=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)06:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [i386] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)06:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [armhf] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)06:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [arm64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)06:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)06:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)06:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [s390x] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)10:08
georgiagubuntu-sru: is the soft freeze of focal still in place? I was hoping we could get the SRU for bug 1994146 released11:39
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1994146 in apparmor (Ubuntu) "[SRU] apparmor - Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199414611:39
ItzSwirlzhi release people, a few cinnamon 5.6x point releases have been made with bug fixes. However, it is not just cinnamon that could use a requestsync, but a couple other packages, maybe about 3-5 total. Is that okay at this point close to beta?11:44
* ItzSwirlz wonders why i said "release people" and not "release team"11:44
ItzSwirlzI got class, so if anyone responds i'll check irclogs o/11:49
tsimonq2Depends on what the "couple other packages" are ;)11:56
seb128LocutusOfBorg, hey, did you have any luck with webkigtk? did you report the issue upstream?12:12
LocutusOfBorgseb128, not yet, I don't really understand what is going on, and why only on armhf12:14
LocutusOfBorgsomewhere I think we can add the dependency on surf on mesa and live happy for now12:14
LocutusOfBorgbut I don't want to hide a real issue12:14
LocutusOfBorgI just finished phpldapadmin NMU work and upload, will come back to this soon I hope12:15
seb128LocutusOfBorg, thanks12:15
LocutusOfBorgseb128, debian uploaded 2.40 in debian, with same issue12:22
LocutusOfBorgI'll open an RC bug to them and let them work on it?12:22
seb128LocutusOfBorg, ideally we would also report it upstream12:29
LocutusOfBorgseb128, I still don't understand if it is an upstream issue or not...12:30
seb128it takes 3 days for that package to build on riscv, so we can't just sit and wait for too long or we will not have it fixed for beta12:30
LocutusOfBorgand to which component (ANGLE? core?)12:30
seb128well let's start by Debian then...12:30
seb128do they also have failing autopkgtests?12:30
LocutusOfBorgsame issue12:30
LocutusOfBorgI openen an RC and will ask on irc12:30
seb128on which channel? just curious so I can keep an eye on the discussion12:31
LocutusOfBorgfor now12:33
LocutusOfBorgin any case I would like to upload 2.40.0-2 to Ubuntu12:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnu-efi (kinetic-proposed/main) [3.0.13+git20210716.269ef9d-2ubuntu1 => 3.0.15-1~22.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)12:36
Ukikie(Debian #1033230)12:36
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1033230 in src:webkit2gtk "webkit2gtk: version 2.39.90-1 lost its libgles2 runtime dependency" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/103323012:37
renanrodrigoHello, everyone; we have a new version of ubuntu-advantage-tools coming in, and this time it is concurrent with the lunar freezes (afaik the beta freeze starts today) We have a FFE open (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2011757). a) is this FFE enough to get it through? b) Could someone please approve it :D  ?14:59
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2011757 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.14" [Undecided, New]14:59
arraybolt3renanrodrigo: Beta Freeze isn't for several more days.15:03
arraybolt3See https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lunar-lobster-release-schedule/2728415:03
arraybolt3Starts March 27, today is March 20.15:03
renanrodrigoperfect - we will upload before that for sure15:04
renanrodrigos/upload/make best effort to upload/15:04
coreycbhello sru team, we have some openstack packages that could use some attention: aodh in jammy unapproved, neutron in focal (verified), and heat in kinetic/jammy (verified)15:05
Eickmeyerarraybolt3: Beta freeze is always the monday before beta release.15:08
EickmeyerSo, one week from today. :)15:08
Eickmeyer(You are correct, sir!)15:09
arraybolt3Eickmeyer: Funny thing, Beta Freeze is documented in the release schedule, but Beta Release isn't :P15:09
Eickmeyerarraybolt3: It sure is! (March 30)15:09
LocutusOfBorgtjaalton, hello, libepoxy dlopens :#define GLES2_LIB "libGLESv2.so.2" and doesn't runtime depend on it15:09
arraybolt3Eickmeyer: Oh, I read "monday before beta release" as meaning that the beta release was going to be the monday *after* that :facepalm: ok so I can't read15:10
LocutusOfBorglibgles-dev was pulled in by webkit2gtk, but its not anymore15:10
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1033230 in src:webkit2gtk "webkit2gtk: version 2.39.90-1 lost its libgles2 runtime dependency" [Serious, Open]15:10
LocutusOfBorgand I don't think webkit2gtk is the package to blame here... (but I think webkit2gtk has also a bug)15:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]15:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]15:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]15:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]15:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]15:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]15:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [i386] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]15:23
tewardcan the release / SRU teams take a look at my request I emailed to devel-discuss and release lists for a one time MRE exception to allow torbrowser-launcher to be uploaded to -updates to all supported releases currently (non-ESM I mean)15:26
teward(it's already in Lunar now()15:26
renanrodrigoarraybolt3: Eickmeyer: well, so it seems we have one more week to make sure all is in. Should I ping someone specific to approve the FFE?15:35
Eickmeyerrenanrodrigo: this entire channel (ubuntu-release) should do the trick. Anyone on the release team, specifically. I'm not one of them, but I wanted to get your u-a-t FFe looked at.15:36
Eickmeyerrenanrodrigo: Can you post the bug number in here of the FFe?15:37
renanrodrigodid a while ago, doing again: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/201175715:37
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2011757 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.14" [Undecided, New]15:37
Eickmeyerubuntu-release: I'm kindof trying to usher this one along, u-a-t FFe needs to be approved, they want to upload. This upload should unbreak update-manager.15:38
Eickmeyerrenanrodrigo: I did discuss this with vorlon on Saturday. It shouldn't block an SRU in later releases.15:40
vorlonFFe granted, but someone should explain what is broken about update-manager15:43
vorlonbecause having the thing that handles updates on your system be broken is critical, so if this affects anything other than lunar, we should know details15:44
Eickmeyervorlon: Finding the bug report now. Basically, it fails to function.15:44
Eickmeyervorlon: bug 200828015:45
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2008280 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "regression: update-manager 1:23.04.1 no longer installs any updates (lunar)" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200828015:45
Eickmeyerafaik, it doesn't hurt anything but lunar.15:46
vorlonupdate-manager should be proofed against failures in the ubuntu-advantage-tools pro integration15:47
vorlonthat shouldn't require an FFe of u-a-t to fix15:47
Eickmeyer100% agreed. This should've been hotfixed.15:48
vorlondepending on the user's configuration, update-manager is the only way the system gets updates, including security updates.  It needs to be bulletproof.15:48
vorlonah but reading on I see the issue is that invoking u-a-t is breaking the global apt config15:49
vorlonso yeah, difficult to work around that in update-manager15:49
renanrodrigovorlon: when we saw this bug, the fix was already ongoing in the u-a-t side15:50
renanrodrigoand the code their side is doing the right thing15:51
vorlonarchive-team.internal name, which is hardcoded in livecd-rootfs, has been redirected from snakefruit to the new internal web frontend.  Doing a smoketest build of Ubuntu Desktop amd64 to validate15:52
vorlonrenanrodrigo: yeah, agreed after reading farther15:52
renanrodrigovorlon: thanks. Feel free to reach out in case of any other question. And thanks also for the grant.15:53
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: is there a reason why llvm-toolchain doesn't build libomp on s390x?15:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (kinetic-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu1.22.10.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.22.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)16:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (jammy-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu1.22.04.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.22.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)16:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (focal-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)16:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (bionic-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)16:09
tillkamppeter@vorlon thanks a lot for all your help last Friday, today, finding the update-excuses healthy again, all foo2zjs test failures are gone!! Now cups-filters is only waiting for the libraries getting promoted into Main ...17:47
vorlontillkamppeter: indeed!  I look forward to that happening as that will clear out https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/nbs.html for the cycle :)17:49
bdmurrayvorlon: What is going on with crudini? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crudini/+publishinghistory18:22
bdmurrayah it finally migrated18:47
vorlonbdmurray: what was it you were seeing of concern?  as of 10:07 PT it had been waiting for an s390x test result19:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (focal-proposed/main) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.14 => 0.8.3-1ubuntu12.15] (core, kernel-dkms)19:58
bdmurrayvorlon: I was looking at update_excuses for packages with a test in progress that wasn't really in progress and crudini met that criteria20:05
bdmurrayAlthough I guess it did pass20:06
vorlonbdmurray: ah right so it was the race with the results page being regenerated20:07
bdmurrayit was fairly old so somebody likely requeued it20:11
falcojrsil2100: cloud-init has an SRU for B, F, J, and K per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2008230 . If there is time today to review that SRU, testing is complete20:44
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2008230 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (23.1 update) Bionic, Focal, Jammy, Kinetic" [Undecided, New]20:44

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!