=== sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie === sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie [14:19] ahasenack: fancy reviewing https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/git-ubuntu/+git/usd-importer/+merge/440324 for me please? [14:20] sure [22:04] Hi there, I need a new attempt for the autopkgtest tried, the links follow: [22:04] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=amd64&package=ormar&trigger=python-databases%2F0.7.0-1&trigger=sqlalchemy%2F1.4.46%2Bds1-1build1 [22:04] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=amd64&package=python-databases&trigger=sqlalchemy%2F1.4.46%2Bds1-1build1 [22:05] --end of links. This is to break the migration dependency cycle: ormar -> python-databases -> sqlalchemy -> ormar [22:05] Thank you in advance! [22:09] And also, can someone retry https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sccache/0.4.0~~pre7-1/+build/25585940 this build on armhf? There was a compiler OOM during the local linking phase (where rustc links the object files within one library) [22:14] Only the first autopkgtest link worked. The second one failed b/c `Package python-databases does not have any test results` [22:14] I should be able to sort that out [22:15] I've retried the sccache build for you [22:16] Actually, I can't (or won't right now!) sort out running python-databases autopkgtests because there aren't any! [22:20] bdmurray: I see. So something has to do the initial run before manually triggered run could be performed? [22:20] liushuyu: no, the package python-databases doesn't contain any autopkgtests - somebody would need to write some [22:21] Oh I see [22:21] That's probably why the issue wasn't discovered in the python-databases package [22:44] The sccache package failed with out of memory again. Should I add this package to https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs/tree/big_packages this list? [22:46] No, the package build environment (Launchpad) is different than the autopkgtest environment. The autopkgtest-package-configs affects the latter. [23:42] liushuyu: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar/lunar/amd64/o/ormar/20230406_221837_d2d10@/log.gz passed [23:45] bdmurray: Yay. And sqlalchemy, ormar and python-databases migrated altogether [23:46] For sccache, is there a procedure to make the builder increase the RAM limitation alone? [23:47] No [23:48] Also it's probably not actually about the amount of physical RAM that the builder has, given that it only failed on armhf [23:49] It's more likely to be that it's a 32-bit architecture so it's running in a 4GB address space or smaller [23:49] Hey! Could any ubuntu-archive admin check LP: #2002861 and promote isc-kea and log4cplus? [23:49] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2002861 in isc-kea (Ubuntu) "[MIR] promote isc-kea to main" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2002861 [23:50] liushuyu: ^ There is nothing that Launchpad can do to change that. The package will need to be changed to use compiler/linker options that use less memory (or else give up on building on 32-bit arches) [23:51] cjwatson: Okay, I will see how I can make the compiler use less memory [23:52] Yeah, in some cases in the past this has been possible, but I don't know the specifics here [23:53] Well, turning off LTO should be the first angle of attack [23:54] Sounds wise