| === chris14_ is now known as chris14 | ||
| RAOF | What's the status of the 20.04.6 point release? Specifically: is focal-updates open to release things into yet? | 04:36 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | Last update I can see is “it's OK to wait and release on Monday (ie: two days ago)”. | 04:37 |
| amurray | fwiw the security team already assumed that focal-security (and hence -updates) was open to release into and so we have been publishing back into it since late last week | 04:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lomiri [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset) | 04:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-paras-35-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in bionic | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-paras-35-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-paras-35-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (focal-proposed/main) [1.187.37 => 1.187.38] (core, kernel) | 09:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (focal-proposed) [1.187.38] | 09:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (kinetic-proposed) [20220923.gitf09bebf3-0ubuntu1.5] | 09:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (kinetic-proposed/main) [43.0-1ubuntu1 => 43.0-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 10:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (jammy-proposed/main) [42.1-1ubuntu2.1 => 42.1-1ubuntu2.2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 10:10 | |
| ebarretto | rbasak, hey! I see you are on SRU duty today, could you please check the openscap SRU and let me know if anything else is needed from my side? Thanks :) | 10:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.6] has been marked as ready | 11:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.6] has been marked as ready | 11:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Focal 20.04.6] has been marked as ready | 11:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.6] has been marked as ready | 11:52 | |
| adrien | I'm finally following up on two stuff I notice during my +1 shift but wasn't sure how to do then: remove crystal and bettercap-caplets | 13:08 |
| adrien | bettercap-caplets depends on bettercap-ui which is not packaged (electron app); track.debian.org also reports bettercap-caplets as uninstallable because of that; I have not seen work towards packaging bettercap-ui | 13:09 |
| adrien | crystal build-depends on itself and apparently its tests require internet access; I think it can be blacklisted because noone is doing the extra work needed to (maybe?) make it available in ubuntu | 13:13 |
| adrien | see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crystal/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=NEW (there are reports from 2020) | 13:13 |
| rbasak | ebarretto: openscap isn't showing as green on https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/pending-sru.html | 14:15 |
| rbasak | ebarretto: it's expected that you specify in a bug comment exactly what versions you tested (by version string, not just by stating "all"), and what the results were, per series. | 14:16 |
| rbasak | Once done, please flip the verification tags. | 14:16 |
| rbasak | Please also specify in that comment exactly what tests you ran. Just referencing the agreed Test Plan is fine. | 14:17 |
| rbasak | Because sometimes people just say "yeah I tested it", we get regressions, and then it turns out that they didn't test some version or what the Test Plan said. | 14:18 |
| ebarretto | rbasak, why is it showing green for 2004476 ? | 14:19 |
| rbasak | ebarretto: presumably becaues that has the tags flipped already? | 14:21 |
| ebarretto | rbasak, only for bionic, shouldn't it need all? | 14:22 |
| rbasak | ebarretto: the report has different sections for the different series (which I find inverted, but there we are) | 14:23 |
| ebarretto | oh right | 14:24 |
| rbasak | We can release one series at a time. But that means that users might face a regression when upgrading to a newer series, depending on the ordering. It's easier to do them all at once :) | 14:24 |
| ebarretto | indeed, thanks! I will be adding the missing bits | 14:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lomiri [amd64] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.2-1] | 15:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (jammy-proposed/main) [2:20.2.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:20.3.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 15:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-somerville-paras-35-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 16:12 | |
| Trevinho | arraybolt3: that slice allocator is considered deprecated for years, if nobody tests earlier using G_SLICE=always-malloc the code, then... I assume there have been memory bugs for years. | 16:23 |
| utkarsh2102 | vorlon: ohai! do you happen to know how frequently does germinate run on u-a-t? | 17:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gallery-dl [source] (kinetic-backports) [1.25.0-1~bpo22.10.1] | 18:00 | |
| ahasenack_ | hi release team, please consider this hint update for samba dep8 tests on ppc64el: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/439411 | 18:05 |
| ahasenack_ | bdmurray: paride told me you are somewhat aware of performance issues on ppc64el dep8 vms? Perhaps storage? | 18:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.25.0-1~bpo22.04.1] | 18:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yt-dlp [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.03.04-1~bpo22.04.1] | 18:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted limnoria [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.1.28-1~bpo22.04.1] | 18:15 | |
| bdmurray | ahasenack_: If by somewhat aware you mean have heard of yes | 18:15 |
| ahasenack_ | yes | 18:16 |
| ahasenack_ | I filed that PR above for a badtest hint, samba is failing consistently on ppc64el because the test can't succeed in launching a lunar container, it fails with a timeout | 18:16 |
| ahasenack_ | bdmurray: are you in the release team? I forget | 18:17 |
| * bdmurray is hurt | 18:18 | |
| ahasenack_ | yes, you are, I checked, and won't forget again :) | 18:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (focal-backports) [1.25.0-1~bpo20.04.1] | 18:23 | |
| mwhudson | utkarsh2102: i think it's part of the cronjob that runs britney | 20:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected memtest86+ [source] (jammy-backports) [6.10-2~bpo22.04.1] | 21:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (kinetic-proposed/main) [27.13.6~22.10.1 => 27.14~22.10.1] (core) | 21:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (focal-proposed/main) [27.13.6~20.04.1 => 27.14~20.04.1] (core) | 21:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (jammy-proposed/main) [27.13.6~22.04.1 => 27.14~22.04.1] (core) | 21:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [27.13.6~18.04.1 => 27.14~18.04.1] (core) | 21:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [27.13.6~16.04.1 => 27.14~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib2.0 (jammy-proposed/main) [2.72.4-0ubuntu1 => 2.72.4-0ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 22:16 | |
| bluesabre | sil2100, vorlon: What needs to be updated so that iso.qa shows the correct download URLs for xubuntu-minimal? http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/441/builds/274599/downloads | 23:04 |
| bdmurray | ahasenack brought up an autopkgtest that had only 3 lines of logs for an extended period of time. This can happen because am64 instances can be slow to provision and the test is just waiting to time out. | 23:25 |
| sarnold | heh is that 'arm64' or 'amd64'? they're both one typo away :) | 23:37 |
| bdmurray | amd64 | 23:47 |
| sarnold | I guessed wrong! | 23:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!