[00:53] <vorlon> I think we're going to want to do something with germinate-output so that it doesn't regenerate every file in the tree every and force it to be rsynced due to timestamp updates
[01:14] <vorlon> right, that should be better than remotely rsyncing 56GiB of unchanged germinate data every 6 hours
[01:19] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg, RikMills: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/log/lunar/ is available now
[01:19] <vorlon> (a little stale while I work through the other rsync stuff, but)
[03:02] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: do you have time to file an upstream bug about it? https://bugs.webkit.org/enter_bug.cgi Start with WebKit > WebKitGTK
[03:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (focal-backports/universe) [1.24.5-1~bpo20.04.1 => 1.25.0-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset)
[03:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: limnoria (jammy-backports/universe) [2023.1.12-1~bpo22.04.1 => 2023.1.28-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)
[03:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (jammy-backports/universe) [1.24.5-1~bpo22.04.1 => 1.25.0-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)
[03:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yt-dlp (jammy-backports/universe) [2023.02.17-1~bpo22.04.1 => 2023.03.04-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)
[03:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (kinetic-backports/universe) [1.24.5-1~bpo22.10.1 => 1.25.0-1~bpo22.10.1] (no packageset)
[15:31] <vorlon> rsync to the ubuntu-archive-team frontend seems to be under control now; we're no longer generating a 56GiB diff every 6 hours by touching every file under germinate-output.  so update_excuses is current and should stay that way
[15:56] <ginggs> vorlon: thanks!
[18:14] <vorlon> bdrung: have you seen the fun of rdate regressing ubiquity?
[18:27] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Same token, but ubuntu-advantage-tools has a nearly one-month regression on update-manager via bug 2008280
[18:27] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2008280 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "regression: update-manager 1:23.04.1 no longer installs any updates (lunar)" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2008280
[18:27] <Eickmeyer> They're waiting on an FFe via bug 2011757
[18:27] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2011757 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.14" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2011757
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (bionic-backports/main) [1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo18.04.1 => 1:7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1~bpo18.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (focal-backports/main) [1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~bpo20.04.1 => 1:7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1~bpo20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (jammy-backports/main) [1:7.4.4-0ubuntu0.22.10.2~bpo22.04.1 => 1:7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1~bpo22.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:44] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: ummm bugfixes don't require FFes
[18:44] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Yeah, I don't know if the u-a-t team understands that.
[18:44] <vorlon> oh but the FFe is for a full upstream update with unrelated changes
[18:45] <vorlon> well I'm not going to delve into it for a review today
[18:45] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, Saturday, understandable.
[18:47] <Eickmeyer> I'd just *hope* they get that reviewed and in before beta since that's killing update-manager.
[18:48] <vorlon> an SRU shouldn't be blocked on them having landed the package in lunar either, the requirement is simply that it's demonstrable that it *will* be fixed in the devel series
[18:49] <Eickmeyer> Exactly. There's nothing blocking them here.
[19:13] <ricotz> vorlon, hi :), the "badtest libreoffice/i386" hint seems to be required for focal/jammy/kinetic too
[19:13] <ricotz> see https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libr/libreoffice/kinetic/i386
[19:14] <ricotz> I meant https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/kinetic/update_excuses.html#libreoffice
[20:08] <vorlon> ricotz: hint added for kinetic
[20:21] <ricotz> ty
[23:14] <teward> vorlon: can I get an FFe for a sync?  Is that the same process as just requesting a sync?
[23:15] <teward> torbrowser-launcher is FUBAR in Lunar unless we pull an update from Debian
[23:19] <Ukikie> Hello!  xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin was removed from Debian, #1018985.  Will Ubuntu automatically pick that up too? :P
[23:45] <Eickmeyer> debian bug 1018985 Ukikie ? I'd imagine not until the autosync is turned on again after MM opens up.
[23:45] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1018985 in ftp.debian.org "RM: xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin -- ROM; Obsolete upstream, functionality merged into systray plugin" [Normal, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1018985
[23:46] <Eickmeyer> Ukikie: Usually one has to file a removal bug in Ubuntu as well.