| Saviq | OK so that's a bit dum-dum, Snapcraft won't let you built with a `build-provider: ` that doesn't exist. But it will, with a channel that does. Except SnapD will still fail to install:... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/c7174987fe0112339e9a30980f2951bf6bee24de>) | 09:02 |
|---|---|---|
| alan_g[m] | Yeah, I've complained about it in the past. | 09:07 |
| alan_g[m] | You have to install manually | 09:08 |
| Saviq | But I think you at least could build with a snap not-in-stable, now you can't | 09:34 |
| Saviq | And then if you do use a channel, you can't install the built snap… | 09:35 |
| Saviq | So the only real option is to just omit the default provider bit | 09:35 |
| Saviq | (or well, release to stable) | 09:36 |
| alan_g[m] | Well, I've installed mesa-core22/edge and then I can install the consumer snaps built with .../edge | 09:36 |
| Saviq | OK yeah, you can install first, but that doesn't help that much | 09:37 |
| Saviq | Snapcraft should probably just let things through despite default-provider not being there at built time | 09:37 |
| alan_g[m] | +1 | 09:37 |
| Saviq | Filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapcraft/+bug/2012057 | 09:44 |
| Saviq | And will modify everything to default-provider: mesa-core22 | 09:44 |
| Saviq | Ugh. But that will make them not build 🤦♂️ | 09:48 |
| Saviq | Will leave it at /edge for now, then | 09:49 |
| alan_g[m] | Would it break anything to promote mesa-core22 to stable? (It doesn't need to be public) | 12:26 |
| Saviq | No, but it also wouldn't help much until we publish them under a single publisher (no auto-connection) | 12:27 |
| Saviq | But yeah at least it would install | 12:27 |
| Saviq | OK done, it's on stable now | 12:36 |
| alan_g[m] | Testing OSK I discovered that the keyboard appears at the top of the display. Doesn't seem to be the core22 changes though. Can you reproduce? | 13:58 |
| Saviq | Worked fine when I tried in Miriway, will try a real session | 13:58 |
| alan_g[m] | Seems to be a difference between Frame/edge and Frame/stable | 14:01 |
| alan_g[m] | Frame/beta also shows it wrong | 14:03 |
| alan_g[m] | And candidate! | 14:04 |
| alan_g[m] | I'm using it with frame-it (with osk=enable) | 14:05 |
| Saviq | Yeah, that I can reproduce | 14:11 |
| Saviq | Will leave it with you, digging into our tests crashing on Pi4 with core22 | 14:27 |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/ubuntu-frame]** AlanGriffiths opened [pull request #132](https://github.com/MirServer/ubuntu-frame/pull/132): Fix OSK... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/5ea577b94cc2dd68afcedd04a16ac3727e31be6d>) | 15:14 | |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq opened [issue #2870](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/issues/2870): `mir_performance_tests` crashing on armhf on 22.04... (full message at <https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/libera.chat/283a9e076ebb3d35bd9716ba5ce8eae53e1b27f9>) | 16:07 | |
| alan_g[m] | So the question is, do we fix Frame now, or just roll it into the Mir 2.13 update | 16:17 |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/ubuntu-frame]** bors[bot] edited [pull request #132](https://github.com/MirServer/ubuntu-frame/pull/132): [Merged by Bors] - Fix OSK | 16:26 | |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/ubuntu-frame]** bors[bot] closed [pull request #132](https://github.com/MirServer/ubuntu-frame/pull/132): [Merged by Bors] - Fix OSK | 16:26 | |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/ubuntu-frame]** Saviq assigned to [pull request #132](https://github.com/MirServer/ubuntu-frame/pull/132): [Merged by Bors] - Fix OSK | 16:30 | |
| -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/wlcs]** wmww requested a review from RAOF for [pull request #277](https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs/pull/277): Test XDG shell (stable) version 5 | 16:37 | |
| Saviq | sophie https://github.com/MirServer/mir-ci/actions/runs/4264568386/jobs/7814456136?pr=5#step:8:2342 is now running a locally-built egmde in a loop, you should be able to SSH with: | 17:43 |
| Saviq | ```plain | 17:43 |
| Saviq | ssh QWqADaOdUoyPynH99AXU:MWNlNmQ0OGEudm0udXB0ZXJtLmludGVybmFsOjIyMjI=@uptermd.upterm.dev | 17:43 |
| Saviq | ``` | 17:43 |
| Saviq | But of course it's now been running for a few minutes and no crash… | 17:44 |
| Saviq | We may just put egmde to rest over this. | 17:48 |
| sophie-w | Saviq: uhh, do I need keys for that? | 17:53 |
| Saviq | I imported your LP ones? | 17:53 |
| sophie-w | hmm, didn't work | 17:53 |
| Saviq | Ah, meh, they'd need to be imported on the server side of this… too late | 17:54 |
| Saviq | Anyway, nothing to see there as it didn't segfault… | 17:55 |
| sophie-w | ok makes sense, confirmed that my launchpad pubkey is up to date and correct | 17:57 |
| Saviq | There's one important difference here - egmde is classic, so it's running with the host's (22.04) bits around. | 18:01 |
| Saviq | But pulling the host back to 20.04 doesn't help | 18:08 |
| Saviq | Trying one last thing - building on 20.04 rather than 22.04 | 18:15 |
| Saviq | OK that worked | 18:51 |
| Saviq | Will get an env you can SSH into | 18:51 |
| Saviq | sophie can you `ssh KcZqYeJT6gAFKoZPWlYc:MWNlNmQ0OGEudm0udXB0ZXJtLmludGVybmFsOjIyMjI=@uptermd.upterm.dev`? | 19:39 |
| Saviq | You can ;) | 19:40 |
| sophie-w | I can | 19:41 |
| Saviq | OK I'll get it to the point where the issue can be reproduced and let you know | 19:43 |
| Saviq | sophie OK it's all yours, looping over tests now - of course it's now happily chugging along. | 20:15 |
| sophie-w | Thanks! have a good evening | 20:19 |
| sophie-w | and weekend | 20:19 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!