[02:08] <Psil0[m]12> Hey
[06:36] <zhsj> hi, could someone `./retry-autopkgtest-regressions --blocks golang-golang-x-tools` ? it looks like the usual flaky in vim-youcompleteme and ycmd packages.
[06:38] <ginggs> zhsj: looking...
[06:40] <ginggs> zhsj: .
[14:06] <holmanb> rbasak: I was out Friday, responding now
[14:08] <holmanb> rbasak: There aren't any bugs related to this change, and I don't know of any historical bugs that led to this decision either - my assumption is that this is a risk mitigation and not high urgency.
[14:08] <holmanb> going to debian first with this change seems reasonable to me
[14:44] <xnox> rbasak:  vorlon: le sigh w.r.t. distro-info-data => will write an email.
[15:10] <rbasak> holmanb: sure. Let me know if you need anything!
[19:04] <vorlon> tjaalton: if lib*noop_drm_shim.so have no soname, why are they shipped in /usr/lib/$arch instead of somewhere else?  How are these binaries actually consumed?
[19:05] <vorlon> tjaalton: (lintian reports multiple errors and warnings because of this)
[20:33] <tjaalton> vorlon: that's a fair point, it should probably be under a subdir though libdir is where meson puts it. the consumer is either a tester or a CI system that would use an LD_PRELOAD to tell where the shim is
[20:36] <vorlon> tjaalton: would it be too much trouble for you to move it?
[20:40] <tjaalton> vorlon: nope, but do you want it before accepting the new binary? :)
[20:40] <vorlon> tjaalton: as long as you're committed to fixing it, I'll accept
[20:41] <tjaalton> sure, there's a new point-release next week, so at least that upload will have it