-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rust-bindgen-0.56 (jammy-proposed/primary) [0.56.0-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]01:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubelt [sync] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.3-2]01:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubelt [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [1.2.3-2] (no packageset)01:15
=== khfeng_ is now known as khfeng
ginggsarighi is not here, but silx is another package affected by IncompleteRead(300565 bytes read, 2070 more expected) with kernel in proposed05:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: python-line-profiler (lunar-proposed/primary) [4.0.2-1]05:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtmir [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.8.0~git20230223.bd21224-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-qt-packages)06:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtmir [armhf] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.8.0~git20230223.bd21224-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-qt-packages)06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtmir [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.8.0~git20230223.bd21224-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-qt-packages)06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtmir [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.8.0~git20230223.bd21224-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-qt-packages)06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtmir [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.8.0~git20230223.bd21224-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-qt-packages)06:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-15 (jammy-proposed/main) [1:15.0.6-3~ubuntu0.22.04.2 => 1:15.0.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] (i386-whitelist)07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-15 (kinetic-proposed/main) [1:15.0.6-3~ubuntu0.22.10.2 => 1:15.0.7-0ubuntu0.22.10.1] (i386-whitelist)07:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtmir [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.8.0~git20230223.bd21224-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-qt-packages)07:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (focal-proposed/main) [2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.6 => 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.7] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, xorg)07:46
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, thanks btw do you think we can now remove mariadb-10.6=08:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:]11:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:]11:36
ginggsarighi:  silx is another autopkgtest affected by IncompleteRead(300565 bytes read, 2070 more expected) with kernel in proposed11:37
arighiginggs, ok I'll do some tests also with silx, I haven't been able to reproduce the problem locally yet :(11:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xlnx-firmware [arm64] (lunar-proposed/multiverse) [2022.1-4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:54
arighiginggs, can you post the link of a log where this failure is happening? I'd like to see if we can find relevant kernel info in there12:01
ginggsany of the recent failures https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/python-fabio/lunar/amd6412:04
ginggsor https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/silx/lunar/amd6412:04
ginggsor do you want a link to a specific log?12:04
arighiginggs, that is perfect, thanks12:05
=== dbungert1 is now known as dbungert
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (jammy-proposed/main) [1.0.20210914-1ubuntu2 => 1.0.20210914-1ubuntu2.22.04.0] (no packageset)13:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.0.20210914-1ubuntu2 => 1.0.20210914-1ubuntu2.22.10.0] (no packageset)13:40
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: net-snmp (jammy-proposed/main) [5.9.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2.5 => 5.9.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2.6] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)14:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: net-snmp (kinetic-proposed/main) [5.9.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.3 => 5.9.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.4] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)14:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: net-snmp (bionic-proposed/main) [5.7.3+dfsg-1.8ubuntu3.8 => 5.7.3+dfsg-1.8ubuntu3.9] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)14:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: net-snmp (focal-proposed/main) [5.8+dfsg-2ubuntu2.6 => 5.8+dfsg-2ubuntu2.7] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)14:30
LocutusOfBorgxnox, I syncd fakeroot, the only delta was the explicit enable of testsuite on riscv6414:31
LocutusOfBorgcan we just "meh" that delta and forget?14:32
LocutusOfBorgyou already said that it was ok to drop it like one year ago, but I continued keeping it :D14:32
LocutusOfBorgand since 19 jan 2022, the first merge I did with just that part of the delta (we had the chat on that day), the testsuite on riscv64 has never failed14:33
LocutusOfBorgso, I think its ok to drop14:33
LocutusOfBorg(and in case of riscv64 specific issues, we can have a look at debian builds anyway)14:33
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: Ubuntu builders don't run dh_auto_test for riscv64 currently14:44
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, I know14:51
LocutusOfBorgthe delta of fakeroot is "enable it regardless of the fact that Ubuntu builders disabled it"14:52
jbichacool, I didn't know we could do that14:54
LocutusOfBorgDEB_BUILD_OPTIONS := $(filter-out nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))16:17
LocutusOfBorgmeh :D16:18
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, ^^16:18
utkarsh2102sil2100, vorlon: hi! when we see the definition of server-minimal seed (cf: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/seeds/ubuntu.jammy/server-minimal), we see that it has some Recommends (needrestart, unattended-upgrades) but at the same time we have " * feature: no-follow-recommends", too. Does it mean that anything that's explicitly added as a Recommends (via () in the seed definition), it's taken in? even if we have "feature:16:18
utkarsh2102no-follow-recommends", too?16:18
philroche^ specifically in the context of the use of `add_package` in livecd-rootfs16:19
bdmurrayarighi: Did you get anywhere with that http issue ginggs was talking about the other day? Would it help if it were to setup a system in scaling stack for you?16:31
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: mariadb-10.6: it's still in Debian and there are still binaries built from it (it's not an "obsolete source package" in Debian's terms).  I'm not keen to futz with it16:54
vorlonutkarsh2102: I don't know, there are probably bugs, I have seen misbehavior with no-follow-recommends but I don't remember the details.  Perhaps mwhudson can weigh in16:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (kinetic-proposed) [3.9.13-1ubuntu0.22.10.1]17:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.9.13-1ubuntu0.22.04.1]17:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (focal-proposed) [3.8.2-0ubuntu1.4]17:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.18 => 2.765.19] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (kinetic-proposed) [20.10.21-0ubuntu1~22.10.2]18:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (jammy-proposed) [20.10.21-0ubuntu1~22.04.2]18:25
xnoxvorlon:  livecd-rootfs sru needed ^18:27
vorlonso much for arm64 queue clearing in ~24h :/18:33
vorlonxnox: 'arm64+*' looks wrong18:35
vorlonxnox: but consistent with amd64, sooo18:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.765.19]18:37
xnoxvorlon:  tah.18:38
vorlonxnox: please land your MP18:39
xnoxvorlon:  i think it is $(ARCH)+$(SUBARCH) with subarch being empty, meaning we are doing a build for `arm64+` so go figure, hopefully.18:39
xnoxvorlon:  also was going to trigger a build out of my ppa to see if i get things that far.18:39
vorlonadrien: fyi the only thing blocking boost1.74 now that I can see is a ledger-autosync autopkgtest failure on arm64 against current ledger, and ginggs has already triggered a retry so it's in the queue and possibly nothing to be done for the next day or so18:41
utkarsh2102vorlon: I mean, if the server-minimal seed is right, that’d mean no-follow-recommends + actually depending on some recommends should still recommend something, isn’t it?18:48
vorlonutkarsh2102: yes? maybe? I don't know the intended semantics, or if there are any intended semantics or just emergent behavior18:51
vorlonutkarsh2102: in practice I see that both tasks and metapackages are honoring the recommends from this file so I guess we should move forward with that18:52
adrienvorlon: ok, I'll keep an eye on it18:58
adrienbtw, it seems llvm-toolchain-13 is problematic; I don't know if it has been spotted by someone else18:58
vorlonadrien: problematic how? it was discussed yesterday and a badtest hint added for it on arm6418:59
adrienproblematic in the sense that it keeps on failing19:00
adrien(I didn't look at that today so I didn't spot changes until now)19:00
adrienbut I now see that ocaml has been able to migrate19:01
vorlonyeah, that's why the hint was added19:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bind9 [source] (focal-proposed) [1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.13]19:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (jammy-proposed/main) [ =>] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)19:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (focal-proposed/main) [ =>] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)20:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [ =>] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)20:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sddm (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.19.0-3ubuntu1.1 => 0.19.0-3ubuntu1.2] (kubuntu)20:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sddm (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.19.0-2ubuntu2.2 => 0.19.0-2ubuntu2.3] (kubuntu)20:36
Eickmeyerubuntu-sru: I have an SRU regression, opened bug 2009074, fixes have been uploaded.20:37
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2009074 in sddm (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU Regression] SDDM display inset patch crashes" [Critical, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200907420:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (xenial-proposed/main) [3.168.19 => 3.168.20] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)20:38
arraybolt3Eickmeyer: In case it's helpful, I added myself as affected after testing.20:55
Eickmeyerarraybolt3: Well, it is really only affecting people with mismatched monitor resolutions.20:56
Eickmeyerarraybolt3: But yes, thenks.20:56
ahasenackEickmeyer: doesn't this completely invalidade the previous sru? That script was obviously never run back then21:05
Eickmeyerahasenack: Clearly, the people doing the testing were still using a bash injection (the sh script was still calling a bash script in their testing), which means the test was faulty.21:07
EickmeyerI'm not too pleased either.21:07
EickmeyerI got dropped this this morning and was quite put-off.21:07
Eickmeyer(I don't even have a setup to duplicate the original bug)21:08
ahasenackhow would that injection happen? I'm not familiar with how Xsetup works21:08
ahasenackthe package is shipping the script with /bin/sh, so where would bash be invoked instead?21:09
EickmeyerXsetup is called by sddm as a setup script when sddm launches Xorg. It calls whatever the shebang invokes.21:09
EickmeyerBy default, that would be #!/bin/sh21:09
EickmeyerHowever, the Kubuntu Focus people had a downstream fix by injecting that script calling another script which had a shebang of #!/bin/bash which did everything in the original SRU's patch.21:10
EickmeyerI brought that patch in (as Kubuntu Focus was my employer at the time), however missed that the original shebang was #!/bin/sh and could not handle arrays.21:11
EickmeyerSo, that's how the regression happened. Long-story short, it doesn't really matter how, it's there now, it just has to be fixed. This fixes it.21:12
Eickmeyerahasenack: ^21:12
ahasenackI may be able to test that, I'm on kinetic, and have 3 displays21:12
EickmeyerCool, but they have to be varying resolutions.21:12
ahasenackthat's easy to do full hd to 4k in all of them21:12
EickmeyerRight, is that default resolution variance? Because sddm doesn't care, it'll go to full default res.21:13
ahasenacknot sure what you mean with default resolution variance. I can select the resolution of each display separatedly21:13
ahasenackI was expecting to do that, then install sddm, select it as the login manager, reboot, and expect it to go nuts when it finds the setup21:14
EickmeyerOh. What I mean is mixed resolutions. Meaning one display has 1080p, one has 4k, etc.21:14
ahasenackyeah, normally they are the same, but I can mix21:14
Eickmeyersddm will automatically go full res on all unless you have a way to override that on the hardware.21:14
ahasenacktheir native resolution is 4k (well, of the two monitors, the 3rd display is the laptop itself, I think that's something 2k+, hidpi, not 4k proper)21:14
EickmeyerOk, the laptop res might be the factor then.21:15
ahasenackright, the laptop at full res will be different from the monitors at full res21:15
EickmeyerPerfect, that's a good test case.21:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sddm [source] (kinetic-proposed) [0.19.0-3ubuntu1.2]21:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sddm [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.19.0-2ubuntu2.3]21:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (focal-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu614.4 => 20101020ubuntu614.5] (core)21:29
vorlonbdmurray: d-i in focal-proposed is critical path for 20.04.6 ^21:29
vorlonahasenack: ^^ since I see you around and processing SRUs... if you have time :)21:37
bdmurraySince I'm still here and ahasenack ran away - I'll do look.22:23
bdmurrayyeah! "do look"22:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (focal-proposed) [20101020ubuntu614.5]22:26
vorlonbdmurray: ta22:35
vorlonkilling current britney run, the archive just published removal of the nvidia/i386 binaries needed in order to let linux migrate23:35
sergiodjcan I have a review of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-elpa/+bug/2008919 when it's most convenient, please?23:44
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2008919 in dh-elpa (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Implement support for 'buttercup_eval'" [Undecided, New]23:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected jtreg7 [source] (lunar-proposed) [7.1.1+1-0ubuntu1]23:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubelt [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.2.3-2]23:45
sergiodjunfortunately the state of some Emacs packages is not ideal, so I'm in this uphill battle to fix them and make dh-elpa migrate23:45
sergiodjthis FFe is one of the things I need to achieve that23:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-line-profiler [sync] (lunar-proposed) [4.0.2-1]23:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!