[04:47] could someone help retry these autopkgtests https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Jb9Hmv9R9P/ [04:48] and retry these builds https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-containers-toolbox/0.0.99.3+git20230118+446d7bfdef6a-2 [06:57] Damnit! How do I get sbuild to build against lunar-proposed now? [06:58] RAOF (he/they): I know how :) [06:58] Hang on one moment... [06:58] ``` [06:58] * arraybolt3[m] sent a code block: https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/003fc6bccf6dbfea89528a24d3711d165cb7da00 [06:58] Notice the # Proposed enabler spot in my sbuildrc. [06:59] I have my fstab for sbuild modified like so: [06:59] uh... lemme find it... [06:59] Launchpad still builds against -proposed, right? sbuild-launchpad-chroot doesn't set up a chroot with the necessary magic??? [06:59] Launchpad still builds against it, yes. [06:59] It does so by apt pinning, which is what I'm doing. [06:59] * arraybolt3[m] sent a code block: https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/6f673b608a2df8e2f4c953a87e418eb1185d4320 [07:00] I have a directory bind-mounted in sbuild that holds my enable-proposed script. [07:00] And then the script itself is just: [07:00] * arraybolt3[m] sent a code block: https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/e64e64eec6af0fa022867a1cfcf49258dbac0f9b [07:00] Once all that's in place, sbuild will build against -proposed. [07:01] RAOF (he/they): According to an email sent out by paride, "schroots [07:01] created by mk-sbuild and sbuild-launchpad-chroot may have -proposed in [07:01] sources.list, but that's not going to be used in >= Lunar." [07:02] So no, sbuild-launchpad-chroot doesn't do it, but the above hack should. [07:02] ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ [07:02] Seems like sbuild-launchpad-chroot should do it :P [07:06] * RAOF should set up a public LXD image server with preconfigured images for sbuild. [07:07] Heh, that would be handy. Oy, I didn't think about the fact that this was designed for schroot, not lxd - no clue how to make lxd work with it. [07:33] This is just because I'm curious, but why do autopkgtests take *so long* on Canonical's infra? I can run an autopkgtest locally in ~5 minutes, maybe less, and it takes hours or even days in the cloud. [07:34] (I guess more because I'm curious and a bit frustrated :P) [07:34] (And yes, it depends on the autopkgtest, but ones that take ~5 minutes or less take hours or days in the cloud.) [08:00] arraybolt3: which package in particular? [08:10] ginggs: Mainly lxqt-sudo and lxqt-policykit, I believe. [08:12] lxqt-sudo appears stuck on an autopkgtest for lubuntu-update-notifier, which is a very fast autopkgtest locally, but apparently has managed to tie up lxqt-sudo for two days. [08:12] Then again I remember now that there were some outages recently so maybe I'm just seeing the results of the system still recovering from that. [08:22] arraybolt3: lxqt-sudo doesn't seem to have an autopkgtest, but i see it [08:22] it's waiting for an autopkgtest for lubuntu-update-notifier [08:22] Exactly. [08:23] "Heh, that would be handy. Oy..." <- You'd use `sbuild`'s autopkgtest backend. [08:23] so 'test in progress' on the update_excuses page means the test is in the queue [08:23] you can see it here https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running [08:24] Oh, but it's not actually actively running, it's just scheduled to run. [08:24] lubuntu-update-notifier {"triggers": ["lxqt-sudo/1.2.0-1ubuntu1"], "submit-time": "2023-02-17 09:39:16"} [08:24] For some reason I thought it was taking hours or days just to run :P [08:24] only days before it actually runs [08:24] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/lubuntu-update-notifier/lunar/arm64 [08:24] :facepalm: I even know about that page, I don't know why I didn't check it. [08:25] ^ shows it doesn't take very long when it actually runs [08:25] That makes sense. [09:01] arraybolt3, hi, maybe you found it out already, but here is the bug about sbuild-launchpad-chroot not using proposed with lunar: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbuild-launchpad-chroot/+bug/1996205 [09:01] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1996205 in sbuild-launchpad-chroot (Ubuntu) "-proposed schroots not really using -proposed in >= Lunar" [Undecided, New] [09:03] Thanks! [13:22] sil2100: Hi! Bileto gives me 500 today (from https://bileto.ubuntu.com/v2/metadata for example). [13:22] ah, carp, I was supposed to ask IS to power-cycle it [13:27] Thank you. [17:03] Greetings everybody! [18:17] sil2100: and now it seems to work, thanks again! [19:03] !dmb-ping [19:03] bdmurray, kanashiro, rbasak, seb128, sil2100, teward, utkarsh2102: DMB ping [22:19] re === lesbraz is now known as sbraz