| vorlon | teward: FFe is to file a bug and subscribe ~ubuntu-release | 00:04 |
|---|---|---|
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: removals are not handled by the auto-sync | 00:04 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: Yeah, I realized that after I posted that, and realized it requires a removal bug. | 00:05 |
| teward | vorlon: ack i'll file the bug (looks like requestsync has the -e flag for that) - and see if we can't get this in. | 00:05 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: ok. and no, you don't have to file a removal bug for a package removed from Debian unstable | 00:05 |
| teward | that will fix a critical level bug in the package (E:UNUSABLE) and from there I can poke the TB and Release teams for a one time exception to copy the package to the older releases since thte latest breakage was nasty. (I'm looking into whether this is snappable) | 00:06 |
| teward | (for the long term future) | 00:06 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: I think Ukikie's worry is that they don't want it removed for this release. | 00:06 |
| vorlon | teward: if the package is currently broken then it doesn't need an FFe. FFe is for features not bugfixes | 00:07 |
| teward | vorlon: therein lies the chaos | 00:07 |
| teward | it's *not* just a bugfix release | 00:07 |
| teward | it includes other changes in the system for translations, additional feature changes, etc. because of a full v bump | 00:07 |
| teward | (and upstream doesn't have separate feature branches) | 00:07 |
| vorlon | teward: ok but if the current package is *unusable* then there's no risk of regression and no need for an FFe | 00:08 |
| teward | vorlon: ack, so, JFDI then with the sync with my coredev? | 00:08 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: well anyway, that one was blocked from removal because it was seeded. Now that it's no longer seeded, I'll remove it right now (<-- Ukikie) | 00:09 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: I see. ack | 00:09 |
| * Eickmeyer is learning details | 00:12 | |
| teward | vorlon: given that the package is broken (#2000077 indicates download URLs are broken and this also breaks the launcher functioning on upload and can't be used to spawn *new* torbrowser sessions in userspace as designed) I just did the syncpackage call and that looks like it's accepted for Lunar | 00:15 |
| teward | the only Ubuntu specific deltas I noticed were the pull from upstream of a python float strict check but that's fixed now in upstream so heh. | 00:16 |
| teward | (in case anyone asks) | 00:16 |
| teward | guiverc: see above RE your poke on that bug on the 13th. | 00:17 |
| Ukikie | vorlon: Thanks! | 00:17 |
| * guiverc smiles; thanks all ! | 00:18 | |
| === arraybolt3_ is now known as arraybolt3 | ||
| === chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: speaking of, Debian removed muon as 'abandoned upstream' but several flavors still seed it including ubuntustudio; can that be dropped? | 05:12 |
| === bandali is now known as mab | ||
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: There's a case where I'd rather wait until next cycle as it works rather well. I'll be sad to see that one go as it is superior to Synaptic in many ways. | 15:36 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: ok (this is exactly why we don't automatically remove seeded packages that are dropped in Debian) | 18:07 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: And I knew that, which is why I second-guessed myself yesterday. 😅 | 18:08 |
| Eickmeyer | I do understand, however, that it will have to be dropped as there's a new package called muon that needs to be introduced. | 18:08 |
| Bashing-om | UWN: Issue779 up for review and final edits: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue779 :D | 19:44 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: hmm do you know what consumes /proposed-migration/$series/autopkgtest-results.cache ? currently inaccessible because it's a symlink to outside the ~/public_html tree and therefore not being synced | 19:57 |
| mwhudson | good morning | 20:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.6] has been marked as ready | 21:19 | |
| === mab is now known as bandali | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!