| LocutusOfBorg | hello, good morning. I'm thinking about syncingpackage -f webkit2gtk. It takes two days to build on riscv64, and causes uninstallabilities of some packages. Doing it during archive opening might be a good idea | 07:17 |
|---|---|---|
| LocutusOfBorg | please let me know | 07:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (its built successfully already in my ppa for riscv64) | 07:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkit2gtk (mantic-proposed/main) [2.40.0-3ubuntu1 => 2.40.1-1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 07:18 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | (also pkgconf, now it has a *real* testsuite running on every architecture and passing!) | 07:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkgconf (mantic-proposed/main) [1.8.1-1ubuntu2 => 1.8.1-2] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 07:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected hibagent [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-0ubuntu2.20.04.1] | 07:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lto-disabled-list (mantic-proposed/main) [39 => 40] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 08:54 | |
| slyon | Hey, I'm proposing to get lto-disabled-list 40 (from my +1 PPA) into "devel" early, to avoid any conflicts. ^ see my +1 report for context: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2023-April/042551.html | 08:58 |
| schopin | Since those are fixes for lunar FTBFS, should the lto-disabled-list also be SRUed? | 09:21 |
| slyon | eztrace needs additional fixes (in llvm-toolchain), clasp is a universe FTBFS in lunar-proposed.. not sure how we handle those? I suppose it could eventually be SRUed. | 09:28 |
| slyon | So far we didn't do any lto-disabled-list SRUs, though (since Jammy). | 09:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (focal-proposed/main) [15.2.17-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 15.2.17-0ubuntu0.20.04.3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 09:52 | |
| vorlon | slyon, schopin: honestly I think the continued use of lto-disabled-list is dubious; the package doesn't exist in Debian, and now that Debian supports DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=optimization=+lto, per-package overrides belong upstreamed in Debian | 10:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, what about per-package-and-arch overrides (thinking w.r.t. cmake and s390x) | 10:25 |
| slyon | vorlon: I agree. But Debian doesn't enable LTO by default, so they might not be as interested in accepting an "optimization=-lto" patch. I tried anyway: https://bugs.debian.org/1034521 -- lto-disabled-list helps in such cases to avoid unnecessary delta | 10:26 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1034521 in clasp "clasp: FTBFS with LTO enabled" [Minor, Open] | 10:26 | |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: what do you mean? DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS can be arch-specific | 10:28 |
| vorlon | slyon: it's forward-looking - the expectation is that Debian will be moving to LTO by default in the next release | 10:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, I mean instead of patching cmake to disable lto on s390x, to add it to lto-disabled-list | 10:29 |
| vorlon | anyway, no reason to care about Debian delta in an SRU | 10:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm not huge fan of introducing lto delta :) | 10:30 |
| vorlon | then why have it as a delta instead of submitted to Debian | 10:30 |
| vorlon | I'm not a huge fan of having an obscure centralized list of overrides that is not obvious to onlookers | 10:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | meh, ask uploader of delta not me :D | 10:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I usually add lto delta after opening upstream bugs | 10:30 |
| LocutusOfBorg | because I also don't like that overrides list | 10:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | slyon, maybe LP: #2015872 can be upstreamed? | 10:31 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2015872 in cmake (Ubuntu) "FTBFS due to LTO on s390x" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2015872 | 10:31 | |
| slyon | LocutusOfBorg: we have a MIR rules for packages in main: https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/blob/main/README.md?plain=1#L801 LTO delta should be in the package, not in lto-disabled-list | 10:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | slyon, this makes sense | 10:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but maybe fixing upstream is preferrable? | 10:32 |
| slyon | for cmake it's a bit weird. I missed the lto-disabled-list when patching it for s390x. I should probably try to upstream the delta for all the architectures | 10:32 |
| slyon | LocutusOfBorg: https://bugs.debian.org/1034873 | 10:56 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1034873 in cmake "cmake: FTBFS with LTO enabled on many architectures" [Minor, Open] | 10:56 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | I was thinking to report here instead https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues | 10:56 |
| slyon | I wanted to do that next :) | 10:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks, hopefully for next minor release will be back in sync :D | 10:58 |
| zhsj | All the golang packages can be dropped if you're interested in reducing the list size | 11:53 |
| zhsj | (for lto-disabled-list) | 11:55 |
| slyon | wrt CMake: https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/24855 | 12:05 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Issue 24855 in cmake/cmake "Build failure when LTO is enabled" [Opened] | 12:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (kinetic-proposed/main) [20220622.00-0ubuntu2 => 20230330.00-0ubuntu1~22.10.0] (core) | 12:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (kinetic-proposed/main) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.1 => 2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.2] (core) | 12:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (jammy-proposed/main) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 2023c-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (core) | 12:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (jammy-proposed/main) [20220622.00-0ubuntu2~22.04.0 => 20230330.00-0ubuntu1~22.04.0] (core) | 12:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (focal-proposed/main) [2023c-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 2023c-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (core) | 12:55 | |
| utkarsh2102 | jbicha: hey, you added LP: #2015760 as "Known Issues" for Kinetic (and probably for Lunar, too) but it was meant for Lunar only, I guess. Dropped it from Kinetic. :) | 13:00 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2015760 in libadwaita-1 (Ubuntu) "Accessibility is much worse in GNOME apps that have switched to GTK4" [Critical, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2015760 | 13:00 | |
| jbicha | utkarsh2102: it affects Kinetic also because it's libadwaita that hasn't implemented what it needs to. Jammy isn't really affected because we have almost zero libadwaita apps there | 13:31 |
| bdrung | please drop the unapproved tzdata SRUs. I found another related inconsistency. | 14:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: msmtp (lunar-proposed/universe) [1.8.23-1 => 1.8.23-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 16:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (kinetic-proposed/main) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.1 => 2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.2] (core) | 16:21 | |
| bdrung | here come the new ones ^ | 16:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks, hopefully for next minor release will be back in sync :D | 17:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (jammy-proposed/main) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 2023c-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (core) | 17:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (focal-proposed/main) [2023c-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 2023c-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (core) | 18:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (focal-proposed) [2023c-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] | 18:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (jammy-proposed) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] | 18:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (kinetic-proposed) [2023c-0ubuntu0.22.10.2] | 18:07 | |
| bdrung | Thanks. Can someone drop apport 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.29 from bionic unapproved (superseded by security update) | 18:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (bionic-proposed/main) [2023c-0ubuntu0.18.04 => 2023c-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (core) | 18:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mdadm [source] (kinetic-proposed) [4.2-3ubuntu2] | 18:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (kinetic-proposed/main) [4.2-3ubuntu1 => 4.2-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 18:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mdadm [source] (jammy-proposed) [4.2-0ubuntu2] | 18:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (jammy-proposed/main) [4.2-0ubuntu1 => 4.2-0ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 18:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curl (lunar-proposed/main) [7.88.1-8ubuntu1 => 7.88.1-8ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 19:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (mantic-proposed/main) [23.04.8 => 23.04.9] (ubuntu-desktop) | 19:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (mantic-proposed/main) [1.0.128+nmu2ubuntu1 => 1.0.128+nmu2ubuntu2] (desktop-core) | 21:01 | |
| utkarsh2102 | jbicha: yes, but putting it in the release notes isn't really the right place, I think? | 21:05 |
| utkarsh2102 | this bug was opened on 2023-04-10. | 21:06 |
| utkarsh2102 | way after the kinetic release :) | 21:06 |
| utkarsh2102 | so putting it in the release notes had us a bit puzzled. | 21:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (mantic-proposed/main) [2.116.3ubuntu1 => 2.116.3ubuntu2] (core) | 21:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vim (mantic-proposed/main) [2:9.0.1000-4ubuntu3 => 2:9.0.1378-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 21:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (focal-proposed/universe) [20220622.00-0ubuntu2~20.04.2 => 20230330.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.0] (no packageset) | 22:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (bionic-proposed/universe) [20220622.00-0ubuntu2~18.04.1 => 20230330.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset) | 22:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-osconfig-agent (kinetic-proposed/main) [20220824.00-0ubuntu1~22.10.1 => 20230330.00-0ubuntu1~22.10.0] (core) | 22:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-osconfig-agent (jammy-proposed/main) [20220824.00-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 => 20230330.00-0ubuntu1~22.04.0] (core) | 22:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-osconfig-agent (focal-proposed/universe) [20220824.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 20230330.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.0] (no packageset) | 23:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-osconfig-agent (bionic-proposed/universe) [20220824.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 20230330.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset) | 23:09 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!