[00:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curl (lunar-proposed/main) [7.88.1-8ubuntu1 => 7.88.1-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[01:32] <guiverc> Question:  I realize focus is currently on lunar/23.04; but does the release team intend a 18.04 EOSS warning like https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2021-March/000266.html  (16.04's) .... (I'm wanting something to post to fridge thus this request; I realize 18.04's EOSS is now may-2023)
[03:39] <rs2009> gm everyone :) marked Ubuntu Unity as ready
[03:39] <rs2009> AlsoItzSwirlz: tysm!
[07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kbuild (lunar-proposed/universe) [1:0.1.9998svn3589+dfsg-1~build1 => 1:0.1.9998svn3589+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kbuild [sync] (lunar-proposed) [1:0.1.9998svn3589+dfsg-1]
[07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (lunar-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.6-1 => 7.0.8-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (lunar-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.6-dfsg-1 => 7.0.8-dfsg-1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud) (sync)
[07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [sync] (lunar-proposed) [7.0.8-1]
[07:30] <LocutusOfBorg> sadly 11 CVEs are fixed with vbox 7.0.8 ^^
[07:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (lunar-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.6-dfsg-1 => 7.0.8-dfsg-1ubuntu1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud)
[07:57] <LocutusOfBorg> bdmurray, ^^ I added SRU information, can you please have another look?
[07:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Unity Desktop amd64 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[07:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (lunar-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.6-dfsg-1ubuntu1.23.04.1 => 7.0.8-dfsg-1ubuntu1.23.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[08:27] <sil2100> Marking preinstalled server (pi and riscv64) as ready per feedback from waveform and xypron
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+icicle [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+licheerv [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+nezha [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive2 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:28] <sil2100> philroche_, toabctl: hey! From earlier messages I assume we're all good cloud-wise for release, right?
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[08:33] <sil2100> Wimpy: heeey! How's the state of Ubuntu MATE? Can we mark as ready?
[08:33] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, hello, is virtualbox (lunar-proposed/multiverse) [7.0.6-dfsg-1 => 7.0.8-dfsg-1ubuntu1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud) an issue for iso spin?
[08:33] <sil2100> RikMills: how about Kubuntu?
[08:34] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: no
[08:34] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks, I don't remember how "ubuntu-cloud" relates to iso, I see something on mail list recently
[08:34] <LocutusOfBorg> I hope we can get vbox into lunar then :D
[08:35] <sil2100> What's displayed there is the packageset, which doesn't really correlate much with seeds and such
[08:36] <sil2100> But yeah, this will be handled as an sru when there's time
[08:57] <toabctl> sil2100, yes, cloud looks good
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (lunar-proposed) [1:23.04.6]
[09:11] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks a lot! it would be nice if ubottu or queuebot could also report result of "seeded-in-ubuntu", what do you think? :)
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[09:38] <sil2100> Yaaay!
[09:38] <sil2100> Wimpy (I suppose that was you): thanks!
[09:38] <sil2100> Now only Kubuntu left
[09:52] <tsimonq2> sil2100: I'm going to green flag Kubuntu but these days lack the permissions to push Buttons.
[09:53] <tsimonq2> (That is, unless RikMills chimes in soon.)
[10:06] <seb128> hum, I just noticed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2016902
[10:06] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2016902 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[oem] No desktop shortcut for 'Prepare for shipping to end users' on 23.04 Legacy" [Low, Triaged]
[10:06] <seb128> it's not a blocker but I wonder if Jeremy should have marked that as test fail for oem mode
[10:07] <seb128> checking what's going on it seems https://git.launchpad.net/ubiquity/tree/scripts/plugininstall.py#n1350 is being called before oem-config is installed on the target and such the file_exist check fails and the .desktop isn't copied
[10:07] <seb128> is that a new problem? the code didn't seem to change much in recent cycles...
[10:09] <seb128> a stack of KDE packages also  seems also to get installed on the target system by ubiquity?
[10:12] <seb128> yes, plasma is available as a session on the install system, wth
[10:23] <seb128> sil2100, ^ anyone from release having a clue/opinion about that?
[10:24] <seb128> I know oem isn't that important on non LTS and I'm not asking for a respin but still it sucks and I would feel better if we had some understanding of the problem
[10:24] <seb128> we should also probably release not it
[10:26] <sil2100> seb128: dbungert will try looking into it
[10:27] <sil2100> A bit unfortunate this one slipped through when we were looking at the test results
[10:38] <seb128> sil2100, indeed...
[10:38] <seb128> dbungert, sil2100, thanks!
[10:38] <sil2100> I think we all concentrated a bit too much on the new installer
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu WSL [Lunar Final] has been updated (4753146026)
[10:38] <sil2100> Oh well
[10:39] <sil2100> tsimonq2: thanks, I'll mark it!
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (kinetic-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-1 => 6.1.44-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.10.1] (no packageset)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (kinetic-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-dfsg-3 => 6.1.44-dfsg-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.10.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (kinetic-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-1 => 6.1.44-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.10.1] (no packageset)
[10:48] <GunnarHj> dbungert: Re your ping about CJK testing: While I most certainly will be involved in the resolution of the bugs found, I'm disinclined to run the new installer with a language I don't understand.
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (kinetic-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-dfsg-3ubuntu1.22.10.1 => 6.1.44-dfsg-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.10.1] (kernel-dkms)
[10:49] <dbungert> GunnarHj: fair enough, thank you :)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Lunar Final] has been marked as ready
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1 => 6.1.44-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.22.04.1 => 6.1.44-dfsg-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud)
[10:52] <sil2100> hm, I think we're ready for release now basically
[10:53] <toabctl> 🎉
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.22.04.1 => 6.1.44-dfsg-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[10:53] <sil2100> I'm thinking of starting the process in a bit, considering that the mirror syncing will take a while still
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (jammy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-1~ubuntu1.22.04.1 => 6.1.44-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu22.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1 => 6.1.44-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1 => 6.1.44-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu20.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:55] <toabctl> sil2100, can CPC start triggering builds for the release already? or should we still wait a bit?
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.20.04.1 => 6.1.44-dfsg-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu20.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.38-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.20.04.1 => 6.1.44-dfsg-1~ubuntu1~ubuntu20.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud)
[11:02] <sil2100> toabctl: hm, let's wait a moment more
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tepl [source] (lunar-proposed) [6.4.0-7ubuntu1]
[11:17] <bdmurray> seb128: I accepted tepl
[11:20] <sil2100> toabctl: ok, you can start triggering the builds!
[11:23] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks
[11:24] <seb128> @dbungert, do you still plan to investigate a bit the oem mode issue or should we just assume that ubiquity will go away next cycle and since we will not respin/do new ISO builds for Lunar there is no point?
[11:27] <dbungert> seb128: so I think the point of this sort of test is to not let a big pile of OEM specific bugs all show up at LTS time.  But as the plan is to not use that codebase anyhow for OEM, then it is counterproductive to try to fix it.  We should put that energy instead into getting the new installer ready for OEM.
[11:28] <seb128> dbungert, right, I would have just felt better understanding the issue to be able to release note an accurate description/potential workaround in 23.10
[11:28] <seb128> like if there is any hack people could do on the live system or preseed or something to avoid having another desktop pulled in
[11:30] <toabctl> sil2100, ack
[12:25] <dbungert> seb128: I am looking into the plasma-desktop angle
[12:26] <sil2100> Release publishing almost there
[12:42] <sil2100> Ok, images published, mirrors will start syncing shortly!
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: 34 entries have been added, updated or disabled
[13:17] <sil2100> Ok, torrents seem to be good
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdm3 (jammy-proposed/main) [42.0-1ubuntu7.22.04.1 => 42.0-1ubuntu7.22.04.2] (desktop-core)
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (lunar-proposed/main) [1.2.6.3-1ubuntu8 => 1.2.6.3-1ubuntu9] (core)
[13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (kinetic-proposed/main) [1.2.6.3-1ubuntu4.2 => 1.2.6.3-1ubuntu4.3] (core)
[13:39] <seb128> dbungert, thanks
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (jammy-proposed/main) [1.2.6.3-1ubuntu1.5 => 1.2.6.3-1ubuntu1.6] (core)
[14:07] <ahasenack> bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-characters/+bug/2016708 is good to go
[14:07] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2016708 in gnome-characters (Ubuntu) "Characters search through GNOME Shell is broken 😿" [High, Fix Committed]
[14:14] <bdmurray> ahasenack: okay, will accept
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-characters [source] (lunar-proposed) [44.0-4]
[14:56] <sil2100> \o/
[15:21] <toabctl> sil2100, cloud publication looks good so far. some things still missing but it should be all good in the next hours.
[15:25] <jchittum> we may have an issue with riscv build today. debugging
[15:27] <jchittum> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/KXNwyxXdFG/
[15:28] <jchittum> what's puzzling is this worked just fine yesterday _and_ all other arches are happy
[15:29] <sil2100> \o/
[15:29] <AlsoItzSwirlz> \o/
[15:29] <sil2100> Thank you everyone for your hard work this release!
[15:29] <sil2100> So many new flavors, oh my
[15:29] <AlsoItzSwirlz> <3
[15:29] <AlsoItzSwirlz> ill have release notes for cinnamon in about an hour
[15:37] <xnox> jchittum:  yes, but in the runup to the release it was flaky on riscv64 builds of preinstalled server
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: 34 entries have been added, updated or disabled
[15:41] <AlsoItzSwirlz> time for the..
[15:41] <AlsoItzSwirlz> 23.10 Mickey Mouse
[15:42] <sil2100> hahah
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: 34 entries have been added, updated or disabled
[15:42] <luna> and Phoronix and Distrowatch being early again as always :P
[15:45] <jchittum> checking CPC builds, we've found 1 failure with this in the past 2 weeks. so it has happened, but not regularly for us. So we'll just keep hammering rebuild till it goes through
[15:47] <luna> writing Ubuntu 23.04 and flavours is released just becouse its at the Canonical London datacenter, that are still mirroring the file out for another 2,5-3,5 hours but when people download the file from the London DC that does the mirroring job it slows down the actual release and make it take 6-9 hours or 9-13 hours instead of 3 hours total always happends
[15:48] <luna> its nice when the Linux news sites slows down the mirroring process (and it always happens)
[15:49] <ricotz> \o/
[16:13] <luna> downloading with QBitorrent seems to work better then KTorrent and only takes 2 hours instead of 2 days now
[16:14] <cjwatson> luna: At least we don't normally take down the Norwegian weather service any more
[16:14] <luna> cjwatson: o: what have i now missed?
[16:14] <cjwatson> it was a long time ago, edgy or so
[16:14] <luna> oh
[16:15] <cjwatson> a lot of the release traffic was pushed off to se.archive.ubuntu.com because they had lots of academic bandwidth
[16:15] <cjwatson> and we heard on the grapevine a while later that the amount of traffic we pushed through Scandinavia had temporarily broken the national Norwegian weather service (if memory hasn't mangled that anecdote too badly)
[16:16] <luna> https://i.imgur.com/QWDDl8t.png
[16:16] <luna> cjwatson: oh oof :D
[16:48] <luna> and bam Ubuntu 23.04 is offically out: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2023-April/000289.html
[17:02] <mdeslaur> congrats release team!
[17:05] <luna> flashing it on the Ubuntu USB stick i got from Philipp Kewisch at this years FOSDEM now
[17:18] <luna>  there we go now we have Ubuntu 23.04 :)
[18:20] <ahasenack> ubuntu-release, bdmurray: please reject mutter from lunar-unapproved due do https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1987976/comments/90 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1987976/comments/91
[18:21] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1987976 in mutter (Ubuntu) "firefox black window on wayland" [High, In Progress]
[18:24] <ahasenack> ubuntu-release, bdmurray: please reject curl from lunar-unapproved due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curl/+bug/2016439/comments/2
[18:24] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2016439 in curl (Ubuntu) "Regression finding system certificates" [High, In Progress]
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected curl [source] (lunar-proposed) [7.88.1-8ubuntu2]
[18:49] <ginggs> ahasenack: ^
[18:49] <ahasenack> thx, and mutter too please
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mutter [source] (lunar-proposed) [44.0-2ubuntu5]
[18:56] <ginggs> ahasenack: ^
[18:56] <ahasenack> thx!
[18:56] <sergiodj> ahasenack: FWIW I'm building the new curl, will test it, and then upload if everything is fine
[18:57] <ahasenack> ok
[19:42] <jchittum> cpc riscv builds have finally played nicely. so the final push for stuff is happening. all the other places are looking green
[19:42] <jchittum> just cloud-images.ubuntu.com lagging a bit
[19:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curl (lunar-proposed/main) [7.88.1-8ubuntu1 => 7.88.1-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:54] <sergiodj> ahasenack: ^ curl uploaded
[19:55] <LocutusOfBorg> congrats for the release!!!
[20:20] <arraybolt3> Sigh, it's done.
[20:20] <arraybolt3> Guess now we wait for the archive to open again.
[20:26] <ahasenack> release team, please reject curl from lunar-proposed, version 7.88.1-8ubuntu2, reason: "should also define DEB_TARGET_MULTIARCH in d/rules"
[20:27] <ahasenack> (I'm doing lunar srus, but I can't touch the unapproved queue yet, as it's still considered the devel release)
[21:03] <ahasenack> LocutusOfBorg: you synced and uploaded virtualbox, are they the same?
[21:03] <ahasenack> 7.0.8-dfsg-1 and then 7.0.8-dfsg-1ubuntu1 are both in lunar unapproved
[21:08] <LocutusOfBorg> ahasenack, one has SRU information in changelog :/
[21:09] <ahasenack> LocutusOfBorg: we don't need the sync then, right
[21:09] <ahasenack> (not that I can reject it)
[21:10] <LocutusOfBorg> correct I syncd all of them together, something ended in unapproved
[21:10] <ahasenack> -guest-additions-iso 7.0.8-1 is in lunar already, that task can be fix released?
[21:10] <ahasenack> same for -ext-pack? fix released?
[21:11] <ahasenack> talking about bug #2017101
[21:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2017101 in virtualbox-hwe (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] virtualbox 7.0.8 and 6.1.44" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2017101
[21:11] <ahasenack> the tasks there
[21:12] <LocutusOfBorg> sure
[21:13] <ahasenack> can these packages work together at different versions like this?
[21:13] <ahasenack> oh, wait, something is in proposed
[21:14] <LocutusOfBorg> yes
[21:14] <ahasenack>  virtualbox-guest-additions-iso | 7.0.8-1 is in lunar
[21:14] <ahasenack> so that's fix released