[00:04] teward: FFe is to file a bug and subscribe ~ubuntu-release [00:04] Eickmeyer: removals are not handled by the auto-sync [00:05] vorlon: Yeah, I realized that after I posted that, and realized it requires a removal bug. [00:05] vorlon: ack i'll file the bug (looks like requestsync has the -e flag for that) - and see if we can't get this in. [00:05] Eickmeyer: ok. and no, you don't have to file a removal bug for a package removed from Debian unstable [00:06] that will fix a critical level bug in the package (E:UNUSABLE) and from there I can poke the TB and Release teams for a one time exception to copy the package to the older releases since thte latest breakage was nasty. (I'm looking into whether this is snappable) [00:06] (for the long term future) [00:06] vorlon: I think Ukikie's worry is that they don't want it removed for this release. [00:07] teward: if the package is currently broken then it doesn't need an FFe. FFe is for features not bugfixes [00:07] vorlon: therein lies the chaos [00:07] it's *not* just a bugfix release [00:07] it includes other changes in the system for translations, additional feature changes, etc. because of a full v bump [00:07] (and upstream doesn't have separate feature branches) [00:08] teward: ok but if the current package is *unusable* then there's no risk of regression and no need for an FFe [00:08] vorlon: ack, so, JFDI then with the sync with my coredev? [00:09] Eickmeyer: well anyway, that one was blocked from removal because it was seeded. Now that it's no longer seeded, I'll remove it right now (<-- Ukikie) [00:09] vorlon: I see. ack [00:12] * Eickmeyer is learning details [00:15] vorlon: given that the package is broken (#2000077 indicates download URLs are broken and this also breaks the launcher functioning on upload and can't be used to spawn *new* torbrowser sessions in userspace as designed) I just did the syncpackage call and that looks like it's accepted for Lunar [00:16] the only Ubuntu specific deltas I noticed were the pull from upstream of a python float strict check but that's fixed now in upstream so heh. [00:16] (in case anyone asks) [00:17] guiverc: see above RE your poke on that bug on the 13th. [00:17] vorlon: Thanks! [00:18] * guiverc smiles; thanks all ! === arraybolt3_ is now known as arraybolt3 === chris14_ is now known as chris14 [05:12] Eickmeyer: speaking of, Debian removed muon as 'abandoned upstream' but several flavors still seed it including ubuntustudio; can that be dropped? === bandali is now known as mab [15:36] vorlon: There's a case where I'd rather wait until next cycle as it works rather well. I'll be sad to see that one go as it is superior to Synaptic in many ways. [18:07] Eickmeyer: ok (this is exactly why we don't automatically remove seeded packages that are dropped in Debian) [18:08] vorlon: And I knew that, which is why I second-guessed myself yesterday. 😅 [18:08] I do understand, however, that it will have to be dropped as there's a new package called muon that needs to be introduced. [19:44] UWN: Issue779 up for review and final edits: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue779 :D [19:57] bdmurray: hmm do you know what consumes /proposed-migration/$series/autopkgtest-results.cache ? currently inaccessible because it's a symlink to outside the ~/public_html tree and therefore not being synced [20:30] good morning [21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.6] has been marked as ready === mab is now known as bandali