[00:09] <jbicha> Trevinho: should we have gnome-control-center depend on libgtk-4-media-gstreamer for 23.04 then?
[00:09] <Trevinho> jbicha: that's fine
[00:10] <vorlon> jbicha: because it's a functional dependency or because you're trying to force picking it up on beta-installed systems that miss it?
[00:12] <jbicha> I believe it's required to fix bug 2011849
[00:12] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2011849 in gtk4 (Ubuntu) "gnome-control-center 44rc is missing graphics for Multitasking and Mouse & Touchpad" [Critical, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2011849
[00:13] <vorlon> then that sounds fair.
[00:14] <vorlon> if Recommends: is more correct for you, then adding it as a new Recommends post-beta would also cause it to be pulled in for users on upgrade
[00:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (lunar-proposed/main) [1:44.0-1ubuntu3 => 1:44.0-1ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[00:25] <jbicha> I added a todo task to investigate the gnome-remote-desktop SRU
[01:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntukylin-meta (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.48 => 0.49] (ubuntukylin)
[02:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-meta (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.292 => 0.293] (ubuntustudio)
[02:15] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: ^^ looks like there were some seed changes for ubuntustudio that hadn't gotten uploaded
[02:16] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Weird...
[02:16] <vorlon> doesn't inhibit the beta, unless you think the missing recommend means your testing is invalid and needs a respin
[02:16] <Eickmeyer> looking...
[02:16] <vorlon> (post-beta, the added recommends will get pulled in on upgrade)
[02:20] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: I see the changes. Now I'm thinking.
[02:20] <Eickmeyer> (forgot about those preseeds, was to mitigate pulseaudio being pulled-in)
[02:21] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Nah, I think post-beta is fine. No respin necessary.
[02:21] <vorlon> ack
[03:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (lunar-proposed/universe) [23.04.24 => 23.04.25] (ubuntustudio)
[03:40] <Eickmeyer> ^ Can wait until after beta.
[03:59] <arraybolt3> Doing a live session beta test of Ubuntu MATE, and while I've found a few minor bugs, this one seems particularly bad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/caja/+bug/2013138 Not sure it's a beta blocker, but is there anything upstream that might fix this before the release?
[03:59] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2013138 in caja (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu MATE application menu vanishes shortly after opening every time it is clicked on" [Undecided, New]
[03:59] <arraybolt3> (It's not happening every single time in the latest beta RC, but it's happening quite a bit.)
[05:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: otf2 (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.0.2-1ubuntu2 => 3.0.2-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted otf2 [source] (lunar-proposed) [3.0.2-1ubuntu3]
[05:10] <vorlon> arraybolt3: might want to make sure you're addressing yourself to the mate flavor folks
[05:10] <arraybolt3> Mmm, good idea :P
[05:10] <arraybolt3> In which case -flavors might be more appropriate.
[06:30] <LocutusOfBorg> so llvm-toolchain-16 failed also with parallel=3?
[07:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus (lunar-proposed/main) [1.5.28-2 => 1.5.28-3] (i386-whitelist, input-methods, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-banagher-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton-banagher-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[07:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-cappy-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[07:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton-cappy-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-caressa-meta [sync] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton-caressa-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed/none) [22.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-banagher-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-caressa-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton-cappy-meta [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abdalah-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abdulkareem-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-abdalah-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-abdulkareem-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abe-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-abe-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[08:36] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, are we still on freeze?
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Core amd64 edge [Lunar Beta] has been updated (20230330)
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abedabun-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-abedabun-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-abednego-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.simon-abednego-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abeeku-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-abeeku-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abdullah-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.newell-abdullah-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-abdulrahman-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.simon-abdulrahman-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-balin-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.simon-balin-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-ballard-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-balint-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.simon-ballard-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abdalah-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abdullah-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abedabun-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-abdulrahman-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-balin-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abdulkareem-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abeeku-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-ballard-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-abe-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-abednego-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-sutton.simon-balint-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.simon-balint-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Minimal amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sox (lunar-proposed/universe) [14.4.2+git20190427-3.4ubuntu1 => 14.4.2+git20190427-3.5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync)
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fever (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.3.4-1ubuntu1 => 1.3.5-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fever [sync] (lunar-proposed) [1.3.5-1]
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu WSL [Lunar Beta] has been updated (4563244362)
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11 (jammy-proposed/main) [11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04 => 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross (jammy-proposed/main) [11ubuntu1.1 => 11ubuntu1.2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross-ports (jammy-proposed/universe) [8ubuntu1.1 => 8ubuntu1.2] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (jammy-proposed) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.04.0]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0]
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (bionic-proposed) [2023c-0ubuntu0.18.04.0]
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (focal-proposed) [2023c-0ubuntu0.20.04.0]
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (focal-proposed) [2023c-0ubuntu0.20.04.0]
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (jammy-proposed) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.04.0]
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (bionic-proposed) [2023c-0ubuntu0.18.04.0]
[12:47] <ahasenack> hi release team, when the rush of the beta release is over, I would appreciate some eyes on this FFe for isc-kea: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-kea/+bug/2007312
[12:47] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2007312 in isc-kea (Ubuntu) "FFe: Unrestricted default RESTful interface on 127.0.0.1:8000" [High, In Progress]
[12:47] <ahasenack> it's not seeded, nor in main
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsigc++-3.0 (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1ubuntu3 => 3.4.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsigc++-3.0 [sync] (lunar-proposed) [3.4.0-2]
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.818]
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: feedbackd (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1 => 0.1.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted feedbackd [sync] (lunar-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [27.14.1~18.04.1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [27.14.1~20.04.1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [27.14.1~22.04.1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (kinetic-proposed) [27.14.1~22.10.1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [27.14.1~18.04.1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [27.14.1~22.04.1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [27.14.1~20.04.1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (kinetic-proposed) [27.14.1~22.10.1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.14.1~16.04.1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.14.1~16.04.1]
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted im-config [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.50-2ubuntu22.04.1]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyroute2 [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.6.4-3ubuntu2]
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (kinetic-proposed/main) [2023b-0ubuntu0.22.10.0 => 2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0] (core)
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rocr-runtime [source] (jammy-proposed) [5.0.0-1ubuntu0.1]
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (lunar-proposed/main) [2.817 => 2.818] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openstack-trove (lunar-proposed/universe) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:19.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[14:25] <bdrung> rbasak, Thanks for the detailed response. I stripped down the tzdata SRU to the absolute minimum. Can you review the kinetic tzdata SRU? If you are happy with that, I will prepare it for the other releases as well.
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.818]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-settings [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.04.4]
[14:30] <rbasak> bdrung: yes, but I have meetings starting in a bit. I'm not sure if I'll be able to finish that review today.
[14:38] <vorlon> omg omg the kernel testsuite migrated to python3, I can finish removing python2 from lunar now
[14:39] <vorlon> jbicha: really, there was no reason to manually forcesync libsigc++-3.0 during feature freeze.  It just causes archive+autopkgtest churn
[14:53] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: I'll break out the champagne bottles for you.
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Unity Desktop amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Edubuntu Desktop amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[15:19] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, removing python2 makes me feel... old
[15:29] <vorlon> doko: dict-zu is an Ubuntu-only package containing a zulu dictionary that build-depends on python2.  It feels wrong for Ubuntu to drop this.  You are by far the most frequent uploader of the past 15 years ;)  Do you want to take a look at porting
[15:30] <vorlon> ?
[15:58] <ginggs> vorlon: i wonder if that python3 dependency is no longer used, the other dict-* packages don't have it, e.g. dict-af, dict-xh
[15:58] <ginggs> i'll take a look
[15:59] <ginggs> err, i mean python2, fingers autocorrected
[16:16] <jbicha> ubuntu-release: please mark Ubuntu Desktop's beta images as Ready except for raspi
[16:18] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-release: ItzSwirlz might not be available to say so, but Ubuntu Cinnamon will need a respin for the Friefox snap as he had it in parentheses following the pattern for recommends.
[16:19] <Eickmeyer> bug 302
[16:19] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 302 in libflash (Ubuntu) "firefox hangs with flash plugin installed on certain sites" [Medium, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/302
[16:19] <Eickmeyer> ioe
[16:19] <Eickmeyer> ope
[16:19] <Eickmeyer> bug 2013368
[16:19] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2013368 in ubuntucinnamon-meta (Ubuntu) "Firefox is missing in Ubuntu Cinnamon" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2013368
[16:20] <Eickmeyer> Although, arraybolt3[m], considering ItzSwirlz already fixed that, it just needed a respin and snaps can't be fixed in the metapackage.
[16:28] <arraybolt3> Eickmeyer: Didn't know how to file a bug against the seed, so the metapackage was the closest I could figure.
[16:28] <arraybolt3> (The seed won't let me report a bug against it directly.
[16:29] <Eickmeyer> arraybolt3: Yeah, you can't. He already had it fixed, though.
[16:29] <Eickmeyer> There just hasn't been a respin since.
[16:29] <arraybolt3> Ah.
[16:34] <ginggs> respinning cinnamon...
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[16:40] <tsimonq2> Lubuntu ✅️
[16:41] <Eickmeyer> *a wild tsimonq2 appears!*
[16:41] <tsimonq2> Oh hi!
[16:42] <Eickmeyer> o/
[16:54] <ginggs> jbicha: done
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dict-zu (lunar-proposed/main) [20070207-5ubuntu3 => 20070207-5ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[17:07] <bdmurray> Where are the cinnamon seeds?
[17:07] <bdmurray> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntucinnamon-dev/ubuntu-seeds
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Cinnamon Desktop amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been updated (20230330)
[17:09] <bdmurray> manifest looks good https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntucinnamon/daily-live/20230330/lunar-desktop-amd64.manifest
[17:12] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I've got https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntucinnamon-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntucinnamon/
[17:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (jammy-backports) [1:7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1~bpo22.04.1]
[17:12] <Eickmeyer> Is the script activated?
[17:13] <Eickmeyer> I'll give Cinnamon a smoke test.
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (focal-backports) [1:7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1~bpo20.04.1]
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-backports) [1:7.4.6-0ubuntu0.22.10.1~bpo18.04.1]
[17:20] <vorlon> ginggs: utils/csv2acor.py is /usr/bin/python2.  so some source changes are needed here beyond simply removing the build-dep
[17:21] <ginggs> vorlon: that's not used in the build though
[17:21] <vorlon> zu/myspell/zu_aff.py either?
[17:22] <ginggs> i ran 2to3 on zu/myspell/zu_aff.py
[17:22] <ginggs> vorlon: oh, you aren't looking at my upload
[17:22] <vorlon> ginggs: no :)
[17:22] <ginggs> ah
[17:23] <vorlon> if you've sorted it, great, thanks!
[17:23] <ginggs> vorlon: np
[17:23] <vorlon> and https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/lunar_uninst.txt is now beautiful
[17:23] <vorlon> (no more python2.7)
[17:24] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Congratulations!
[17:25] <Eickmeyer> arraybolt3: Latest Cinnamon image has Firefox.
[17:26] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: Can you close that bug then?
[17:26] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Already done.
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-voikko (lunar-proposed/main) [5.0-4build1 => 5.0-4build2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:06] <arraybolt3> umm... the ISO tracker is still pointing to the 20230329.1 image for Cinnamon, not the 20230330 one I'm pulling now.
[18:11] <ginggs> arraybolt3: what URL are you looking at?
[18:12] <arraybolt3> ginggs: The one my browser's back button took me to which is now outdated. :facepalm:
[18:13] <arraybolt3> I even hit Refresh thinking that would make sure it wasn't outdated.
[18:16] <ginggs> arraybolt3: ok :)
[19:04] <seb128> vorlon, hey, is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iwd/+bug/2012081 still on your list or did I miss something to get it back to the release team for consideration?
[19:04] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2012081 in iwd (Ubuntu) "[FFe] update to the current upstream version 2.3" [Undecided, Confirmed]
[19:06] <jbicha> vorlon: are you leading the Beta release?
[19:08] <vorlon> jbicha: ginggs is
[19:09] <vorlon> seb128: well the bug report talked about pre-beta and I was unable to get back to you before beta freeze so I wasn't sure whether you still wanted to proceed
[19:09] <vorlon> I'm still wibbly about the regression risk but would be willing to take it immediately post-beta if that's what you want
[19:09] <seb128> vorlon, it's in universe and not on any image so technically if doesn't make a real difference if it made it in time for the ISO builds
[19:10] <vorlon> true
[19:10] <seb128> I would be fine with landing it after beta yes
[19:10] <vorlon> but you had said "the change would land before beta" and as this is no longer true, I was unsure
[19:11] <vorlon> seb128: acked on the bug
[19:11] <seb128> right, I would have preferred to have it reviewed earlier but I still think the rational for updating stand
[19:11] <seb128> I can update the description
[19:11] <seb128> vorlon, thanks
[19:14] <jbicha> ginggs: maybe we don't release raspi images for Ubuntu Desktop Beta anyway? so it doesn't matter whether it's marked ready?
[19:15] <waveform> if you can give me 30 minutes, I'll have the raspi images marked on the ISO tracker
[19:16] <ginggs> waveform: sure
[19:23] <AlsoItzSwirlz> \o/ Cinnamon doesn't have a release team on launchpad, so, can someone mark Ubuntu Cinnamon Beta image as ready?
[19:35] <ginggs> AlsoItzSwirlz: .
[19:36] <AlsoItzSwirlz> *cueue jeopardy music as we wait for queuebot to send the message*
[19:36] <AlsoItzSwirlz> ginggs: thanks
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Cinnamon Desktop amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[19:47] <waveform> ginggs, done Pi 4 4GB and Pi400 tests of the raspi desktop image, marked in ISO tracker as passed with the usual issues
[19:48] <ginggs> waveform: ta!
[19:57] <AlsoItzSwirlz> when was ubuntu desktop arm64 approved?
[19:57] <AlsoItzSwirlz> I'm running it in a VM right now and I'm stuck at gdm3 login (yes, username ubuntu and passord ubuntu didn't work)
[19:57] <jbicha> waveform: ^
[19:58] <AlsoItzSwirlz> (I'm on an M1 and I'm glad I can at least virtualize this instead of go through the pain of emulating it)
[20:00] <bdmurray> Ubuntu desktop arm64 should not be listed
[20:00]  * AlsoItzSwirlz sighs realizing he downloaded a pointless image
[20:00] <AlsoItzSwirlz> bdmurray: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/444/builds/275083/testcases
[20:01] <AlsoItzSwirlz> maybe i can virtualize a raspi?
[20:01] <AlsoItzSwirlz> well the tests are meant to be done for real hardware, hm
[20:04] <waveform> I doubt you can virtualize a raspi -- the boot sequence is very "special" (starts on the GPU, custom bootloader, etc.)
[20:04] <arraybolt3> Great. Looks like Ubuntu MATE OEM installation is b0rked.
[20:04] <arraybolt3> Not too bad though, a couple of reboots and I managed to get it to get through.
[20:04] <jbicha> yeah, Desktop arm64 wasn't present for Kinetic Beta http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/439/builds
[20:05] <arraybolt3> That crummy Caja bug is causing some problems.
[20:05] <AlsoItzSwirlz> going to try ubuntu base on macos, hopefully nothing goes wrong!
[20:06] <arraybolt3> AlsoItzSwirlz: That's probably going to be running an Ubuntu userland on a Darwin kernel, just fyi.
[20:06] <arraybolt3> Not sure if it will work, and it is likely not the test case the Ubuntu team had in mind.
[20:06] <AlsoItzSwirlz> yeah thats what it is basically, and it is definitely not what the team has in mind but i'll do it
[20:06] <AlsoItzSwirlz> *try
[20:07] <arraybolt3> :) Good luck!
[20:08] <arraybolt3> I'm over here doing wacky testing too :P Don't ever mix an OEM install with no Internet, lesson learned.
[20:10] <AlsoItzSwirlz> exec format error on an arm host, nice
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[21:19] <ItzSwirlz> wsl is done
[21:20] <ItzSwirlz> in about an hour and a half ill start knocking out kubuntu manual partitioning + non-english
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcupsfilters (lunar-proposed/main) [2.0~b4-0ubuntu5 => 2.0~b4-0ubuntu6] (no packageset)
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu WSL [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:50] <ItzSwirlz> downloading server subiquity riscv64 for testing
[23:50] <ItzSwirlz> will be slow but oh well
[23:54] <arraybolt3> ItzSwirlz: I don't think you can test those. All of the test cases for riscv are for specific physical hardware.
[23:55] <arraybolt3> nvm, I was wrong.
[23:55] <arraybolt3> Proceed, sorry for the confusion.
[23:55]  * arraybolt3 stops being frustrating on accident
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Lunar Beta] has been marked as ready
[23:57] <ItzSwirlz> arraybolt3: np i was surprised when i found someone with a testcase submission for riscv and i was like "how do they have one" but it was a qemu case