[00:00] <vorlon> tillkamppeter: done
[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups-filters [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]
[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (lunar-proposed) [1:44.0-1ubuntu5]
[00:04] <vorlon> tillkamppeter: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html shows autopkgtest regressions with libcupsfilters
[00:04] <vorlon> (for cups-browsed)
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-base1.0 (lunar-proposed/main) [1.22.1-1 => 1.22.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[00:11] <tillkamppeter> Thanks @vorlon. I will tomorrow also upload the rc1 of cups-browsed, will then see what needs to be fixed there.
[00:12] <jbicha> vorlon: there's your gstreamer fix ^ :)
[00:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libppd (lunar-proposed/main) [2:2.0~b4-0ubuntu4 => 2:2.0~rc1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[00:13] <coreycb> bdmurray: I've updated that comment, it was meant to say kinetic-proposed
[00:14] <tsimonq2> tillkamppeter, vorlon: ^^^ libppd per bug 2015938
[00:14] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2015938 in libppd (Ubuntu) "Sponsor upload for libppd 2.0~rc1-0ubuntu1" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2015938
[00:14] <mdeslaur> crud, looks like I managed to send dotnet6 and dotnet7 to lunar-security instead of lunar-proposed...can an AA fix that?
[00:16] <vorlon> looking
[00:19] <vorlon> mdeslaur: done
[00:19] <mdeslaur> thanks vorlon, much appreciated
[00:19] <tillkamppeter> Thanks a lot @tsimonq2 !
[00:21] <tillkamppeter> @vorlon,, could you approve libppd for me now? Thanks.
[00:21] <vorlon> tillkamppeter: I'm working through the queue now
[00:22] <tillkamppeter> @vorlon, thanks.
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mozjs102 [sync] (lunar-proposed) [102.10.0-1]
[00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ibus [sync] (lunar-proposed) [1.5.28-4]
[00:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-base1.0 [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.22.1-1ubuntu1]
[00:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libppd [source] (lunar-proposed) [2:2.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]
[00:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-criterion (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-2 => 0.4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-criterion [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.4.0-2ubuntu1]
[00:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hg-git (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1 => 1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hg-git [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1]
[01:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: git-annex (lunar-proposed/universe) [8.20210223-2ubuntu3 => 10.20230126-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted git-annex [sync] (lunar-proposed) [10.20230126-3]
[01:56] <vorlon> apw: some of the failure to detect NBS *may* have had to do the fact that packages of those names were not NBS on riscv64 where they are built from a different source package :|
[02:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: toybox (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.8.9+dfsg-1 => 0.8.9+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[02:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted toybox [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.8.9+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[02:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (lunar-proposed/main) [1.76.0-1 => 1.76.0-2] (desktop-core, desktop-extra, i386-whitelist, mozilla)
[03:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gjs [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.76.0-2]
[03:11] <Trevinho> ouch just noticed a  regression in that gjs upload... :(
[03:15] <vorlon> Trevinho: ok, I'll delete from -proposed to avoid wasting autopkgtest time
[03:15] <Trevinho> vorlon: thanks, I wanted to ping just when I got the approval email
[03:24] <vorlon> why does esmtp have such a stupid package split
[03:24] <vorlon> who wants to install an MTA on their system but avoid declaring it to be the MTA
[03:25] <vorlon> <grumble context="https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/component-mismatches.html"/>
[03:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (lunar-proposed/main) [1.76.0-1 => 1.76.0-3] (desktop-core, desktop-extra, i386-whitelist, mozilla)
[03:44] <Trevinho> vorlon: ^ should be fine now
[03:46] <vorlon> Trevinho: accepted
[03:46] <Trevinho> thanks
[03:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gjs [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.76.0-3]
[04:44] <Trevinho> this is also quite needed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgusb/+bug/2015952
[04:44] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2015952 in libgusb (Ubuntu) "libgusb-dev is missing libjson-glib-dev dependency" [High, In Progress]
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (kinetic-proposed) [3.6.4-1ubuntu2.1]
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected postfix [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.6.8-1ubuntu0.22.04]
[06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.6.4-1ubuntu1.1]
[06:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: diffoscope (lunar-proposed/universe) [240 => 240ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted diffoscope [source] (lunar-proposed) [240ubuntu1]
[07:19] <tjaalton> sil2100: hey, there's a new mesa point-release available, would it be ok to upload for lunar release?
[07:21] <sil2100> tjaalton: bugfix-only, right? Yeah, this should be fine
[07:23] <tjaalton> sil2100: correct, no new features
[07:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (lunar-proposed/main) [23.0.1-1ubuntu1 => 23.0.2-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[07:28] <tjaalton> there
[07:41] <ginggs> tjaalton: would you build the source package with -v23.0.1-1ubuntu1 please?
[07:42] <tjaalton> ginggs: ok
[07:43] <ginggs> tjaalton: thanks, rejecting this one then
[07:44] <tjaalton> oh actually, I did merge patches for adreno a690 support earlier, so this upload would have those as well, lp2015182
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.0.2-1ubuntu1]
[07:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (lunar-proposed/main) [23.0.1-1ubuntu1 => 23.0.2-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[07:52] <tjaalton> this should have a better diff to review.. a690 support is three patches
[07:53] <ginggs> tjaalton: thanks!
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.0.2-1ubuntu1]
[07:58] <tjaalton> thanks :)
[08:15] <jamespage> vorlon: thanks - yep that's correct - the MIR team requested the package be bought up-to-date; we looked but that was going to pull in a whole load more scope for the MIR quite late in the cycle
[08:15] <jamespage> one to pickup in +1
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl-ibmca (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-0ubuntu1 => 2.4.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sqlmap (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.7.3-1 => 1.7.4-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl-ibmca [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.4.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sqlmap [sync] (lunar-proposed) [1.7.4-1]
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: intel-media-driver (jammy-proposed/universe) [22.3.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1 => 22.3.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: intel-media-driver-non-free (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [22.3.1+ds1-1 => 22.3.1+ds1-1ubuntu0.1] (i386-whitelist)
[08:51] <jamespage> if there are any sru team members around - please could we get the openvswitch upload in jammy UNAPPROVED accepted into proposed? bug 2003060
[08:51] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2003060 in openvswitch (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] openvswitch 2.17.5 point release" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2003060
[08:52] <jamespage> that's blocking the ovn point release that was accepted a while back (currently dep waiting)
[08:52] <jamespage> fnordahl: ^^ fyi (no action needed)
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfprint (lunar-proposed/main) [1:1.94.5+tod1-0ubuntu1 => 1:1.94.5+tod1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[08:55] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, hello, black is blocked by diffoscope
[08:55] <LocutusOfBorg> the test failing on armhf of diffoscope is a new test
[08:55] <LocutusOfBorg> "test_arsc.py::test_differences"
[08:56] <LocutusOfBorg> so, its not a regression w.r.t. release to hint diffoscope/armhf (specially because I tested locally on armhf pbuilder and works, its probably some race condition in tool call)
[08:56] <LocutusOfBorg> this makes diffoscope and black finally migrate, since new diffoscope contains fixes for new black
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> oh well, ginggs did upload an hacky fix :)
[08:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgusb (lunar-proposed/main) [0.4.5-1 => 0.4.5-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> (not too hacky!)
[08:58] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: pff
[08:58] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, since you did some investigation do you agree that it might be due to aapk2 race condition?
[09:04] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: at this stage, i'd agree it might be anything :)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iwd (lunar-proposed/universe) [2.3-1ubuntu1 => 2.4-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iwd [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.4-0ubuntu1]
[10:15] <xnox> vorlon:  apw: re ipu6/ivsc popping out without meta deps => there should be meta deps for them, and those meta deps did exist in the previous release. So them trying to get demoted, indicates a bug somewhere.
[10:16] <xnox> $ reverse-depends linux-modules-ipu6-6.2.0-20-generic
[10:17] <xnox> Reverse-Depends
[10:17] <xnox> * linux-modules-ipu6-generic
[10:17] <xnox> * linux-modules-ipu6-generic-hwe-22.04
[10:17] <xnox> * linux-modules-ipu6-generic-hwe-22.04-edge
[10:17] <xnox> Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in: amd64
[10:17] <xnox> guessing all of that got fixed up, as i see nothing in components-missmatches today
[10:49] <LocutusOfBorg> hello xnox, (speaking w.r.t. lunar+1 not lunar, feel free to answer ENOTIME :) ) I was looking at dkms autopkgtests failing in Ubuntu but not in Debian due to this additional log being printed
[10:49] <LocutusOfBorg> "Secure Boot not enabled on this system."
[10:49] <LocutusOfBorg> I think adding to shim-signed something like https://salsa.debian.org/efi-team/shim-signed/-/commit/d86d67180264b6d3b7364d35c44f527738dc2ed6
[10:49] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit d86d671 in efi-team/shim-signed "fix error if /var/lib/dkms does not exist. Closes: #923718"
[10:49] <LocutusOfBorg> might fix the issue, what do you think?
[10:53] <LocutusOfBorg> this might fix arm64, while for amd64 I have no clues
[11:13] <LocutusOfBorg> are autopkgtests in Ubuntu not having EFI enabled?
[11:20] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, hello, I think I fixed llvm-16 to work with cmake detection, nothing should be preventing anymore the appearance of llvm-spirv-16
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cups-browsed (lunar-proposed/main) [2.0~b4-0ubuntu2 => 2.0~rc1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:28] <tillkamppeter> Hi, someone can approve cups-browsed for me? It fixes the failed autopkgtest which prevents the -proposed migration of libcupsfilters and in addition it fixes bug 2014976.
[11:28] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2014976 in cups-browsed (Ubuntu) "CUPS doesnt work anymore with my HP Printer" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2014976
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfprint [source] (lunar-proposed) [1:1.94.5+tod1-0ubuntu2]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgusb [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.4.5-1ubuntu1]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smarty3 (lunar-proposed/universe) [3.1.39-2ubuntu1 => 3.1.39-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups-browsed [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smarty3 [source] (lunar-proposed) [3.1.39-2ubuntu2]
[11:58] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: that's good, I think anbe was working on that
[12:03] <LocutusOfBorg> yeah he opened the bug I fixed yesterday
[12:03] <LocutusOfBorg> it was just FYI :)
[12:34] <tjaalton> sure
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openstack-trove (lunar-proposed/universe) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu3 => 2:19.0.0-0ubuntu4] (openstack)
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openstack-trove [source] (lunar-proposed) [2:19.0.0-0ubuntu4]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-rtsp-server1.0 (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.22.1-1 => 1.22.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-rtsp-server1.0 [sync] (lunar-proposed) [1.22.2-1]
[13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-libav1.0 (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.22.1-1 => 1.22.2-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync)
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-libav1.0 [sync] (lunar-proposed) [1.22.2-1]
[13:40] <ginggs> jbicha: bugs like LP: #2015943 are helpful for accepting syncs, thanks!
[13:40] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2015943 in gst-rtsp-server1.0 (Ubuntu) "gstreamer 1.22.2 bugfix release" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2015943
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: memtest86+ (jammy-backports/main) [5.31b+dfsg-4 => 6.10-4~bpo22.04.1] (desktop-core)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted memtest86+ [source] (jammy-backports) [6.10-4~bpo22.04.1]
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: seabios (lunar-proposed/main) [1.16.0-5 => 1.16.2-1] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: screen-resolution-extra (lunar-proposed/main) [0.18.2 => 0.18.3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: icu (lunar-proposed/main) [72.1-3ubuntu1 => 72.1-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dotnet6 (lunar-proposed/universe) [6.0.116-0ubuntu1 => 6.0.116-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dotnet6 [sync] (lunar-proposed) [6.0.116-0ubuntu2]
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted icu [source] (lunar-proposed) [72.1-3ubuntu2]
[15:51] <vorlon> jbicha: rationale for seabios sync?
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted screen-resolution-extra [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.18.3]
[15:53] <jbicha> vorlon: I saw Debian bug 1034296
[15:53] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1034296 in release.debian.org "unblock: seabios/1.16.2-1" [Normal, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1034296
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssh (focal-proposed/main) [1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.6 => 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.7] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:56] <vorlon> jbicha: which has not been approved by the Debian release team.  And Debian isn't a week out from release, the risk/reward calculus is not the same. Nacking.
[15:56] <jbicha> thanks
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected seabios [sync] (lunar-proposed) [1.16.2-1]
[16:27] <sil2100> bdmurray, vorlon, ginggs: I uploaded a new ubiquity with translation updates, please review and hopefully accept!
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (lunar-proposed/main) [23.04.6 => 23.04.7] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-dev-tools (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.193 => 0.193ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (lunar-proposed) [0.193ubuntu1]
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.04.7]
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (kinetic-security/main) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0 => 2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0] (core) (sync)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.17.5-0ubuntu0.22.04.1]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (kinetic-security/main) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0 => 2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0] (core) (sync)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (lunar-proposed/main) [2.822 => 2.823] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[17:44] <vorlon> ... desktop-core?
[17:49] <vorlon> bdmurray: ^^ above livecd-rootfs should be a fix for PROPOSED=1 builds not working
[17:54] <vorlon> seb128: hey, I didn't see a response to you wrt the i386 manual-seeding question; did you want me to update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#i386_whitelist_updates directly or just explain it?
[17:56] <bdmurray> vorlon: looking
[17:58] <bdmurray> vorlon: speaking of I forget where the NotAutomatic proposed changes puts us for SRU testing
[17:58] <vorlon> bdmurray: my recollection from the mailing list discussion was that the wiki instructions did not need changed
[17:59] <vorlon> part of the point of NotAutomatic is that you can have -proposed enabled without it causing packages you don't want to be pulled from there
[17:59] <vorlon> since SRU testing generally says "enable proposed then install package foo", we're good
[18:00] <vorlon> maybe it needs to say "install package foo/lunar-proposed", I don't recall
[18:01] <bdmurray> Okay, but this make it easier to do SRU testing for Lunar as you don't need to enable -proposed and be extra careful correct?
[18:02] <vorlon> that's the idea yes
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.823]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (kinetic-security/main) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0 => 2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0] (core) (sync)
[18:20] <vorlon> doing a test amd64 desktop build with livecd-rootfs from proposed to confirm it works as intended; please ignore!
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (lunar-proposed/main) [3.1.0-1 => 3.1.0-1ubuntu1] (core)
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [sync] (kinetic-security) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0]
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [sync] (kinetic-security) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [sync] (kinetic-security) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.0]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-16 (lunar-proposed/universe) [1:16.0.0-1~exp5ubuntu2 => 1:16.0.0-1~exp5ubuntu3] (i386-whitelist)
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-16 [source] (lunar-proposed) [1:16.0.0-1~exp5ubuntu3]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: carla (jammy-backports/universe) [2.4.2-0ubuntu2 => 2.5.4-0ubuntu2~bpo22.04.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio)
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aptdaemon (lunar-proposed/main) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu42 => 1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu43] (desktop-core)
[18:40] <juliank> vorlon: do we want to accept the aptdaemon FTBFS fix? That will also fix the test suite in the release pocket then which would be nice
[18:42] <juliank> It has a bug in the changelog so it can be tracked as an SRU too
[18:43] <juliank> But the interesting part is having it in release or updates so that the baseline migration status is a pass again :)
[18:50] <juliank> maybe I should have investigated why DistUtilsExtra is not automatically registered without imports
[18:50] <juliank> but adding the imports sure works
[18:53] <juliank> I forgot pleading emoji: 🥺
[18:58] <bdmurray> That's not an emoji I'm familiar with.
[19:05] <juliank> i mean it's big sad puppy eyes
[19:17] <bdmurray> vorlon: u-r-u for you to review for lunar
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (lunar-proposed/main) [1:23.04.3 => 1:23.04.4] (core)
[19:25]  * bdmurray is looking at the package uploaded by the developer with the big sad puppy eyes
[19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aptdaemon [source] (lunar-proposed) [1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu43]
[19:31] <juliank> thanks bdmurray
[19:31] <juliank> 🎉
[19:42] <vorlon> my PROPOSED=1 test build fired too early before livecd-rootfs 2.823 was seen; rerunning
[19:43] <vorlon> bdmurray: looking
[19:44] <vorlon> accepted
[19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (lunar-proposed) [1:23.04.4]
[19:50] <vorlon> mv: cannot stat 'chroot/etc/apt/preferences.d/proposed.pref.orig': No such file or directory
[19:50] <vorlon> as I was saying elsewhere, I really hate live-build
[19:51] <vorlon> I guess in this case I should bugfix live-build
[19:51] <dbungert> 😱
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: live-build (lunar-proposed/main) [3.0~a57-1ubuntu43 => 3.0~a57-1ubuntu44] (desktop-core)
[20:02] <vorlon> bdmurray: ^^ the above fixes a bug in live-build so that we can fix the bug in livecd-rootfs
[20:03] <bdmurray> Is this why the latest lunar amd64 build failed?
[20:04] <vorlon> yes
[20:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted live-build [source] (lunar-proposed) [3.0~a57-1ubuntu44]
[20:41] <vorlon> Setting up libfprint-2-2:amd64 (1:1.94.5+tod1-0ubuntu2) ...
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:41] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <arraybolt3> ^C
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <bdmurray> somebody should kick that guy out
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> Running in chroot, ignoring request.
[20:42] <vorlon> [...]
[20:43] <vorlon> what the what
[20:43] <vorlon> (yes that was spammy, that's *truncated* output)
[20:43] <mclemenceau_> haha
[20:43] <vorlon> $ grep -c udevadm.trigger debian/libfprint-2-2.postinst
[20:43] <vorlon> 272
[20:43] <vorlon> there has GOT to be a better way to implement that
[20:45] <ahasenack> before you try anything else, disable your copy&paste ability
[20:45] <ahasenack> :D
[20:48] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  i would like you to stop uploading and syncing things directly into Ubuntu. If you want to test changes to things, lets start by uploading or syncing changes to a bileto ppa and run autopkgtests and testing there. including rebuilds of kernels & lrm. Such that you learn things you are touching. Although many people have upload rights to shim-signed, in practice, those
[20:48] <xnox> uploads go through a much more restricted set of people with far higher review barriers.
[20:49] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  i am happy to review and sponsor those things for you, out of the archive, to prevent the multiple disruptions you have been causing recently.
[20:49] <vorlon> shim-signed> what now
[20:49] <vorlon> is that just a random example?
[20:50] <xnox> 11:49:02 above LocutusOfBorg is asking about patching shim-signed, for real.
[20:50] <LocutusOfBorg> for lunar+1
[20:50] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure if next release will be called "real", I guess it will start with m?
[20:50] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  even for lunar+1 it is not appropriate for you to upload shim-signed.
[20:51] <LocutusOfBorg> I *never* said *anywhere* I want to touch shim*
[20:51] <LocutusOfBorg> specially that package is too scary to even think about it
[20:51] <LocutusOfBorg> the question was if a commit done in Debian was a possible fix for Ubuntu
[20:51] <LocutusOfBorg> that's all
[20:52] <xnox> you don't appear to have the same respect for dkms; as each upload of it triggers 30+ reverse tests, on per kernel basis (10-30 flavours depending on the time/release) invalidating cross-combinations of all of those tests.
[20:52] <xnox> on each arch, so circa of thousands reruns.
[20:52] <xnox> preventing, blocking, delaying migration of kernels.
[20:53] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg:  have you seen https://kernel.ubuntu.com/adt-matrix/ and like results it triggers on per package basis => i.e. https://kernel.ubuntu.com/adt-matrix/lunar-linux-meta.html
[20:54] <xnox> a dkms upload invalidates most of a given column
[20:54] <xnox> in a current cycle, for every kernel.
[20:55] <LocutusOfBorg> question is: how to run britney on ppa? since bileto is basically completely broken at least for me? (I'm speaking about not being able to even login!)
[20:55] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't know how to automatically trigger tests on ppa, so far I was able to test a package against itself
[20:56] <xnox> the results triggered inside proposed-migration/ is just tip of the iceberg.
[20:56] <xnox> there is a way to trigger autopkgtest against ppa without bileto.....
[20:56] <xnox> can't remember the details, but it was written down somewhere
[20:56] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm doing something like this:
[20:56] <LocutusOfBorg> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=lunar&arch=ppc64el&package=dkms&ppa=costamagnagianfranco/locutusofborg-ppa&trigger=dkms/3.0.10-8ubuntu4
[20:57] <LocutusOfBorg> but this is a test for a package against itself, I don't know how many reverse-test dependencies needs to be scheduled
[20:57] <LocutusOfBorg> bileto was doing all for me... :/
[20:58] <LocutusOfBorg> anyhow, day is over, g night :)
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (lunar-proposed/main) [2.26.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.26.1-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:31] <seb128> vorlon, hey, if you could update the wiki directly that would be great, thanks
[22:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: net-snmp (lunar-proposed/main) [5.9.3+dfsg-2ubuntu2 => 5.9.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[22:59] <vorlon> bdmurray: ok we got a successful proposed build with new livecd-rootfs+live-build https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/lunar/ubuntu/+build/434167
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted net-snmp [source] (lunar-proposed) [5.9.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3]
[23:22] <vorlon> bdmurray: u-r-u autopkgtest regressions across the board