[14:30] good morning [14:30] hello [14:30] o/ [14:31] hey! === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer [14:32] heyho [14:32] hello [14:32] #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status [14:32] Meeting started at 14:32:33 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [14:32] Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick [14:32] Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe ) [14:32] hopefully we are living the release week dream of having nothing to assign today :-) [14:33] #topic current component mismatches [14:33] Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams [14:33] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg [14:33] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg [14:33] jaraco is known and on openstack (jamespage) [14:33] nothing else ion mismatches [14:33] nothing else that isn't a false positive [14:33] #topic New MIRs [14:33] Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing [14:33] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:33] empty [14:34] looks like jaraco didn't make it this cycle, and the python-autocommand dependency got demoted back to universe for Lunar [14:34] (so far my plan works) [14:34] yep slyon [14:34] I mean, that was to be expected since no one doubled down on it [14:34] yes [14:34] #topic Incomplete bugs / questions [14:34] Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams [14:34] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:35] no updates since 11th April (last weeks meeting) [14:35] we have assigned a few last week, so let us see if they are in the security queue already [14:35] but first [14:35] PRs/issues to the process [14:35] #topic Process/Documentation improvements [14:35] Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues [14:35] #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls [14:35] #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues [14:35] 2x none [14:35] #topic MIR related Security Review Queue [14:35] Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? [14:35] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:35] Internal link [14:35] - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect [14:35] - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much [14:35] #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 [14:36] I don't believe we've made progress on any of these items this week, our resources have been focused on other priorities [14:36] yeah [14:36] that is - for once - ok sarnold [14:37] for now, heh :) [14:37] as no one has expected those cases to make it into 23.04 anyway [14:37] ACK [14:37] slyon: last weeks mentioning of heif made me check the state of HDR support [14:37] do not check it yourself, sad story [14:37] heh :( [14:37] might be a while until I can buy new screens [14:37] so this might be the release week meeting we all hoped for [14:38] quick, effective, nothing to do [14:38] #topic Any other business? [14:38] cpaelzer: okay... let me put that on Foundations' internal roadmap plan for libheif [14:38] I do have a hopefully quick question [14:38] re jaraco et al [14:38] sarnold: go [14:38] are those in lunar-proposed or are they in devel-proposed? [14:38] slyon: it is the desktop that needs to be able to display, even once you have the lib [14:38] cpaelzer: understood [14:38] slyon: but having the lib and diplsaing normal-dr is better than not displaying it at all [14:39] or, what keeps those from "promoting to main" via usual -proposed seven day aging thing? [14:39] right [14:39] .. post release [14:39] sarnold: the component mismatch holds them back [14:39] cpaelzer: yay [14:39] that is always a barrier to pass even on SRUs [14:40] and furthermore the release team usually clears remaining proposed IIRFC [14:40] IIRC [14:40] they either go in, or they go away [14:40] sarnold: also I think they are in "devel-proposed" (which doesn't really exist).. basically will be moved to "mm-proposed" once that exists [14:40] I've never seen a release go out with things in proposed not meant to be zero-day SRUs [14:40] this is release team magic which I haven't been part of [14:40] *nod* same here, always on the edges :) [14:41] but we never had to care about cases like this because they are doing great [14:41] *nod* [14:41] and sometimes I get to wondering how those things get enforced :) [14:41] thanks for the reassurance :) [14:41] yw [14:41] anything else? [14:41] are we skipping next week's? [14:42] some of us I guess, but I do not know how to announce [14:42] so I'd say, those who can join [14:42] and see if there is anything [14:42] and will quickly be over [14:42] hopefully as quickly as this one :) [14:42] for anyone external - the majority of people will be on a sprint next and even more in the week after [14:42] hence expect low participation here [14:42] good [14:42] I'd call this done for now then [14:42] any last words? [14:43] thanks cpaelzer, all :) [14:43] thanks, all! [14:43] thank you all! [14:43] #endmeeting [14:43] Meeting ended at 14:43:12 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-04-18-14.32.moin.txt [14:43] thanks cpaelzer,all :) [14:43] o/ [14:43] thanks!