=== esembee_ is now known as esembee
[09:30] <Skuggen> mdeslaur: Realize I forgot to respond about the mysqldump issue, sorry. We are acknowledging it as a bug and working on it, yeah
=== emancypage7 is now known as emancypage
[11:41] <cjwatson> We're switching merges.ubuntu.com over to a new deployment.  This should be basically transparent, but the new deployment is bionic rather than precise (!) so please let me know if you spot any oddities
[11:42] <cjwatson> (And obviously I'd like to get past bionic, but upgrading by two LTSes in one go was enough for me)
[12:09] <mdeslaur> Skuggen: thanks for the update!
[12:37] <Elliria> Hey there. Is there a current replacement for the http://packages.ubuntu.com/python-gobject package?
[12:42] <cjwatson> Elliria: Nowadays (as in, for the last decade or so) python3-gi plus appropriate gir* packages is the way to go - https://pygobject.readthedocs.io/en/latest/guide/porting.html may be helpful
[12:47] <Elliria> Thank you very much, cjwatson!
[12:47] <cjwatson> np
[12:48] <Elliria> I've been banging my head against this for a while.
[13:32] <adrien> I'm on +1 for Foundations and so far I've looked at python3-cssutils (ftbfs due to version being from 2017, commented on debian's BTS and LP bugs already opened), crystal (build-depends on itself, CI on salsa is broken due to that, LP #1998701 already opened but not visible on update_excuses), bettercap-caplets (depends on bettercap-ui which is not packaged and I saw no sign of it getting packaged)
[13:32] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1998701 in crystal (Ubuntu) "FTBFS: circular dependency needs bootstrapping" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1998701
[13:47] <adrien> and next one I'm going to look at is ocaml-odoc*
[14:20] <enr0n> utkarsh2102: just seeing all this now, but thank you for sponsoring
=== genii_ is now known as genii
[15:16] <nteodosi> Can I have these autopkgtests triggered, please? https://termbin.com/dtuqu
[15:17] <slyon> nteodosi: "You submitted an invalid request: chromium-browser/110.0.5481.77-0ubuntu0.17.04.2 is not published in PPA canonical-chromium-builds/stage bionic"
[15:18] <slyon> maybe the publisher did not yet run on the PPA?
[15:18] <nteodosi> Hmm I think it was written off once I submitted a new version number?
[15:18] <nteodosi> So I'll wait until it finishes building. Thanks anyway slyon.
=== nteodosi is now known as nteodosio
[15:20] <slyon> nteodosi: yeah you need to wait for it to finish building and all binary packages to be published (which is usually approx ~1h after finishing the build). Please re-ask for test triggers once all of that is done.
[16:13] <nteodosio> slyon, I was not clear. 110.0.5481.77-0ubuntu0.17.04.2 had already built, but thereafter submitted 18.04.2, which is still building. I thought I could run tests against the former.
[16:14] <slyon> oh I see. IIRC the src package publisher ran just a few minutes before I tried to click your links. So that might have overriden the former package version
[16:15] <nteodosio> Yeah
[16:17] <slyon> src pkg is usually published earlier, but only after src+binaries are published we can run the autopkgtest
[16:27] <vorlon> bluesabre: is on my list, I'll try to get to it early this week
[20:29] <liushuyu> Hi there, can someone help me add a distro release tracking table for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/+bug/2005122 ? I need to track release for LL KK JJ FF and BB
[20:29] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2005122 in rustc (Ubuntu) "Upgrade Rust to 1.66.1" [Undecided, In Progress]
[20:32] <utkarsh2102> enr0n: no problem, thanks for your work ;)
[20:32] <liushuyu> And also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cargo/+bug/2005123. Release for LL KK JJ FF and BB as well
[20:32] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2005123 in cargo (Ubuntu) "Upgrade Cargo to 0.67.1" [Undecided, New]
[20:38] <liushuyu> ... and I probably need to check with the Security Team to see if they are comfortable with pulling LLVM 15 into security pocket with older releases
[21:17] <vorlon> liushuyu: as it's a new package that does not take over any existing packages from the release pocket it should be uncontroversial; but you still need to check with them to make it actually happen :)
[21:18] <liushuyu> vorlon: Thank you! Will do in the #ubuntu-security channel
[22:27] <nteodosio> Can I get these autopkgtests triggered please? https://termbin.com/ym0lc