[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [amd64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [i386] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [armhf] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [arm64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[06:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [riscv64] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libevent [s390x] (lunar-proposed/main) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:39] <georgiag> ubuntu-sru: is the soft freeze of focal still in place? I was hoping we could get the SRU for bug 1994146 released
[11:39] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1994146 in apparmor (Ubuntu) "[SRU] apparmor - Focal, Jammy" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1994146
[11:44] <ItzSwirlz> hi release people, a few cinnamon 5.6x point releases have been made with bug fixes. However, it is not just cinnamon that could use a requestsync, but a couple other packages, maybe about 3-5 total. Is that okay at this point close to beta?
[11:44]  * ItzSwirlz wonders why i said "release people" and not "release team"
[11:49] <ItzSwirlz> I got class, so if anyone responds i'll check irclogs o/
[11:56] <tsimonq2> Depends on what the "couple other packages" are ;)
[12:12] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, hey, did you have any luck with webkigtk? did you report the issue upstream?
[12:14] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, not yet, I don't really understand what is going on, and why only on armhf
[12:14] <LocutusOfBorg> somewhere I think we can add the dependency on surf on mesa and live happy for now
[12:14] <LocutusOfBorg> but I don't want to hide a real issue
[12:15] <LocutusOfBorg> I just finished phpldapadmin NMU work and upload, will come back to this soon I hope
[12:15] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, thanks
[12:22] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, debian uploaded 2.40 in debian, with same issue
[12:22] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll open an RC bug to them and let them work on it?
[12:29] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, ideally we would also report it upstream
[12:30] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, I still don't understand if it is an upstream issue or not...
[12:30] <seb128> it takes 3 days for that package to build on riscv, so we can't just sit and wait for too long or we will not have it fixed for beta
[12:30] <LocutusOfBorg> and to which component (ANGLE? core?)
[12:30] <seb128> well let's start by Debian then...
[12:30] <seb128> do they also have failing autopkgtests?
[12:30] <LocutusOfBorg> yes!
[12:30] <LocutusOfBorg> same issue
[12:30] <LocutusOfBorg> I openen an RC and will ask on irc
[12:31] <seb128> thanks
[12:31] <seb128> on which channel? just curious so I can keep an eye on the discussion
[12:33] <LocutusOfBorg> #-devel
[12:33] <LocutusOfBorg> for now
[12:33] <LocutusOfBorg> in any case I would like to upload 2.40.0-2 to Ubuntu
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnu-efi (kinetic-proposed/main) [3.0.13+git20210716.269ef9d-2ubuntu1 => 3.0.15-1~22.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[12:36] <Ukikie> (Debian #1033230)
[12:37] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1033230 in src:webkit2gtk "webkit2gtk: version 2.39.90-1 lost its libgles2 runtime dependency" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1033230
[14:59] <renanrodrigo> Hello, everyone; we have a new version of ubuntu-advantage-tools coming in, and this time it is concurrent with the lunar freezes (afaik the beta freeze starts today) We have a FFE open (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2011757). a) is this FFE enough to get it through? b) Could someone please approve it :D  ?
[14:59] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2011757 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.14" [Undecided, New]
[15:03] <arraybolt3> renanrodrigo: Beta Freeze isn't for several more days.
[15:03] <arraybolt3> See https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/lunar-lobster-release-schedule/27284
[15:03] <arraybolt3> Starts March 27, today is March 20.
[15:04] <renanrodrigo> perfect - we will upload before that for sure
[15:04] <renanrodrigo> s/upload/make best effort to upload/
[15:05] <coreycb> hello sru team, we have some openstack packages that could use some attention: aodh in jammy unapproved, neutron in focal (verified), and heat in kinetic/jammy (verified)
[15:08] <Eickmeyer> arraybolt3: Beta freeze is always the monday before beta release.
[15:08] <Eickmeyer> So, one week from today. :)
[15:09] <Eickmeyer> (You are correct, sir!)
[15:09] <arraybolt3> Eickmeyer: Funny thing, Beta Freeze is documented in the release schedule, but Beta Release isn't :P
[15:09] <Eickmeyer> arraybolt3: It sure is! (March 30)
[15:09] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, hello, libepoxy dlopens :#define GLES2_LIB "libGLESv2.so.2" and doesn't runtime depend on it
[15:10] <arraybolt3> Eickmeyer: Oh, I read "monday before beta release" as meaning that the beta release was going to be the monday *after* that :facepalm: ok so I can't read
[15:10] <LocutusOfBorg> libgles-dev was pulled in by webkit2gtk, but its not anymore
[15:10] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033230
[15:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1033230 in src:webkit2gtk "webkit2gtk: version 2.39.90-1 lost its libgles2 runtime dependency" [Serious, Open]
[15:10] <LocutusOfBorg> and I don't think webkit2gtk is the package to blame here... (but I think webkit2gtk has also a bug)
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [armhf] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [ppc64el] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [s390x] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [arm64] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [riscv64] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libevent [i386] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.12-stable-8ubuntu2]
[15:26] <teward> can the release / SRU teams take a look at my request I emailed to devel-discuss and release lists for a one time MRE exception to allow torbrowser-launcher to be uploaded to -updates to all supported releases currently (non-ESM I mean)
[15:26] <teward> (it's already in Lunar now()
[15:35] <renanrodrigo> arraybolt3: Eickmeyer: well, so it seems we have one more week to make sure all is in. Should I ping someone specific to approve the FFE?
[15:36] <Eickmeyer> renanrodrigo: this entire channel (ubuntu-release) should do the trick. Anyone on the release team, specifically. I'm not one of them, but I wanted to get your u-a-t FFe looked at.
[15:37] <Eickmeyer> renanrodrigo: Can you post the bug number in here of the FFe?
[15:37] <renanrodrigo> did a while ago, doing again: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2011757
[15:37] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2011757 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.14" [Undecided, New]
[15:38] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-release: I'm kindof trying to usher this one along, u-a-t FFe needs to be approved, they want to upload. This upload should unbreak update-manager.
[15:40] <Eickmeyer> renanrodrigo: I did discuss this with vorlon on Saturday. It shouldn't block an SRU in later releases.
[15:43] <Eickmeyer> s/later/earlier
[15:43] <vorlon> FFe granted, but someone should explain what is broken about update-manager
[15:44] <vorlon> because having the thing that handles updates on your system be broken is critical, so if this affects anything other than lunar, we should know details
[15:44] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Finding the bug report now. Basically, it fails to function.
[15:45] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: bug 2008280
[15:45] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2008280 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "regression: update-manager 1:23.04.1 no longer installs any updates (lunar)" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2008280
[15:46] <Eickmeyer> afaik, it doesn't hurt anything but lunar.
[15:47] <vorlon> update-manager should be proofed against failures in the ubuntu-advantage-tools pro integration
[15:47] <vorlon> that shouldn't require an FFe of u-a-t to fix
[15:48] <Eickmeyer> 100% agreed. This should've been hotfixed.
[15:48] <vorlon> depending on the user's configuration, update-manager is the only way the system gets updates, including security updates.  It needs to be bulletproof.
[15:49] <vorlon> ah but reading on I see the issue is that invoking u-a-t is breaking the global apt config
[15:49] <vorlon> so yeah, difficult to work around that in update-manager
[15:50] <renanrodrigo> vorlon: when we saw this bug, the fix was already ongoing in the u-a-t side
[15:51] <renanrodrigo> and the code their side is doing the right thing
[15:52] <vorlon> archive-team.internal name, which is hardcoded in livecd-rootfs, has been redirected from snakefruit to the new internal web frontend.  Doing a smoketest build of Ubuntu Desktop amd64 to validate
[15:52] <vorlon> renanrodrigo: yeah, agreed after reading farther
[15:53] <renanrodrigo> vorlon: thanks. Feel free to reach out in case of any other question. And thanks also for the grant.
[15:55] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: is there a reason why llvm-toolchain doesn't build libomp on s390x?
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (kinetic-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu1.22.10.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.22.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (jammy-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu1.22.04.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.22.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (focal-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.20.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (bionic-proposed/main) [4.4-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 4.5-1ubuntu0.18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[17:47] <tillkamppeter> @vorlon thanks a lot for all your help last Friday, today, finding the update-excuses healthy again, all foo2zjs test failures are gone!! Now cups-filters is only waiting for the libraries getting promoted into Main ...
[17:49] <vorlon> tillkamppeter: indeed!  I look forward to that happening as that will clear out https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/nbs.html for the cycle :)
[18:22] <bdmurray> vorlon: What is going on with crudini? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crudini/+publishinghistory
[18:47] <bdmurray> ah it finally migrated
[19:41] <vorlon> bdmurray: what was it you were seeing of concern?  as of 10:07 PT it had been waiting for an s390x test result
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (focal-proposed/main) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.14 => 0.8.3-1ubuntu12.15] (core, kernel-dkms)
[20:05] <bdmurray> vorlon: I was looking at update_excuses for packages with a test in progress that wasn't really in progress and crudini met that criteria
[20:06] <bdmurray> Although I guess it did pass
[20:07] <vorlon> bdmurray: ah right so it was the race with the results page being regenerated
[20:11] <bdmurray> it was fairly old so somebody likely requeued it
[20:44] <falcojr> sil2100: cloud-init has an SRU for B, F, J, and K per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2008230 . If there is time today to review that SRU, testing is complete
[20:44] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2008230 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (23.1 update) Bionic, Focal, Jammy, Kinetic" [Undecided, New]