[08:06] <xypron> I am looking for a sponsor for LP #2019122 - An autopkgtest failure is resolved by adding an upstream patch to the tests.
[08:06] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2019122 in umockdev (Ubuntu) "Autopkgtest failure" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2019122
[09:52] <danilogondolfo> Looking for a sponsor for LP #2018684 :) it's a sync
[09:53] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2018684 in bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) "Sync bsdmainutils 12.1.8 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2018684
[11:31] <doko> nteodosio: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/W3S2TxP5zp/
[11:35] <nteodosio> doko, you may want to go ahead with ubuntu-bug chromium.
[11:43] <nteodosio> doko, and if you want extra shots, one is --disable-gpu and the other is the beta channel (as it is in core22).
[13:20] <ahasenack> coreycb: hi, for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heat/+bug/2012073 do we also need a "plain" jammy and kinetic verification? I see verification reports for what looks like the cloud archive,  not plain ubuntu
[13:20] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2012073 in heat (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] SwiftSignalHandle fails due to python2-3 decode error" [High, Fix Committed]
[13:22] <coreycb> ahasenack: that's a good question and it's not too clear in the results. kinetic-zed is actually plain kinetic and jammy-yoga is plain jammy.
[13:22] <ahasenack> but the binary packages used for the testing are different
[13:22] <ahasenack> the UCA ones have the ~cloud0 suffix
[13:23] <ahasenack> jammy-yoga looks ok indeed, no cloud-archive involved
[13:24] <ahasenack> ok, and so does kinetic-zed
[16:04] <bdmurray> sergiodj: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/2023-May/005248.html
[16:05] <sergiodj> bdmurray: thanks.  I
[16:05] <sergiodj> I'll grab something to eat now, will check later