| vorlon | cjwatson: ok the memory upgrade sorted it | 02:20 |
|---|---|---|
| === chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
| vorlon | cjwatson: there is code in archive-reports to update all chdist configs but there is nothing in the archive opening or EOL checklists for initializing chdists, I find no helpers for doing the initialization, the last series that snakefruit had these for was impish, and the only explanation of what they're used for is proposed-migration for the devel series, which is no longer true. Is there any | 04:24 |
| vorlon | reason for me to port this over? | 04:24 |
| vorlon | (should I perhaps prune the code altogether? chdists are useful but unused on snakefruit so it seems unnecessary to have them there) | 04:24 |
| vorlon | oh | 04:26 |
| vorlon | mwhudson: ^^ ok so actually the find-rcbuggy-problem-packages script (which I'd forgotten about, showing how much I use its output) invokes chdist but um that's been failing for over a year so....? | 04:30 |
| vorlon | cjwatson, mwhudson: created a branch-chdist helper script (not really branching but whatever) and adding it to the release opening templates now | 04:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon thanks!, so, libcurl-nss move to universe please? | 07:41 |
| tjaalton | sil2100: looks like I need to backport xorg-server from kinetic to jammy after all, as nvidia has hardcoded the version in their driver to know that a bug has been fixed and enables a feature based on that, so a backported commit won't help. bug 2009767 | 08:54 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2009767 in xorg-server (Ubuntu Jammy) "external HDMI monitor is laggy on NV reverse PRIME system" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2009767 | 08:55 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | without bileto fixing riscv64 is a bad thing... | 09:54 |
| RikMills | ^ +1 | 10:04 |
| cjwatson | vorlon: From my perspective they were mainly for occasional manual investigation (as well as at one point for some kind of autopkgtest integration for proposed-migration, as you say). If people aren't using or updating them then I have no issue with them being dropped | 10:15 |
| cjwatson | vorlon: I don't quite remember, but it's quite possible this was essentially a selfish setup on my part due to having terrible home internet at the time and quite often needing to use those chdists for investigation; neither of those factors is an issue any more | 10:16 |
| RikMills | again there are a lot of tests 'running' on excuses, but not queued, running, or with results on the webui | 10:20 |
| RikMills | all the recently finished test on autopkgtest.ubuntu.com front page seem to be manually triggered ones | 10:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu WSL [Focal 20.04.6] (4414650941) has been added | 10:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (focal-proposed/main) [11ubuntu5.6 => 11ubuntu5.7] (core, i386-whitelist) | 11:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-cuda-toolkit [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [11.8.0-2] | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-cuda-toolkit [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [11.8.0-2] | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-cuda-toolkit [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [11.8.0-2] | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntustudio-default-settings [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [23.04.21] | 11:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tzdata [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2022g-7ubuntu2] | 11:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (focal-proposed) [11ubuntu5.7] | 11:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-numpy-groupies [sync] (lunar-proposed) [0.9.20-1] | 11:24 | |
| tjaalton | what happened to linux-doc:i386? nvidia-390 tests are failing on i386 because of it missing | 11:27 |
| LocutusOfBorg | can we do please something related to meson/blacklisted armhf test? | 11:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, linux-doc is installable? | 11:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | unless you are in a multiarch environment, in that case the fault might be linux-libc-dev not being installable | 11:32 |
| tjaalton | they started failing on all releases roughly the same time as here https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/nvidia-graphics-drivers-390/lunar/i386 | 11:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.15.19 => 20.04.15.20] (core) | 11:39 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2009355 | 11:50 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2009355 in linux (Ubuntu Lunar) "linux-libc-dev is no longer multi-arch safe" [Critical, Confirmed] | 11:50 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | so not this bug? | 11:50 |
| tjaalton | not sure, it affects at least jammy and kinetic too | 11:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | why is somebody even trying to install linux-doc? | 11:53 |
| tjaalton | dunno | 11:53 |
| tjaalton | it comes via a recommends | 11:54 |
| tjaalton | the kernel | 11:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.15.19 => 20.04.15.20] (core) | 11:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.20] | 12:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.20] | 12:02 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | since britney seems too lazy to kick autopkgtests, I'll do again for them | 12:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | lazy britney is lazy | 12:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-apt (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.1 => 2.0.1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 12:14 | |
| kanashiro[m] | could someone from the release team take a look at this FFe bug? LP #2011481 | 12:24 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2011481 in pacemaker (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Depend on pcs and suggest crmsh" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2011481 | 12:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-apt [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.1ubuntu0.20.04.1] | 12:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.40 => 1:20.04.41] (core) | 12:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-loompy [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.0.7+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 12:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-loompy [s390x] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.0.7+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 12:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-loompy [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.0.7+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 12:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-loompy [arm64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.0.7+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 12:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.41] | 12:48 | |
| athos | Hi! I recently filed 2 FFe. The first is for rebuilding isc-kea with a more strict shlibs file since we do not ship a symbols file there: LP: #2011341 | 13:08 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2011341 in isc-kea (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Build kea with a more strict shlibs file" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2011341 | 13:08 | |
| athos | The second is for re-enabling LTO for squid in s390x: LP: #2011494 | 13:09 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2011494 in squid (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Re-enable LTO for s390x builds" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2011494 | 13:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: esda [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2] (no packageset) | 13:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flox [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.6.7-1] (no packageset) | 13:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: webkit2gtk [i386] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.39.91-1ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 14:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected webkit2gtk [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2.39.91-1ubuntu1] | 15:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected webkit2gtk [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [2.39.91-1ubuntu1] | 15:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected webkit2gtk [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [2.39.91-1ubuntu1] | 15:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted webkit2gtk [i386] (lunar-proposed) [2.39.91-1ubuntu2] | 15:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected webkit2gtk [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2.39.91-1ubuntu1] | 15:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted webkit2gtk [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [2.39.91-1ubuntu1] | 15:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected webkit2gtk [i386] (lunar-proposed) [2.39.91-1ubuntu1] | 15:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flox [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.6.7-1] | 15:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted esda [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2.4.3-2] | 15:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-loompy [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [3.0.7+dfsg-2] | 15:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-loompy [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [3.0.7+dfsg-2] | 15:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-loompy [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [3.0.7+dfsg-2] | 15:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-loompy [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [3.0.7+dfsg-2] | 15:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sarsen [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.9.3+ds-2] (no packageset) | 17:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spaghetti [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.7.2-1] (no packageset) | 17:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sarsen [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.9.3+ds-2] | 17:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spaghetti [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [1.7.2-1] | 17:11 | |
| ricotz | vorlon, hello, could you take another look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2009354 | 19:45 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2009354 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.4.6 for kinetic" [High, Incomplete] | 19:45 | |
| vorlon | ricotz: my SRU shift doesn't come up again until Friday, I don't have time today to look at it. But unless the packaging has changed wrt the symbols, my feedback there remains the same. Rene is a great developer but we don't blindly trust packaging changes from ANYONE in an SRU. | 19:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (focal-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu614.5 => 20101020ubuntu614.6] (core) | 19:51 | |
| ricotz | vorlon, ok, please reject the current libreoffice uploads from the kinetic queue | 19:53 |
| vorlon | sil2100, bdmurray: I'm self-accepting debian-installer ^^ | 19:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (focal-proposed) [20101020ubuntu614.6] | 19:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1] | 19:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1] | 19:55 | |
| kanashiro[m] | could someone from the release team take a look at this FFe bug? LP #2011481 TIA! | 20:14 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2011481 in pacemaker (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Depend on pcs and suggest crmsh" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2011481 | 20:14 | |
| seb128 | kanashiro[m], sounds like it's going to be another cycle of struggling because release team is understaffed, overworked and not onboarding new members to resolve the issue :-/ | 20:20 |
| vorlon | dude | 20:21 |
| vorlon | I just acked the FFe | 20:21 |
| vorlon | and we are onboarding another new member this cycle as well | 20:22 |
| seb128 | vorlon, it's like the 5th ping about that one I read on the channel | 20:22 |
| seb128 | but thanks for reviewing it | 20:22 |
| seb128 | just to give some context to my comment | 20:23 |
| seb128 | and it's nice you onboard a new member but we should have onboarding at least one new member by cycle for last $n cycles in reality :/ | 20:24 |
| seb128 | it's still an improvement though so I'm not going to complain | 20:24 |
| vorlon | seb128: ftr I find 3 pings, one yesterday, one at 5am my time. If a 1-day turnaround is insufficient, it's better to highlight people | 20:25 |
| seb128 | vorlon, alright, sorry for jumping the gun, I'm still frustrated from the experience of getting FFes reviewed in the past cycle | 20:26 |
| kanashiro[m] | vorlon: thank you! | 20:27 |
| bdmurray | When we looked at the queue this morning there were only 2 new ones and ginggs and vorlon have been on top of them | 20:27 |
| kanashiro[m] | I understand people have other important stuff to do, that's why I try to avoid highlighting them directly | 20:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Focal 20.04.6] (20101020ubuntu614.6) has been added | 20:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Focal 20.04.6] (20101020ubuntu614.6) has been added | 20:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Focal 20.04.6] (20101020ubuntu614.6) has been added | 20:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Focal 20.04.6] (20101020ubuntu614.6) has been added | 20:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Focal 20.04.6] (20101020ubuntu614.6) has been added | 20:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (kinetic-proposed/main) [1:7.4.4-0ubuntu0.22.10.2 => 1:7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 20:42 | |
| ricotz | bdmurray, hello :), could you take over https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2009354 ? | 20:44 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2009354 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.4.6 for kinetic" [High, Incomplete] | 20:44 | |
| === hloeung_ is now known as hloeung | ||
| vorlon | bdmurray, ginggs: https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/focal/daily-live/20230314.3/focal-desktop-amd64.iso passes, releasing to focal-updates | 21:28 |
| vorlon | er wait | 21:29 |
| vorlon | ok no unwait | 21:29 |
| vorlon | flavor leads: I'm not sure there's been much communication about this, but there was an email from Łukasz to ubuntu-devel about the fact that we're doing a 20.04.6 point release. This is a do-over of 20.04.5 for amd64-only because 20.04.5 had an already-revoked bootloader on it when it went out | 22:41 |
| vorlon | we are including flavors, so flavors also have not-revoked install media for 20.04 | 22:42 |
| vorlon | candidate images should start appearing soon-like? | 22:42 |
| * bdmurray looks at the topic | 22:43 | |
| vorlon | and if you can help test them, great; if not, we'll make sure it gets done. The delta from .5 to .6 should be small... new kernel, new debian-installer for the boot bits, no installer changes | 22:43 |
| === vorlon changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 22.10 Kinetic Kudu, 22.04.1 Jammy Jellyfish | Archive: Open | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Linetic Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or whiskey | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you will be missed | ||
| === vorlon changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 22.10 Kinetic Kudu, 22.04.2 Jammy Jellyfish | Archive: Open | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Linetic Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or whiskey | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you will be missed | ||
| vorlon | oh; I didn't see notifications here of it, but candidate images are already appearing: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/443/builds | 22:46 |
| cjwatson | Linetic? :) | 22:46 |
| vorlon | :) | 22:46 |
| vorlon | Kinetic->Linetic->Lunetic->Lunatic->Lunar | 22:46 |
| === vorlon changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 22.10 Kinetic Kudu, 22.04.2 Jammy Jellyfish | Archive: Open | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Lunar Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or whiskey | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you will be missed | ||
| bdmurray | I see a couple of portmanteaus there | 22:47 |
| * cjwatson donnes ses lunettes | 22:48 | |
| cjwatson | *donne, bah | 22:48 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: well, of course the nvidia stuff means Ubuntu .6 is 500M bigger than .5 | 22:49 |
| cjwatson | getting used to Mattermost message editing letting me make it look as if I can type things correctly first try | 22:49 |
| vorlon | haha | 22:49 |
| vorlon | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/443/builds/274038/testcases where are my test cases | 22:49 |
| vorlon | mmmm this is because we renamed Ubuntu Desktop to Ubuntu Desktop (Legacy) since 20.04.5 | 22:50 |
| vorlon | so daily-live registers itself as Ubuntu Desktop but that's wrong | 22:51 |
| arraybolt3 | vorlon: I can't speak for the other flavors, but Lubuntu does not intend on having a 20.04.6 point release (as agreed by a quorum of Lubuntu Council members). There's less than a month of support left for 20.04 and the testing involved isn't really worth it. | 22:52 |
| vorlon | arraybolt3: ok | 22:52 |
| arraybolt3 | (However I am excited to see RC images since I'm wanting to help test Ubuntu Desktop.) | 22:53 |
| vorlon | sigh I think I just have to cowboy etc/qa-products to get this to post | 23:02 |
| vorlon | alright, cowboyed | 23:09 |
| vorlon | mm. while the symlink is *now* correct on the cdimage-master local mirror, the Ubuntu Desktop 20230314.4 clearly has the wrong grub | 23:26 |
| vorlon | soooo respinning | 23:26 |
| vorlon | I'll check the non-daily-live builds; they were built separately/later and might be ok | 23:27 |
| vorlon | yah ubuntu server boots | 23:34 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!