[07:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Unity Desktop amd64 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+icicle [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+nezha [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive2 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+licheerv [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Ubuntu WSL [Lunar Final] has been updated (4753146026)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: 34 entries have been added, updated or disabled
[15:05] <dust> iso is 4,9gb and dvd rw is 4,7gb
 Usb installer? Or use the mini installer at the https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-mini-iso/daily-live/20230414
 What is missing right now is a link to the mini on the official download page for 23.04
[15:09] <dust> found legacy at https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lunar/release/ but most who need a dvd will run into troubles
 Yes on there you will see a legacy which uses the installer that existed before ubiquity and the download size is about 1GB less so it will work fine on a dvd.
 Correction: Before UDI. (re @luisalvarado: Yes on there you will see a legacy which uses the installer that existed before ubiquity and the download size is about 1GB less so it will work fine on a dvd.)
 Correction is correct.
 Lol
[15:16] <dust> UDI?
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: 34 entries have been added, updated or disabled
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-quality- Builds: 34 entries have been added, updated or disabled
[15:42] <luna> and Phoronix and Distrowatch being early again as always :P
[15:47] <luna> writing Ubuntu 23.04 and flavours is released just becouse its at the Canonical London datacenter, that are still mirroring the file out for another 2,5-3,5 hours but when people download the file from the London DC that does the mirroring job it slows down the actual release and make it take 6-9 hours or 9-13 hours instead of 3 hours total always happends
[15:48] <luna> its nice when the Linux news sites slows down the mirroring process (and it always happens)
[16:13] <luna> downloading with QBitorrent seems to work better then KTorrent and only takes 2 hours instead of 2 days now
 Yes and also much better than transmission. Has always been the case for me for I think more than 5 years now.
[16:16] <luna> https://i.imgur.com/QWDDl8t.png
[16:48] <luna> and bam Ubuntu 23.04 is offically out: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2023-April/000289.html
[17:05] <luna> flashing it on the Ubuntu USB stick i got from Philipp Kewisch at this years FOSDEM now
[17:18] <luna>  there we go now we have Ubuntu 23.04 :)
 Okay just did the first gravitymark test for 4k. It jumped from 53232 Points (Ubuntu 22.10) to 55489 Points (Ubuntu 23.04). A 4% increase in performance at 4K.
 082
 9782
 :)   (I have no real idea what those figures are, but I gather its good...) (re @luisalvarado: Okay just did the first gravitymark test for 4k. It jumped from 53232 Points (Ubuntu 22.10) to 55489 Points (Ubuntu 23.04). A 4% increase in performance at 4K.)
 Am happy to join this group, I love Ubuntu mate though last year release was booting for more than 5 minutes when mint took less than 2 mins, I will download Ubuntu mate tomorrow and give the results after testing
 Welcome to the group.  Ubuntu MATE 23.04 will have just released in fact. (re @Kailanya: Am happy to join this group, I love Ubuntu mate though last year release was booting for more than 5 minutes when mint took less than 2 mins, I will download Ubuntu mate tomorrow and give the results after testing)
 Means, the performance of nvidia (at least which is I am testing) has gone up on the gravitymark benchmark between 22.10 and 23.04 (re @guiverc: :)   (I have no real idea what those figures are, but I gather its good...))
 https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/leaderboard/?size=4k&mode=one&offset=1
 That
[17:40] <guiverc> :)
 Hope booting time is shortened and errors fixed (re @guiverc: Welcome to the group.  Ubuntu MATE 23.04 will have just released in fact.)
 just keep in mind that there's always "errors" on every release, and there's different types of problems that arise during the interim releases.  So don't hold it against Ubuntu or any of the flavor teams if there *are* issues remaining.