| === chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 06:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [i386] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 06:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [armhf] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 06:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [arm64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 06:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 06:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 06:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [s390x] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 10:08 | |
| georgiag | ubuntu-sru: is the soft freeze of focal still in place? I was hoping we could get the SRU for bug 1994146 released | 11:39 |
|---|---|---|
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1994146 in apparmor (Ubuntu) "[SRU] apparmor - Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1994146 | 11:39 | |
| ItzSwirlz | hi release people, a few cinnamon 5.6x point releases have been made with bug fixes. However, it is not just cinnamon that could use a requestsync, but a couple other packages, maybe about 3-5 total. Is that okay at this point close to beta? | 11:44 |
| * ItzSwirlz wonders why i said "release people" and not "release team" | 11:44 | |
| ItzSwirlz | I got class, so if anyone responds i'll check irclogs o/ | 11:49 |
| tsimonq2 | Depends on what the "couple other packages" are ;) | 11:56 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, hey, did you have any luck with webkigtk? did you report the issue upstream? | 12:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, not yet, I don't really understand what is going on, and why only on armhf | 12:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | somewhere I think we can add the dependency on surf on mesa and live happy for now | 12:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but I don't want to hide a real issue | 12:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I just finished phpldapadmin NMU work and upload, will come back to this soon I hope | 12:15 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, thanks | 12:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, debian uploaded 2.40 in debian, with same issue | 12:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'll open an RC bug to them and let them work on it? | 12:22 |
| seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, ideally we would also report it upstream | 12:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seb128, I still don't understand if it is an upstream issue or not... | 12:30 |
| seb128 | it takes 3 days for that package to build on riscv, so we can't just sit and wait for too long or we will not have it fixed for beta | 12:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and to which component (ANGLE? core?) | 12:30 |
| seb128 | well let's start by Debian then... | 12:30 |
| seb128 | do they also have failing autopkgtests? | 12:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes! | 12:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | same issue | 12:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I openen an RC and will ask on irc | 12:30 |
| seb128 | thanks | 12:31 |
| seb128 | on which channel? just curious so I can keep an eye on the discussion | 12:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | #-devel | 12:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | for now | 12:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | in any case I would like to upload 2.40.0-2 to Ubuntu | 12:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnu-efi (kinetic-proposed/main) [3.0.13+git20210716.269ef9d-2ubuntu1 => 3.0.15-1~22.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 12:36 | |
| Ukikie | (Debian #1033230) | 12:36 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1033230 in src:webkit2gtk "webkit2gtk: version 2.39.90-1 lost its libgles2 runtime dependency" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1033230 | 12:37 | |
| renanrodrigo | Hello, everyone; we have a new version of ubuntu-advantage-tools coming in, and this time it is concurrent with the lunar freezes (afaik the beta freeze starts today) We have a FFE open (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2011757). a) is this FFE enough to get it through? b) Could someone please approve it :D ? | 14:59 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2011757 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.14" [Undecided, New] | 14:59 | |
| arraybolt3 | renanrodrigo: Beta Freeze isn't for several more days. | 15:03 |
| arraybolt3 | See https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lunar-lobster-release-schedule/27284 | 15:03 |
| arraybolt3 | Starts March 27, today is March 20. | 15:03 |
| renanrodrigo | perfect - we will upload before that for sure | 15:04 |
| renanrodrigo | s/upload/make best effort to upload/ | 15:04 |
| coreycb | hello sru team, we have some openstack packages that could use some attention: aodh in jammy unapproved, neutron in focal (verified), and heat in kinetic/jammy (verified) | 15:05 |
| Eickmeyer | arraybolt3: Beta freeze is always the monday before beta release. | 15:08 |
| Eickmeyer | So, one week from today. :) | 15:08 |
| Eickmeyer | (You are correct, sir!) | 15:09 |
| arraybolt3 | Eickmeyer: Funny thing, Beta Freeze is documented in the release schedule, but Beta Release isn't :P | 15:09 |
| Eickmeyer | arraybolt3: It sure is! (March 30) | 15:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, hello, libepoxy dlopens :#define GLES2_LIB "libGLESv2.so.2" and doesn't runtime depend on it | 15:09 |
| arraybolt3 | Eickmeyer: Oh, I read "monday before beta release" as meaning that the beta release was going to be the monday *after* that :facepalm: ok so I can't read | 15:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | libgles-dev was pulled in by webkit2gtk, but its not anymore | 15:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033230 | 15:10 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1033230 in src:webkit2gtk "webkit2gtk: version 2.39.90-1 lost its libgles2 runtime dependency" [Serious, Open] | 15:10 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | and I don't think webkit2gtk is the package to blame here... (but I think webkit2gtk has also a bug) | 15:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] | 15:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] | 15:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] | 15:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] | 15:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] | 15:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] | 15:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [i386] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] | 15:23 | |
| teward | can the release / SRU teams take a look at my request I emailed to devel-discuss and release lists for a one time MRE exception to allow torbrowser-launcher to be uploaded to -updates to all supported releases currently (non-ESM I mean) | 15:26 |
| teward | (it's already in Lunar now() | 15:26 |
| renanrodrigo | arraybolt3: Eickmeyer: well, so it seems we have one more week to make sure all is in. Should I ping someone specific to approve the FFE? | 15:35 |
| Eickmeyer | renanrodrigo: this entire channel (ubuntu-release) should do the trick. Anyone on the release team, specifically. I'm not one of them, but I wanted to get your u-a-t FFe looked at. | 15:36 |
| Eickmeyer | renanrodrigo: Can you post the bug number in here of the FFe? | 15:37 |
| renanrodrigo | did a while ago, doing again: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2011757 | 15:37 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2011757 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.14" [Undecided, New] | 15:37 | |
| Eickmeyer | ubuntu-release: I'm kindof trying to usher this one along, u-a-t FFe needs to be approved, they want to upload. This upload should unbreak update-manager. | 15:38 |
| Eickmeyer | renanrodrigo: I did discuss this with vorlon on Saturday. It shouldn't block an SRU in later releases. | 15:40 |
| Eickmeyer | s/later/earlier | 15:43 |
| vorlon | FFe granted, but someone should explain what is broken about update-manager | 15:43 |
| vorlon | because having the thing that handles updates on your system be broken is critical, so if this affects anything other than lunar, we should know details | 15:44 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: Finding the bug report now. Basically, it fails to function. | 15:44 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: bug 2008280 | 15:45 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2008280 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "regression: update-manager 1:23.04.1 no longer installs any updates (lunar)" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2008280 | 15:45 | |
| Eickmeyer | afaik, it doesn't hurt anything but lunar. | 15:46 |
| vorlon | update-manager should be proofed against failures in the ubuntu-advantage-tools pro integration | 15:47 |
| vorlon | that shouldn't require an FFe of u-a-t to fix | 15:47 |
| Eickmeyer | 100% agreed. This should've been hotfixed. | 15:48 |
| vorlon | depending on the user's configuration, update-manager is the only way the system gets updates, including security updates. It needs to be bulletproof. | 15:48 |
| vorlon | ah but reading on I see the issue is that invoking u-a-t is breaking the global apt config | 15:49 |
| vorlon | so yeah, difficult to work around that in update-manager | 15:49 |
| renanrodrigo | vorlon: when we saw this bug, the fix was already ongoing in the u-a-t side | 15:50 |
| renanrodrigo | and the code their side is doing the right thing | 15:51 |
| vorlon | archive-team.internal name, which is hardcoded in livecd-rootfs, has been redirected from snakefruit to the new internal web frontend. Doing a smoketest build of Ubuntu Desktop amd64 to validate | 15:52 |
| vorlon | renanrodrigo: yeah, agreed after reading farther | 15:52 |
| renanrodrigo | vorlon: thanks. Feel free to reach out in case of any other question. And thanks also for the grant. | 15:53 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: is there a reason why llvm-toolchain doesn't build libomp on s390x? | 15:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (kinetic-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu1.22.10.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.22.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 16:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (jammy-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu1.22.04.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.22.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 16:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (focal-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 16:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (bionic-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 16:09 | |
| tillkamppeter | @vorlon thanks a lot for all your help last Friday, today, finding the update-excuses healthy again, all foo2zjs test failures are gone!! Now cups-filters is only waiting for the libraries getting promoted into Main ... | 17:47 |
| vorlon | tillkamppeter: indeed! I look forward to that happening as that will clear out https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/nbs.html for the cycle :) | 17:49 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: What is going on with crudini? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crudini/+publishinghistory | 18:22 |
| bdmurray | ah it finally migrated | 18:47 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: what was it you were seeing of concern? as of 10:07 PT it had been waiting for an s390x test result | 19:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (focal-proposed/main) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.14 => 0.8.3-1ubuntu12.15] (core, kernel-dkms) | 19:58 | |
| bdmurray | vorlon: I was looking at update_excuses for packages with a test in progress that wasn't really in progress and crudini met that criteria | 20:05 |
| bdmurray | Although I guess it did pass | 20:06 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: ah right so it was the race with the results page being regenerated | 20:07 |
| bdmurray | it was fairly old so somebody likely requeued it | 20:11 |
| falcojr | sil2100: cloud-init has an SRU for B, F, J, and K per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2008230 . If there is time today to review that SRU, testing is complete | 20:44 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2008230 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (23.1 update) Bionic, Focal, Jammy, Kinetic" [Undecided, New] | 20:44 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!