[02:29] <kgiii> Just a quick confirmation (I just finished testing, finally...) the software preferences opens with the correct tab @arraybolt3. So, yup, it's taken care of.
[02:29] <arraybolt3> \o/ Thanks!
[07:17] <Psil0[m]1> Hey 
[07:18] <arraybolt3> Psil0[m]1: o/
[07:19] <guiverc> G'day Psil0[m]1 
 https://gitlab.com/wayfireplugins/lxqt-desktop-shell.git
[17:19] <arraybolt3> Never heard of the author before but that looks cool.
[17:19] <arraybolt3> Weren't the LXQt devs hoping for their stuff to be compositor-agnostic though? I mean I guess that's a pretty small compatibility layer at first glance.
 It seems that it is so, but they want to take steps towards wayland (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <arraybolt3> Weren't the LXQt devs hoping for their stuff to be compositor-agnostic though? I mean I guess that's a pretty small compatibility layer at first glance.)
[17:23] <arraybolt3> This doesn't even look like an LXQt dev, so I'm curious to see what they came up with and how well it works.
[17:24] <arraybolt3> However, IMO, it would probably be a bad idea to use an LWQt solution that isn't supported by upstream LXQt, even if it was as a "technology preview" or something like that.
[17:24] <arraybolt3> Then again, if the author is an LXQt dev, maybe this is how they're doing things and we should go for it.
[17:26] <arraybolt3> Looks like the plugin author is discussing wayland stuff upstream
[17:30] <arraybolt3> tsujan: "Yes, but with the current state of affairs — and considering the current state of layer-shell-qt — it's the best solution." Speaking of this Wayfire plugin on https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt/issues/10
[17:30] -ubottu:#lubuntu-devel- Issue 10 in lxqt/lxqt "Wayland support" [Open]
[17:30] <arraybolt3> OK, this looks like the way they're going.
[17:37] <arraybolt3> Looks like we may have Wayland support in 23.10 if things keep moving at that speed :D