| oerheks | *first company to come up with 64bits + 32 bits capable architecture, Itanium already existed | 00:08 |
|---|---|---|
| === dl is now known as Guest5244 | ||
| === atrevix is now known as atrevix__ | ||
| === kubuntu is now known as kubuntu__ | ||
| skramer | Hi guys. Just one question regarding VNC. Two Ubuntu machines (okay, one is 16.04.7, but only internally used) connected via WLAN, but VNC is so slow that it's actually unusable. Connection to another laptop by RDP is working smoothly. Any hints what might be wrong in my configuration? | 13:21 |
| skramer | Actually wanted to switch completely to VNC... | 13:22 |
| skramer | Btw. the VNC connection was always bad. That's actually why I chose RDP at the time | 13:23 |
| skramer | Also, it seems that 22.04 does not memorize the position and size of windows, Whenever it is suspends or just is going to go asleep, windows are in totally different position... | 14:18 |
| skramer | So it seems VNC is dead anyways & I need to stick with RDP | 15:45 |
| IrcsomeBot | <Stefan> Hi guys. Just one question regarding VNC. Two Ubuntu machines (okay, one is 16.04.7, but only internally used) connected via WLAN, but VNC is so slow that it's actually unusable. Connection to another laptop running Endeavour by RDP is working smoothly. Any hints what might be wrong in my configuration? | 15:47 |
| IrcsomeBot | <Stefan> No, I'm not asking for help regarding Ubuntu machines. Just want to understand what makes VNC unusable for me | 15:47 |
| skramer | Sorry... Double post. Did not intend to do so | 15:55 |
| alkisg | skramer: VNC is very slow when there's no connected monitor. If that's the case, tell me to locate the workaround. | 17:26 |
| === Lord_of_Life_ is now known as Lord_of_Life | ||
| skramer | alkisg: There are two different PC's: Laptop + aother PC with monitor conected | 18:11 |
| skramer | alksig: Wlan connection | 18:11 |
| alkisg | skramer: ok if it has a connected monitor then it's not the issue I was talking about | 18:12 |
| alkisg | I'm currently working over wlan/ssh/vnc, with no lag | 18:12 |
| alkisg | *wan, not wlan | 18:13 |
| skramer | alksig: Honestly, I'm trying to work with this "connection" since 14.04. But it never was usable | 18:14 |
| alkisg | skramer: well if it works with rdp but not vnc, something's wrong; did you try with various vnc server and clients? | 18:15 |
| skramer | alksig: Even the newer machines, either server or client, vnc never ever worked | 18:15 |
| alkisg | Which vnc server/clients did you tr? | 18:16 |
| alkisg | try | 18:16 |
| alkisg | Try with x11vnc as the server, and realvnc or tightvnc as the viewer; that's the fastest I've seen | 18:17 |
| skramer | alksig: using KRDC but don't know what the other side - 16.04 - is using | 18:17 |
| skramer | alksig: But even latest EndeavourOS has same problem | 18:17 |
| alkisg | OK, then try the software I suggested to see if it improves things | 18:18 |
| alkisg | It worked fine for me in all distributions, flavors, and desktop environments, except of course for wayland | 18:18 |
| skramer | TightVNC did not get better result on Endeavour :-( | 18:18 |
| alkisg | With x11vnc as the server? | 18:19 |
| skramer | Wayland :-D | 18:19 |
| alkisg | Don't just change the client. Change the server too. | 18:19 |
| alkisg | If you're using wayland, you're doomed | 18:19 |
| alkisg | But 14.04 didn't have wayland... | 18:19 |
| skramer | Of course, did not | 18:19 |
| alkisg | I've been using VNC since 7.04 with no issues | 18:19 |
| skramer | But whoever use Wayland... | 18:20 |
| skramer | alksig: I need to double check client and server tomorrow | 18:21 |
| skramer | alksig: Would be crazy if I did not find out in seven years, though | 18:21 |
| skramer | ;-) | 18:22 |
| alkisg | skramer: you may use "tab" to autocomplete my name correctly if you wish ;) | 18:31 |
| === robert_ is now known as Guest5411 | ||
| === io is now known as Guest3117 | ||
| === jcea1 is now known as jcea | ||
| mmikowski | arraybolt3: "I'm debating going back to Kubuntu after doing some hopping around with other flavors, and would obviously like to have all of the KFocus goodies that came originally." You definitely want the Kubuntu Focus Suite, as we curate kernels, drivers, and desktops. There is also a | 19:34 |
| mmikowski | hardware subsystem that recognizes the hardware signature and configures all the settings for optimal sound, display settings, etc. | 19:34 |
| mmikowski | The USB is blank because we found shipping the ISO on that lead to people using the old build which was not desirable. | 19:35 |
| mmikowski | arraybolt3: Download from https://kfocus.org/try. See installation instructions at https://kfocus.org/wf/reinstall. | 19:42 |
| zorin1 | Anyone know why I can’t post a msg on the forums? | 20:10 |
| arraybolt3 | mmikowski: Ah, OK. So basically I can just use the USB as a USB and get the latest version of the ISO off the kfocus website? Sounds good, and I needed an extra USB anyway :D | 20:50 |
| mmikowski | arraybolt3: Yes! You should be good to go. | 20:51 |
| arraybolt3 | +1, thank you! | 20:52 |
| === wattfan235 is now known as wattfan234 | ||
| === ubuntu is now known as Guest528 | ||
| === fabian is now known as fab161 | ||
| skramer | alkisg: Sorry if I did anything wrong :) | 23:19 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!