[08:14] <guiverc> i'm doing checks after a QA-install; 'install using existing partition' which is the repair type install; contrasting packages BEFORE & AFTER .. our new install has telnet????? why?
[08:15]  * guiverc I've noted people talking about telnet before (~recently), but alas took little notice as to why..
 Ubuntu base has telnet
 It is on server too
 To be fair it is the Telnet client and not the server daemon.
[08:17] <guiverc> has it always had it, I don't see it on my prior install?  (last friday from memory; 20230329 ISO save doesn't have it... but I could be missing something my end too
 It has been around for a bit, maybe always.
 I'm pretty sure we checked and it was on Jammy
[08:19] <guiverc> i realize that, and thanks kc2bez, the difference I'm staring out I wonder is something related to my install  (I think 0329 was the first lunar install on box; that install was focal before then)
 I am not sure when but it was noticed earlier in the cycle too. If I had to guess something was missing on the 0329 install if it wasn't there.
 Focal might not have had it.
[08:23] <guiverc> nah i think it was there then; manual check of the --manual-installed after that install has it.. i suspect now it's my procedural issue  (maybe not today; a week ago?)
[08:24] <guiverc> anyway install is good; just noticed telnet/fortune/cowsay/figlet unexpectidely in the diffs of packages (none are critical with 3 being ones I install & check for!)
[08:25]  * guiverc had checked fortune|cowsay which gave me a bad joke... thus as expected!
 :D