| xypron | I am looking for a sponsor for LP #2019122 - An autopkgtest failure is resolved by adding an upstream patch to the tests. | 08:06 |
|---|---|---|
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2019122 in umockdev (Ubuntu) "Autopkgtest failure" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2019122 | 08:06 | |
| danilogondolfo | Looking for a sponsor for LP #2018684 :) it's a sync | 09:52 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2018684 in bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) "Sync bsdmainutils 12.1.8 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2018684 | 09:53 | |
| doko | nteodosio: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/W3S2TxP5zp/ | 11:31 |
| nteodosio | doko, you may want to go ahead with ubuntu-bug chromium. | 11:35 |
| nteodosio | doko, and if you want extra shots, one is --disable-gpu and the other is the beta channel (as it is in core22). | 11:43 |
| ahasenack | coreycb: hi, for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heat/+bug/2012073 do we also need a "plain" jammy and kinetic verification? I see verification reports for what looks like the cloud archive, not plain ubuntu | 13:20 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2012073 in heat (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] SwiftSignalHandle fails due to python2-3 decode error" [High, Fix Committed] | 13:20 | |
| coreycb | ahasenack: that's a good question and it's not too clear in the results. kinetic-zed is actually plain kinetic and jammy-yoga is plain jammy. | 13:22 |
| ahasenack | but the binary packages used for the testing are different | 13:22 |
| ahasenack | the UCA ones have the ~cloud0 suffix | 13:22 |
| ahasenack | jammy-yoga looks ok indeed, no cloud-archive involved | 13:23 |
| ahasenack | ok, and so does kinetic-zed | 13:24 |
| bdmurray | sergiodj: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/2023-May/005248.html | 16:04 |
| sergiodj | bdmurray: thanks. I | 16:05 |
| sergiodj | I'll grab something to eat now, will check later | 16:05 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!