| === kees_ is now known as kees | ||
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| vorlon | bdmurray: deleted the dupes | 00:26 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-13-cross [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [3ubuntu1] | 02:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-13-cross [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [3ubuntu1] | 02:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-13-cross [i386] (lunar-proposed) [3ubuntu1] | 02:32 | |
| === chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
| bdmurray | Removing items in the queue w/ python3.11/3.11.2-3 as trigger given its not in -proposed any more | 03:44 |
| bdmurray | python3.11/3.11.2-1 too | 03:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | deal.ii failed with no log... | 11:03 |
| utkarsh2102 | vorlon: hi! based on our past discussion, I did the splitting of the seeds; cf: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/437542 | 14:47 |
| utkarsh2102 | let me know what you think about it. | 14:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | hopefully I didn't miss anything :sob::sob: | 14:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | s/:sob::sob:/ðŸ˜ðŸ˜/g :) | 14:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | bettercap (2.32.0-1ubuntu1) lunar; urgency=medium | 15:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | * No change rebuild to bump version number | 15:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ebarretto, ^^ why not build1? | 15:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mdeslaur, ^^ | 15:02 |
| jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging doesn't mention the "build1" situation in its version number recommendations | 15:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | its a no change rebuild... | 15:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | how is that a security upload? | 15:35 |
| jbicha | I don't know enough about Go packages to answer, but they released bettercap to jammy-security and needed higher version numbers in every later series | 15:40 |
| utkarsh2102 | yes but build1 would've served that purpose, no? | 15:43 |
| utkarsh2102 | ubuntu1 stops the auto-sync (unless that was the intention) and adds to the tech-debt. | 15:44 |
| jbicha | yes, someone could update the wiki for this | 16:02 |
| mdeslaur | LocutusOfBorg: because the security updated for the releases before it use 1ubuntu0.20.04.1 etc. | 16:57 |
| mdeslaur | *updates | 16:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes, but its devel | 16:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh, got it | 16:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | :) | 16:57 |
| mdeslaur | ok :) | 16:57 |
| mdeslaur | and yes, ebarretto is going to have a lot of syncs to do eventually :) | 16:58 |
| mdeslaur | (for those following along, 1- using "build1" would have broken the upgrade because of sort order, 2- the security team tooling uses "ubuntu", and 3- all the packages for the security updates were already built before we wondered what to do for the dev release) | 17:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ghostscript looks seriously broken? | 18:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | libgs9 : Depends: libgs9-common (= 9.56.1~dfsg1-0ubuntu3) but 10.0.0~dfsg1-0ubuntu1 is to be installed | 18:05 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: what is trying to pull in libgs9? in -proposed this is all replaced with libgs10 | 19:00 |
| vorlon | (why does ghostscript continue building a libgs9-common package from ghostscript 10.0.0~dfsg1-0ubuntu1 ? *that* is weird) | 19:00 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: anyway this damage appears to be present upstream in Debian. | 19:17 |
| utkarsh2102 | vorlon: thanks for the comment, I haven’t checked with germinate and I’m afk now. I’ll do tomorrow morning but does the split look fine to you? | 19:33 |
| vorlon | utkarsh2102: any answer I would give is contingent on the tooling showing that the output is correct :) | 19:47 |
| utkarsh2102 | vorlon: hehe, gotcha. I’ll run it tomorrow then. | 20:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, I did some rebuilds, and problem is "fixed" | 22:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!