[17:06] <ahasenack> sdeziel: hi, in your dnssec bind9 zones, do you have the "inling-signing yes" config parameter?
[17:07] <ahasenack> I'm looking at how common the scenario described here would be: https://kb.isc.org/docs/dnssec-policy-requires-dynamic-dns-or-inline-signing
[17:07] <ahasenack> and you are my sample #1 :)
[17:07] <ahasenack> I'm worried about upgrades hitting this problem if the existing dnssec zones are configured like that. bind9 will refuse to start after the upgrade in that case:
[17:07] <ahasenack> Apr 10 16:55:12 f-bind9-mre named[2902]: /etc/bind/named.conf.local:12: 'inline-signing yes;' must also be configured explicitly for zones using dnssec-policy 
[17:07] <ahasenack> without a configured 'allow-update' or 'update-policy'. See https://kb.isc.org/docs/dnssec-policy-requires-dynamic-dns-or-inline-signing
[18:15] <sergiodj> ahasenack: regarding your comment in the MP: I remember glancing over this release note entry, but for some reason I did not raise this topic while reviewing the Jammy/Kinetic MREs.  I may have been distracted by something else
[18:16] <sergiodj> either way, it's a good catch and I believe it warrants *at least* a note on d/NEWS
[18:16] <sergiodj> I'm not sure how to proceed with the Jammy/Kinetic updates, since they've been release already
[19:26] <MrsSkilton> https://pastes.io/3zb8ipyqbv
[19:31] <oerheks> ignore MrsSkilton 
[19:31] <MrsSkilton> Learn about Richard Simmons being date raped by Mrs. Skilton, the big-elbowed seductress from Regina!
[19:31] <MrsSkilton> https://pastes.io/3zb8ipyqbv