:31] <xnox> one for ubuntu-studio)
[14:31] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2004157 in Kernel SRU Workflow verification-testing "jammy/linux-hwe-5.19: 5.19.0-32.33~22.04.1 -proposed tracker" [Medium, In Progress]
[14:33] <fheimes> Dear @ubuntu-sru - is there chance to get kpatch (currently in kinetic unapproved, since quite a while) unblocked?
[14:34] <sil2100> xnox: I already poked klebers for the lowlatency, it's all spinning
[14:34] <sil2100> (meta respin)
[14:35] <klebers> yep, I'm on it
[14:35] <sil2100> Since studio images failed to build in the morning after me enabling the HWE kernel for everyone
[14:35] <sil2100> xnox: ok, thanks!
[14:43] <xnox> yeah, last time i looked i was not sure if it was intentially using ga kernel or not
[15:00] <enr0n> ubuntu-archive: please see bug 2006621 when you can
[15:00] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2006621 in zeal (Ubuntu) "zeal: Please remove s390x, ppc64el, and riscv64  binaries from lunar" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2006621
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: nim-unicodeplus (lunar-proposed/primary) [0.5.1-2]
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvirt [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [9.0.0-1ubuntu1]
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2:4.17.5+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[15:30] <schopin> xnox: since Steve is away this week, I'm tagging in sil2100 on the rustc bootstrap issue. sil2100 see https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/02/07/%23ubuntu-release.html#t14:38 for some context :)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dahdi-linux [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu12~22.04.1]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: nim-regex (lunar-proposed/primary) [0.17.0+ds-2]
[15:57] <sil2100> schopin: let me try handling that in a moment
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pango1.0 (jammy-proposed/main) [1.50.6+ds-2 => 1.50.6+ds-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:46] <sil2100> schopin: ok, so it looks okay from what I see
[16:47] <sil2100> I'll accept it for lunar. But for jammy, shame the SRU bug is not noted :|
[16:47] <schopin> Yeah, my bad on that one.
[16:47] <sil2100> Please be sure to ping me directly about when the verification is done
[16:48] <schopin> sil2100: will do.
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc-1.62 [sync] (lunar-proposed) [1.62.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu3]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc-1.62 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [1.62.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[16:56] <jbicha> sil2100: could you review pango1.0 for jammy & gdm3 (jammy & kinetic)? Desktop wants to try to get those in for 22.04.2
[17:03] <jbicha> sil2100: actually let me ask ahasenack instead since they are on a better time zone for this ^
[17:03] <xnox> apw:  please nudge linux-meta/linux-signed migration in lunar requesting a binary RM and a skiptest hint with details explained in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2006762
[17:03] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2006762 in linux (Ubuntu) "Please let 6.1 kernel migrate" [Undecided, Incomplete]
[17:22] <sil2100> jbicha: yeah, might be a bit too late for me
[17:22] <sil2100> o/
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [27.13.4~16.04.1 => 27.13.5~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [27.13.4~18.04.1 => 27.13.5~18.04.1] (core)
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (focal-proposed/main) [27.13.4~20.04.1 => 27.13.5~20.04.1] (core)
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (jammy-proposed/main) [27.13.4~22.04.1 => 27.13.5~22.04.1] (core)
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (kinetic-proposed/main) [27.13.4~22.10.1 => 27.13.5~22.10.1] (core)
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (kinetic-proposed) [27.13.5~22.10.1]
[19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [27.13.5~22.04.1]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [27.13.5~20.04.1]
[19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [27.13.5~18.04.1]
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.13.5~16.04.1]
[19:37] <ahasenack> jbicha: pango and gdm3?
[19:38] <ahasenack> they have to go together?
[19:38] <ahasenack> pango just jammy, gdm3 is k/j?
[19:47] <ahasenack> ok, independent
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pango1.0 [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.50.6+ds-2ubuntu1]
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nmap (jammy-proposed/universe) [7.91+dfsg1+really7.80+dfsg1-2build1 => 7.91+dfsg1+really7.80+dfsg1-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[22:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nmap (focal-proposed/universe) [7.80+dfsg1-2build1 => 7.80+dfsg1-2ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcode-tidyall-plugin-clangformat-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.0.2-2] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtemplate-plugin-gettext-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.7-2] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblocale-maketext-extract-dbi-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.01-2] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmarc-mir-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.4-2] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcatmandu-identifier-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.15-2] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libperl-critic-toomuchcode-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.18-2] (no packageset)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-cogent [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [2022.10.31a1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-cogent [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/none) [2022.10.31a1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-cogent [s390x] (lunar-proposed/none) [2022.10.31a1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-cogent [arm64] (lunar-proposed/none) [2022.10.31a1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debuerreotype [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.15-1.1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcode-tidyall-plugin-clangformat-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.0.2-2]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmarc-mir-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.4-2]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtemplate-plugin-gettext-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.7-2]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-cogent [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2022.10.31a1+dfsg-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-cogent [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [2022.10.31a1+dfsg-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcatmandu-identifier-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.15-2]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libperl-critic-toomuchcode-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.18-2]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-cogent [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [2022.10.31a1+dfsg-1]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblocale-maketext-extract-dbi-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.01-2]
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-cogent [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2022.10.31a1+dfsg-1]