| mwhudson | You submitted an invalid request: python-flake8/5.0.4-4 is not published in PPA danilogondolfo/icdiff lunar | 00:14 |
|---|---|---|
| mwhudson | annoyingly | 00:14 |
| danilogondolfo | what... wait, I have proposed enabled in the PPA dependencies... how do you trigger a PPA test with something from proposed? | 00:18 |
| mwhudson | danilogondolfo: i think you need to copy the thing from propsoed (and then wait for it to publish :/) | 00:36 |
| === TheMaster is now known as Unit193 | ||
| arraybolt3 | Can I get someone to sponsor an upload to Openbox for me real quick? It's a critical bugfix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openbox/+bug/2011751 that I would really like to get in before Beta Freeze if at all possible. The debdiff is attached to the bug report. | 02:58 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2011751 in openbox (Ubuntu) "openbox crashed with SIGABRT" [Critical, Confirmed] | 02:58 | |
| arraybolt3 | tsimonq2, teward: ^ | 02:59 |
| arraybolt3 | (in case anyone's wondering, yes, I am about to write to devel-permissions to ask for that to be added to the Lubuntu packageset.) | 02:59 |
| dbungert | arraybolt3: looking | 03:00 |
| arraybolt3 | Thanks! | 03:02 |
| arraybolt3 | (btw the code added in that patch has been tested by one of Lubuntu's testers for a couple of days and it resolves the bug for him.) | 03:05 |
| arraybolt3 | dbungert: Saw your comment, and followed up with some extra rationale and some testing. | 04:13 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: sergiodj's (excellent) dep8 test for mosh goes out of its way to run the upstream test suite against the installed system binaries. But is that overkill? I thought the request was to hack the autopkgtest rdep trigger to rebuild and rerun mosh's upstream test suite but against its own built binaries instead? | 12:35 |
| rbasak | The only catch doing it this way is that it's a bit fragile to upstream testsuite changes. | 12:35 |
| rbasak | So I'm wondering if it's worth it, in case it wasn't actually the MIR team's request. | 12:36 |
| cpaelzer | we usually want to test what is in the package | 12:59 |
| cpaelzer | I mean you know the argument best from the SRU POV | 13:00 |
| cpaelzer | you do not want the thing in the PPA to be tested, the actual build that lands | 13:00 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: ^^ | 13:00 |
| bluca | could you submit those changes as a MR on salsa too please? I'd like to reduce the delta between debian and ubuntu | 13:01 |
| bluca | sorry that was for hallyn ^ | 13:01 |
| bluca | reg. the libsystemd static stuff | 13:02 |
| rbasak | Well, OK. For mosh, it seems required to rebuild the source tree to get the test suite (or else we'd need a separate mosh test suite binary package or something). | 13:06 |
| rbasak | And at that point, it feels like a hack to use autopkgtest for this, rather than just requiring rdep build testing before proposed migration for some packages. | 13:06 |
| rbasak | But fine :) | 13:06 |
| === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie | ||
| enr0n | bluca: hallyn: I was planning to do so | 13:39 |
| hallyn | bluca: enr0n: oh, great, thanks | 13:40 |
| bluca | great, thanks | 13:42 |
| ahasenack | in ubuntu-hints, what's the difference between force-badtest and force-skiptest again? | 16:08 |
| tumbleweed | force-badtest means assume the previous test for a given package had failed (so failing again isn't a regression) | 16:12 |
| tumbleweed | force-skiptest says don't wait for the reverse-deps of a package to pass autopkgtests | 16:12 |
| teward | ddstreet: NACK on memtest86+ backport of 6.10-2 - see my note on the bug and why i'd like it to be updated to -4 instead of -2 for backporting | 18:58 |
| teward | (updates in -3 and -4 to match EFI spec) | 18:59 |
| teward | mapreri: ^^ (see #1998834 for reference) | 19:01 |
| danilogondolfo | anybody available to review and sponsor (or not) a workaround for icdiff autopkgtest? https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/ubuntu/+source/icdiff/+git/icdiff/+merge/439410 | 19:22 |
| danilogondolfo | ahasenack_, ^ I commented out that test for now, will try to submit a fix upstream | 19:23 |
| ahasenack_ | danilogondolfo: ah, cool. Any idea what the fix will be yet? :) | 19:23 |
| danilogondolfo | not rely on the file descriptor number I guess hehe | 19:24 |
| danilogondolfo | ahasenack_, that was the first workaround https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/ubuntu/+source/icdiff/+git/icdiff/+merge/439360 | 19:25 |
| ahasenack_ | did you run that in an autopkgtest env? | 19:25 |
| ahasenack_ | I'm wondering if you are closing fds that are needed by the infra | 19:26 |
| danilogondolfo | no, I didn't. It requires python-flake8 from proposed and apparently I'd need to create a PPA of it to run the test, and I ended up not doing that. | 19:27 |
| danilogondolfo | I think it's safer to just disable that particular test | 19:29 |
| sergiodj | danilogondolfo: sorry for jumping into the conversation, but can you reproduce the problem locally? I forgot | 19:29 |
| danilogondolfo | sergiodj, yes, the test never works on autopkgtest | 19:29 |
| sergiodj | danilogondolfo: gotcha. so since we're talking about workarounds, another one is to adjust the expected fds if running inside autopkgtest | 19:29 |
| sergiodj | of course, this is ugly and all, but I think it's safer than closing unknown fds | 19:30 |
| danilogondolfo | so, it will try to match the fd it gets from <(cat somefile.txt) with the content of another file that has the /dev/fd/63 hardcoded | 19:31 |
| sergiodj | ugh, what an ugly way to test things :-/ | 19:33 |
| danilogondolfo | yeah... | 19:33 |
| danilogondolfo | my idea was to just disable it for now and work with upstream to find a better solution and also incorporate another patch present in the package | 19:33 |
| sergiodj | I think it's better to skip the test for now, indeed | 19:34 |
| mwhudson | hooray for a less broken linux-libc-dev | 20:14 |
| ddstreet | ricotz lp: #2009944 LGTM, feel free to ping me once the backport-from version moves from kinetic-proposed to kinetic-updates and i'll approve the backports | 20:31 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2009944 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) "[BPO] libreoffice 7.4.6 for bionic, focal and jammy" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2009944 | 20:31 | |
| ricotz | ddstreet, thx, ack (jfyi https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/libr/libreoffice/libreoffice_7.4.5-2_changelog) | 20:46 |
| ddstreet | hmm so, ubuntu is ahead of debian for libreoffce? | 20:48 |
| ddstreet | well, i guess we are ahead of unstable | 20:48 |
| ddstreet | i mean, hey if you get it into kinetic-updates, that's good enough for me ;-) | 20:49 |
| teward | ddstreet: i wasn't sure if you saw my NACK note here, but we have a way forward for memtest86+ for backports - when -4 is available Just Do It for the upload + approve for -backports pocket | 20:58 |
| teward | *goes back to poking things in -proposed* | 20:59 |
| ddstreet | teward yep! thanks :) | 20:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!