[14:30] <sarnold> good morning
[14:30] <didrocks> hello
[14:30] <joalif> o/
[14:31] <slyon> hey!
[14:32] <cpaelzer> heyho
[14:32] <eslerm> hello
[14:32] <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
[14:32] <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:32:33 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[14:32] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[14:32] <cpaelzer> Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe )
[14:32] <cpaelzer> hopefully we are living the release week dream of having nothing to assign today :-)
[14:33] <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches
[14:33] <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
[14:33] <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
[14:33] <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
[14:33] <cpaelzer> jaraco is known and on openstack (jamespage)
[14:33] <cpaelzer> nothing else ion mismatches
[14:33] <cpaelzer> nothing else that isn't a false positive
[14:33] <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs
[14:33] <cpaelzer> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing
[14:33] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:33] <cpaelzer> empty
[14:34] <slyon> looks like jaraco didn't make it this cycle, and the python-autocommand dependency got demoted back to universe for Lunar
[14:34] <cpaelzer> (so far my plan works)
[14:34] <cpaelzer> yep slyon
[14:34] <cpaelzer> I mean, that was to be expected since no one doubled down on it
[14:34] <slyon> yes
[14:34] <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
[14:34] <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
[14:34] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:35] <cpaelzer> no updates since 11th April (last weeks meeting)
[14:35] <cpaelzer> we have assigned a few last week, so let us see if they are in the security queue already
[14:35] <cpaelzer> but first
[14:35] <cpaelzer> PRs/issues to the process
[14:35] <cpaelzer> #topic Process/Documentation improvements
[14:35] <cpaelzer> Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues
[14:35] <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls
[14:35] <cpaelzer> #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues
[14:35] <cpaelzer> 2x none
[14:35] <cpaelzer> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue
[14:35] <cpaelzer> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable?
[14:35] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:35] <cpaelzer> Internal link
[14:35] <cpaelzer> - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect
[14:35] <cpaelzer> - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much
[14:35] <cpaelzer> #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594
[14:36] <sarnold> I don't believe we've made progress on any of these items this week, our resources have been focused on other priorities
[14:36] <cpaelzer> yeah
[14:36] <cpaelzer> that is - for once - ok sarnold
[14:37] <sarnold> for now, heh :)
[14:37] <cpaelzer> as no one has expected those cases to make it into 23.04 anyway
[14:37] <slyon> ACK
[14:37] <cpaelzer> slyon: last weeks mentioning of heif made me check the state of HDR support
[14:37] <cpaelzer> do not check it yourself, sad story
[14:37] <sarnold> heh :(
[14:37] <cpaelzer> might be a while until I can buy new screens
[14:37] <cpaelzer> so this might be the release week meeting we all hoped for
[14:38] <cpaelzer> quick, effective, nothing to do
[14:38] <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
[14:38] <slyon> cpaelzer: okay... let me put that on Foundations' internal roadmap plan for libheif
[14:38] <sarnold> I do have a hopefully quick question
[14:38] <sarnold> re jaraco et al
[14:38] <cpaelzer> sarnold: go
[14:38] <sarnold> are those in lunar-proposed or are they in devel-proposed?
[14:38] <cpaelzer> slyon: it is the desktop that needs to be able to display, even once you have the lib
[14:38] <slyon> cpaelzer: understood
[14:38] <cpaelzer> slyon: but having the lib and diplsaing normal-dr is better than not displaying it at all
[14:39] <sarnold> or, what keeps those from "promoting to main" via usual -proposed seven day aging thing?
[14:39] <slyon> right
[14:39] <sarnold> .. post release
[14:39] <cpaelzer> sarnold: the component mismatch holds them back
[14:39] <sarnold> cpaelzer: yay
[14:39] <cpaelzer> that is always a barrier to pass even on SRUs
[14:40] <cpaelzer> and furthermore the release team usually clears remaining proposed IIRFC
[14:40] <cpaelzer> IIRC
[14:40] <cpaelzer> they either go in, or they go away
[14:40] <slyon> sarnold: also I think they are in "devel-proposed" (which doesn't really exist).. basically will be moved to "mm-proposed" once that exists
[14:40] <cpaelzer> I've never seen a release go out with things in proposed not meant to be zero-day SRUs
[14:40] <cpaelzer> this is release team magic which I haven't been part of
[14:40] <sarnold> *nod* same here, always on the edges :)
[14:41] <cpaelzer> but we never had to care about cases like this because they are doing great
[14:41] <sarnold> *nod*
[14:41] <sarnold> and sometimes I get to wondering how those things get enforced :)
[14:41] <sarnold> thanks for the reassurance :)
[14:41] <cpaelzer> yw
[14:41] <cpaelzer> anything else?
[14:41] <sarnold> are we skipping next week's?
[14:42] <cpaelzer> some of us I guess, but I do not know how to announce
[14:42] <cpaelzer> so I'd say, those who can join
[14:42] <cpaelzer> and see if there is anything
[14:42] <cpaelzer> and will quickly be over
[14:42] <didrocks> hopefully as quickly as this one :)
[14:42] <cpaelzer> for anyone external - the majority of people will be on a sprint next and even more in the week after
[14:42] <cpaelzer> hence expect low participation here
[14:42] <cpaelzer> good
[14:42] <cpaelzer> I'd call this done for now then
[14:42] <cpaelzer> any last words?
[14:43] <sarnold> thanks cpaelzer, all :)
[14:43] <slyon> thanks, all!
[14:43] <cpaelzer> thank you all!
[14:43] <cpaelzer> #endmeeting
[14:43] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 14:43:12 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-04-18-14.32.moin.txt
[14:43] <joalif> thanks cpaelzer,all :)
[14:43] <eslerm> o/
[14:43] <didrocks> thanks!