/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/02/23/#ubuntu-devel.txt

mwhudsonErr:241 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 librtmp1 amd64 2.4+20151223.gitfa8646d.1-2build102:16
mwhudson  Undetermined Error [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]02:16
mwhudsonhnnngh02:17
RAOFBah. What was the incantation to get autopkgtest.ubuntu.com to rerun a test with a different set of packages? Mir 2.12.0 and wlcs 1.5.0 are entangled and need to migrate together.05:37
RAOF(Specifically, wlcs 1.5.0 adds new tests, which the existing mir 2.9.0 fails and so wlcs 1.5.0 regresses -release mir, but mir 2.12.0 exposes a bug in wlcs 1.4.0 resulting in mir FTBFSing against 1.4.0)05:38
arraybolt3For some reason I thought there's a command in ubuntu-archive-tools that does something helpful here, but my copy of ubuntu-archive-tools has gone missing somewhere on my SSD and I have enough files that "find | grep ubuntu-archive-tools" is taking its sweet time :-P05:40
RAOFretry-autopkgtest-regressions, yeah.05:41
RAOFI don't need to run it against all proposed, though. I know there's a way to futz with the query string on test resubmission to add a package...05:41
RAOFAlternatively, I can use the script and have the followup question of "how do I get the autopkgtest.ubuntu.com cookie out of my browser?" :)05:42
arraybolt3Ugh.05:42
arraybolt3RAOF: This what you were looking for? https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=RELEASE&arch=ARCH&package=SRCPKG&ppa=LPUSER/PPA&trigger=SRCPKG/VERSION05:45
ginggsRAOF: i'll do it now05:46
RAOFYeah. It's *possible* I just want to have multiple &package fields.05:46
liushuyuHi, I would like to request the removal of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/1.67.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1/ from LL-proposed due to a critical issue described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/+bug/2007642/comments/7 . Is there any AA currently awake?05:47
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2007642 in rustc (Ubuntu) "Upgrade Rust to 1.67.1" [Undecided, In Progress]05:47
RAOFginggs: Cool, thanks. Can I also learn how, so that next time I can self-service? :)05:47
RAOFAm I right in my vague memory that you can just append extra &package=$FOO/$VERSION query parameters to add those to the set?05:48
ginggshttps://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi/?release=lunar&arch=amd64&package=mir&trigger=mir%2F2.12.0-0ubuntu2&trigger=wlcs%2F1.5.0-1ubuntu105:48
ginggsand i'll repeat for the other architectures05:48
RAOFAh, almost correct :)05:49
RAOFTYVM05:49
arraybolt3Sigh. Found my ubuntu-archive-tools copy finally. In a painfully obvious location, hiding in plain sight.05:49
ginggsyou just add extra &trigger= as needed05:49
RAOFYeah, I had the polarity reversed.05:54
RAOFThanks again!05:54
ginggsyw!05:54
schopinIf I have a package P that build-depends on itself (with fairly tight version requirements), is it possible to upload a new version of P that build depends on a version of P that's currently building (and thus not published yet)?08:48
ricotzschopin, restoring the existing build of rustc 1.66.1 would have been possible09:09
schopinOh well.09:10
schopinLive and learn, as they say.09:10
ricotzschopin, I guess you can still ask in #ubuntu-release09:11
ricotzget 1.66.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu2 stopped and removed and reinstate 1.66.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu109:11
ricotzschopin, of course the 1.66.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1 binaries are still in -proposed09:14
ricotzso you can build dep on them as is09:14
schopinWhich means I should be able to upload 1.67 with the patch!09:14
ricotzyes09:15
* schopin goes get some coffee before making any more of a mess09:15
ricotzschopin, see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/1.66.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu209:15
ricotz Missing build dependencies: rustc (<= 1.65.0++)09:16
ricotzlooks like a missing bump09:16
schopinI saw :)09:16
schopinHence my coffee remark09:16
ricotzso don't miss it in 1.6709:16
ricotz<< 1.67.0++09:16
ricotzeven << 1.67.1++09:17
bigonhey, has anyone already looked at writing an apparmor module for geoclue?10:47
bigonon debian I'm ending up with https://paste.debian.net/hidden/b26a72ee/10:48
bigonbut IIRC debian kernel has no D-Bus nor network mediation10:48
danilogondolfoHi all, I'm looking for someone to review/sponsor a merge. Let me know if you have few spare minutes today :) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curl/+bug/200812310:58
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2008123 in curl (Ubuntu) "Please merge 7.88.1-1 into lunar" [Undecided, New]10:58
zhsjcould someone retry these autopkgtests https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/n6TrH3f3Rt/12:03
schopinzhsj: on it.12:06
zhsjschopin: ta12:07
bluesabrevorlon: Who should I ping to take a look at livecd-rootfs/ubuntu-image? It looks like the package is blocked by a failing test: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#livecd-rootfs (trying to move Xubuntu Minimal along)12:21
cpaelzerdannf: do you happen to know or have an idea about https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar/lunar/s390x/e/edk2/20230223_114100_288d2@/log.gz ?12:40
cpaelzerdannf: that works fine if I run it on s390x myself, but seems to reliably fail in the autopkgtest environment12:41
Eickmeyer[m]<bluesabre> "vorlon: Who should I ping to..." <- He's out this week, I've pinged bdmurray about it before, we agreed it's a bad test and something should probably be done about it, but I don't know what.15:08
bluesabre<Eickmeyer[m]> "He's out this week, I've..." <- Gotcha. Thanks for the follow-up!15:30
Eickmeyer[m]bluesabre: It affects Edubuntu as well, so we're highly interested in getting this one through!15:31
bdmurrayjawn-smith: Have you looked at the ubuntu-image failure blocking the migration of livecd-rootfs? mwhudson was talking about it yesterday15:55
jawn-smithbdmurray: looks to be a failure in live-build15:57
jawn-smithideally we'll be removing that package from the archive soon and then problem solved15:57
jawn-smithubuntu-image, not livecd-rootfs15:57
bdmurrayjawn-smith: Failure in live-build? When finally getting to a "good" log I see it timing out - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar/lunar/amd64/u/ubuntu-image/20230222_163615_eac4a@/log.gz15:59
jawn-smithbdmurray: Both of the retriggers that mwhudson did yesterday had the following error: Did not expect an error, got Error running command "/usr/bin/lb build": exit status 116:03
bdmurrayjawn-smith: before that there is a network issue getting a package though16:08
jawn-smithnetwork issues could definitely cause failures in lb16:09
bdmurrayE: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/python-idna/python3-idna_2.8-1_all.deb  Undetermined Error [IP: 91.189.91.39 80]16:09
bdmurrayThat's why I went back further16:09
jawn-smithCould it be the infrastructure having network problems?16:09
nteodosiohttps://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=amd64&package=edk2&trigger=libisoburn%2F1%3A1.5.4-4ubuntu1 please?16:27
nteodosioNevermind that, seems it was already retriggered but excuses page is slow.16:29
danilogondolfoMay I ask someone to retry this autopkgtest for me, please? https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=amd64&package=glibc&trigger=glibc/2.37-0ubuntu1&trigger=libcap2/1%3A2.66-3ubuntu217:09
schopindanilogondolfo: .17:12
danilogondolfoschopin: thanks!17:12
vpa1977Hi, would it be possible to retry https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=amd64&package=openjdk-lts&trigger=harfbuzz%2F6.0.0%2Bdfsg-3build1 ? The failure is in jtreg test timeout (which happens occasionally). Long term solution is limiting the test run to tier1/2 tests of the openjdk.19:44
enr0nCan a core dev please retry this test? https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=s390x&package=update-manager&trigger=ubuntu-release-upgrader%2F1%3A23.04.219:47
bdmurrayI'm clicking both of those19:55
enr0nthanks!20:00
vpa1977bdmurray: Thank you !!!!20:13
arraybolt3https://dpaste.com/FVVSMW4GB The apport autopkgtest triggered by qterminal is failing on these errors it appears. However no changes to the packaging were made that I would think could cause this, and it looks like something's timing out and causing the failure. I don't know hardly anything about the guts of apport, so I don't know if this is actually qterminal's fault or not.20:18
bdmurrayI'm not sure it would fix it but there is a new version of apport which passed its own tests20:20
arraybolt3I see tons of "warning: Memory read failed for corefile section, 4096 bytes at 0xffffffffff600000." in the logs.20:22
arraybolt3https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar/lunar/amd64/a/apport/20230223_023204_c2321@/log.gz20:22
arraybolt3Idk. I'll try and reproduce locally to see if it's just a slow tester causing a timeout or something.20:23
arraybolt3bdmurray: Well I can't reproduce the autopkgtest failure locally with the version in -proposed, and I can't seem to get pull-lp-source to give me the version that's in the -release, so I guess I'll just wait for the new version to migrate and then try again.21:35
arraybolt3Hah, the newer version is failing on the same test on a different arch with a timeout!21:36
bdmurrayIt looks dbungert triggerd apport with qterminal and something else21:40
dbungertI ran a few tests earlier, all the things that retry-autopkgtest-regressions were suggesting for trigger=lsb21:47

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!