| === esembee_ is now known as esembee | ||
| Skuggen | mdeslaur: Realize I forgot to respond about the mysqldump issue, sorry. We are acknowledging it as a bug and working on it, yeah | 09:30 |
|---|---|---|
| === emancypage7 is now known as emancypage | ||
| cjwatson | We're switching merges.ubuntu.com over to a new deployment. This should be basically transparent, but the new deployment is bionic rather than precise (!) so please let me know if you spot any oddities | 11:41 |
| cjwatson | (And obviously I'd like to get past bionic, but upgrading by two LTSes in one go was enough for me) | 11:42 |
| mdeslaur | Skuggen: thanks for the update! | 12:09 |
| Elliria | Hey there. Is there a current replacement for the http://packages.ubuntu.com/python-gobject package? | 12:37 |
| cjwatson | Elliria: Nowadays (as in, for the last decade or so) python3-gi plus appropriate gir* packages is the way to go - https://pygobject.readthedocs.io/en/latest/guide/porting.html may be helpful | 12:42 |
| Elliria | Thank you very much, cjwatson! | 12:47 |
| cjwatson | np | 12:47 |
| Elliria | I've been banging my head against this for a while. | 12:48 |
| adrien | I'm on +1 for Foundations and so far I've looked at python3-cssutils (ftbfs due to version being from 2017, commented on debian's BTS and LP bugs already opened), crystal (build-depends on itself, CI on salsa is broken due to that, LP #1998701 already opened but not visible on update_excuses), bettercap-caplets (depends on bettercap-ui which is not packaged and I saw no sign of it getting packaged) | 13:32 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1998701 in crystal (Ubuntu) "FTBFS: circular dependency needs bootstrapping" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1998701 | 13:32 | |
| adrien | and next one I'm going to look at is ocaml-odoc* | 13:47 |
| enr0n | utkarsh2102: just seeing all this now, but thank you for sponsoring | 14:20 |
| === genii_ is now known as genii | ||
| nteodosi | Can I have these autopkgtests triggered, please? https://termbin.com/dtuqu | 15:16 |
| slyon | nteodosi: "You submitted an invalid request: chromium-browser/110.0.5481.77-0ubuntu0.17.04.2 is not published in PPA canonical-chromium-builds/stage bionic" | 15:17 |
| slyon | maybe the publisher did not yet run on the PPA? | 15:18 |
| nteodosi | Hmm I think it was written off once I submitted a new version number? | 15:18 |
| nteodosi | So I'll wait until it finishes building. Thanks anyway slyon. | 15:18 |
| === nteodosi is now known as nteodosio | ||
| slyon | nteodosi: yeah you need to wait for it to finish building and all binary packages to be published (which is usually approx ~1h after finishing the build). Please re-ask for test triggers once all of that is done. | 15:20 |
| nteodosio | slyon, I was not clear. 110.0.5481.77-0ubuntu0.17.04.2 had already built, but thereafter submitted 18.04.2, which is still building. I thought I could run tests against the former. | 16:13 |
| slyon | oh I see. IIRC the src package publisher ran just a few minutes before I tried to click your links. So that might have overriden the former package version | 16:14 |
| nteodosio | Yeah | 16:15 |
| slyon | src pkg is usually published earlier, but only after src+binaries are published we can run the autopkgtest | 16:17 |
| vorlon | bluesabre: is on my list, I'll try to get to it early this week | 16:27 |
| liushuyu | Hi there, can someone help me add a distro release tracking table for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/+bug/2005122 ? I need to track release for LL KK JJ FF and BB | 20:29 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2005122 in rustc (Ubuntu) "Upgrade Rust to 1.66.1" [Undecided, In Progress] | 20:29 | |
| utkarsh2102 | enr0n: no problem, thanks for your work ;) | 20:32 |
| liushuyu | And also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cargo/+bug/2005123. Release for LL KK JJ FF and BB as well | 20:32 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2005123 in cargo (Ubuntu) "Upgrade Cargo to 0.67.1" [Undecided, New] | 20:32 | |
| liushuyu | ... and I probably need to check with the Security Team to see if they are comfortable with pulling LLVM 15 into security pocket with older releases | 20:38 |
| vorlon | liushuyu: as it's a new package that does not take over any existing packages from the release pocket it should be uncontroversial; but you still need to check with them to make it actually happen :) | 21:17 |
| liushuyu | vorlon: Thank you! Will do in the #ubuntu-security channel | 21:18 |
| nteodosio | Can I get these autopkgtests triggered please? https://termbin.com/ym0lc | 22:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!