zhsjcould someone help retry these autopkgtests https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Jb9Hmv9R9P/04:47
zhsjand retry these builds https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-containers-toolbox/
RAOFDamnit! How do I get sbuild to build against lunar-proposed now?06:57
arraybolt3[m]RAOF (he/they): I know how :)06:58
arraybolt3[m]Hang on one moment...06:58
* arraybolt3[m] sent a code block: https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/003fc6bccf6dbfea89528a24d3711d165cb7da0006:58
arraybolt3[m]Notice the # Proposed enabler spot in my sbuildrc.06:58
arraybolt3[m]I have my fstab for sbuild modified like so:06:59
arraybolt3[m]uh... lemme find it...06:59
RAOFLaunchpad still builds against -proposed, right? sbuild-launchpad-chroot doesn't set up a chroot with the necessary magic???06:59
arraybolt3[m]Launchpad still builds against it, yes.06:59
arraybolt3[m]It does so by apt pinning, which is what I'm doing.06:59
* arraybolt3[m] sent a code block: https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/6f673b608a2df8e2f4c953a87e418eb1185d432006:59
arraybolt3[m]I have a directory bind-mounted in sbuild that holds my enable-proposed script.07:00
arraybolt3[m]And then the script itself is just:07:00
* arraybolt3[m] sent a code block: https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/e64e64eec6af0fa022867a1cfcf49258dbac0f9b07:00
arraybolt3[m]Once all that's in place, sbuild will build against -proposed.07:00
arraybolt3[m]RAOF (he/they): According to an email sent out by paride, "schroots07:01
arraybolt3[m]created by mk-sbuild and sbuild-launchpad-chroot may have -proposed in07:01
arraybolt3[m]sources.list, but that's not going to be used in >= Lunar."07:01
arraybolt3[m]So no, sbuild-launchpad-chroot doesn't do it, but the above hack should.07:02
RAOFSeems like sbuild-launchpad-chroot should do it :P07:02
* RAOF should set up a public LXD image server with preconfigured images for sbuild.07:06
arraybolt3[m]Heh, that would be handy. Oy, I didn't think about the fact that this was designed for schroot, not lxd - no clue how to make lxd work with it.07:07
arraybolt3This is just because I'm curious, but why do autopkgtests take *so long* on Canonical's infra? I can run an autopkgtest locally in ~5 minutes, maybe less, and it takes hours or even days in the cloud.07:33
arraybolt3(I guess more because I'm curious and a bit frustrated :P)07:34
arraybolt3(And yes, it depends on the autopkgtest, but ones that take ~5 minutes or less take hours or days in the cloud.)07:34
ginggsarraybolt3: which package in particular?08:00
arraybolt3ginggs: Mainly lxqt-sudo and lxqt-policykit, I believe.08:10
arraybolt3lxqt-sudo appears stuck on an autopkgtest for lubuntu-update-notifier, which is a very fast autopkgtest locally, but apparently has managed to tie up lxqt-sudo for two days.08:12
arraybolt3Then again I remember now that there were some outages recently so maybe I'm just seeing the results of the system still recovering from that.08:12
ginggsarraybolt3: lxqt-sudo doesn't seem to have an autopkgtest, but i see it08:22
ginggsit's waiting for an autopkgtest for lubuntu-update-notifier08:22
RAOF<arraybolt3[m]> "Heh, that would be handy. Oy..." <- You'd use `sbuild`'s autopkgtest backend.08:23
ginggsso 'test in progress' on the update_excuses page means the test is in the queue08:23
ginggsyou can see it here https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running08:23
arraybolt3Oh, but it's not actually actively running, it's just scheduled to run.08:24
ginggslubuntu-update-notifier {"triggers": ["lxqt-sudo/1.2.0-1ubuntu1"], "submit-time": "2023-02-17 09:39:16"}08:24
arraybolt3For some reason I thought it was taking hours or days just to run :P08:24
ginggsonly days before it actually runs08:24
arraybolt3:facepalm: I even know about that page, I don't know why I didn't check it.08:24
ginggs^ shows it doesn't take very long when it actually runs08:25
arraybolt3That makes sense.08:25
paridearraybolt3, hi, maybe you found it out already, but here is the bug about sbuild-launchpad-chroot not using proposed with lunar: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbuild-launchpad-chroot/+bug/199620509:01
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1996205 in sbuild-launchpad-chroot (Ubuntu) "-proposed schroots not really using -proposed in >= Lunar" [Undecided, New]09:01
mitya57sil2100: Hi! Bileto gives me 500 today (from https://bileto.ubuntu.com/v2/metadata for example).13:22
sil2100ah, carp, I was supposed to ask IS to power-cycle it13:22
mitya57Thank you.13:27
MacSlowGreetings everybody!17:03
mitya57sil2100: and now it seems to work, thanks again!18:17
ubottubdmurray, kanashiro, rbasak, seb128, sil2100, teward, utkarsh2102: DMB ping19:03
=== lesbraz is now known as sbraz

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!