=== kees_ is now known as kees
=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc
vorlonbdmurray: deleted the dupes00:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-13-cross [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [3ubuntu1]02:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-13-cross [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [3ubuntu1]02:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-13-cross [i386] (lunar-proposed) [3ubuntu1]02:32
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
bdmurrayRemoving items in the queue w/ python3.11/3.11.2-3 as trigger given its not in -proposed any more03:44
bdmurraypython3.11/3.11.2-1 too03:49
LocutusOfBorgdeal.ii failed with no log...11:03
utkarsh2102vorlon: hi! based on our past discussion, I did the splitting of the seeds; cf: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/43754214:47
utkarsh2102let me know what you think about it.14:48
utkarsh2102hopefully I didn't miss anything :sob::sob:14:48
utkarsh2102s/:sob::sob:/😭😭/g :)14:49
LocutusOfBorgbettercap (2.32.0-1ubuntu1) lunar; urgency=medium15:01
LocutusOfBorg  * No change rebuild to bump version number15:01
LocutusOfBorgebarretto, ^^ why not build1?15:02
LocutusOfBorgmdeslaur, ^^15:02
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging doesn't mention the "build1" situation in its version number recommendations15:34
LocutusOfBorgits a no change rebuild...15:35
LocutusOfBorghow is that a security upload?15:35
jbichaI don't know enough about Go packages to answer, but they released bettercap to jammy-security and needed higher version numbers in every later series15:40
utkarsh2102yes but build1 would've served that purpose, no?15:43
utkarsh2102ubuntu1 stops the auto-sync (unless that was the intention) and adds to the tech-debt.15:44
jbichayes, someone could update the wiki for this16:02
mdeslaurLocutusOfBorg: because the security updated for the releases before it use 1ubuntu0.20.04.1 etc.16:57
LocutusOfBorgyes, but its devel16:57
LocutusOfBorgoh, got it16:57
mdeslaurok :)16:57
mdeslaurand yes, ebarretto is going to have a lot of syncs to do eventually :)16:58
mdeslaur(for those following along, 1- using "build1" would have broken the upgrade because of sort order, 2- the security team tooling uses "ubuntu", and 3- all the packages for the security updates were already built before we wondered what to do for the dev release)17:01
LocutusOfBorgghostscript looks seriously broken?18:05
LocutusOfBorg libgs9 : Depends: libgs9-common (= 9.56.1~dfsg1-0ubuntu3) but 10.0.0~dfsg1-0ubuntu1 is to be installed18:05
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: what is trying to pull in libgs9?  in -proposed this is all replaced with libgs1019:00
vorlon(why does ghostscript continue building a libgs9-common package from ghostscript 10.0.0~dfsg1-0ubuntu1 ? *that* is weird)19:00
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: anyway this damage appears to be present upstream in Debian.19:17
utkarsh2102vorlon: thanks for the comment, I haven’t checked with germinate and I’m afk now. I’ll do tomorrow morning but does the split look fine to you?19:33
vorlonutkarsh2102: any answer I would give is contingent on the tooling showing that the output is correct :)19:47
utkarsh2102vorlon: hehe, gotcha. I’ll run it tomorrow then.20:25
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, I did some rebuilds, and problem is "fixed"22:25

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!