[00:33] <OvenWerks> though if anyone "just knows" how to do that, it would be Fons.
[00:35] <Eickmeyer[m]> OvenWerks: I mean, if the jack calls in PW were disabled, it should be fine, right?
[00:35] <OvenWerks> Eickmeyer[m]: to bridge pw to jack you need to open both the pw libjack and the system libjack at the same time
[00:36] <Eickmeyer[m]> Yikes.
[00:37] <Eickmeyer[m]> In other words, it's not currently possible.
[00:38] <OvenWerks> https://stackoverfhttps://stackoverflow.com/questions/678254/what-should-i-do-if-two-libraries-provide-a-function-with-the-same-name-generatilow.com/questions/678254/what-should-i-do-if-two-libraries-provide-a-function-with-the-same-name-generati
[00:39] <OvenWerks> So yes it is "possible"
[00:42] <OvenWerks> So basically one would take the calls that need to be used and rename all of the pw ones to pw-call() using objcopy.
[00:44] <OvenWerks> the other way, might be to use PA calls directly or the pw equivalents. Probably better would be to take whatever bridge PW has already built in and fix it or make it more accessable.
[00:47] <OvenWerks> I wonder how lib-jack-weak does it.
[00:59] <OvenWerks> Actually, it may be possible to just use two threads (well three probably).
[01:01] <OvenWerks> I think the only thing that _has_ to be shared is a ring buffer.
[01:06] <OvenWerks> no thats not true.
[04:13] <Eickmeyer[m]> arraybolt3: Matrix DMs