/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2023/03/09/#lubuntu-devel.txt

kgiiiJust a quick confirmation (I just finished testing, finally...) the software preferences opens with the correct tab @arraybolt3. So, yup, it's taken care of.02:29
arraybolt3\o/ Thanks!02:29
Psil0[m]1Hey 07:17
arraybolt3Psil0[m]1: o/07:18
guivercG'day Psil0[m]1 07:19
lubot[telegram] <Roberalz> https://gitlab.com/wayfireplugins/lxqt-desktop-shell.git14:10
arraybolt3Never heard of the author before but that looks cool.17:19
arraybolt3Weren't the LXQt devs hoping for their stuff to be compositor-agnostic though? I mean I guess that's a pretty small compatibility layer at first glance.17:19
lubot[telegram] <Roberalz> It seems that it is so, but they want to take steps towards wayland (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <arraybolt3> Weren't the LXQt devs hoping for their stuff to be compositor-agnostic though? I mean I guess that's a pretty small compatibility layer at first glance.)17:21
arraybolt3This doesn't even look like an LXQt dev, so I'm curious to see what they came up with and how well it works.17:23
arraybolt3However, IMO, it would probably be a bad idea to use an LWQt solution that isn't supported by upstream LXQt, even if it was as a "technology preview" or something like that.17:24
arraybolt3Then again, if the author is an LXQt dev, maybe this is how they're doing things and we should go for it.17:24
arraybolt3Looks like the plugin author is discussing wayland stuff upstream17:26
arraybolt3tsujan: "Yes, but with the current state of affairs — and considering the current state of layer-shell-qt — it's the best solution." Speaking of this Wayfire plugin on https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt/issues/1017:30
-ubottu:#lubuntu-devel- Issue 10 in lxqt/lxqt "Wayland support" [Open]17:30
arraybolt3OK, this looks like the way they're going.17:30
arraybolt3Looks like we may have Wayland support in 23.10 if things keep moving at that speed :D17:37

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!