[15:01] o/ [15:01] o/ [15:01] \o [15:01] o/ [15:01] Hello o/ [15:01] o/ [15:03] o/ [15:03] * vorlon waves [15:03] o/ [15:04] o/ [15:04] #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team [15:04] Meeting started at 15:04:41 UTC. The chair is vorlon. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [15:04] Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick [15:04] #topic Lightning rounds [15:04] #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-11-may-2023/35679/6 [15:05] giving everybody some time to read through and ask questions [15:05] oops, wrong link [15:05] #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-11-may-2023/35679 [15:05] mateus-morais: I think your status went to the last discourse post, not this week's [15:06] o/ [15:06] Yep, fixed it already :) [15:07] aha ok [15:07] "man in hat sits on chair" - lol [15:08] haha [15:10] everybody had enough time? [15:10] #topic Release incoming bugs [15:10] #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ll-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:10] I made -mm- yesterday [15:11] LP: #2012698 [15:11] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2012698 in plymouth (Ubuntu) "Plymouth is stuck on a plain black screen" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2012698 [15:11] this? https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:12] indeed [15:12] bdmurray: thanks, should I drop -ll- from the script going forward? [15:12] Well we might need to do some SRUs there [15:12] ok [15:12] looks like vanvugt is taking care of that plymouth bug [15:12] yeah the above is a class of issue usually handled in the Desktop Team, nothing for us [15:13] http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:13] #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-mm-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:13] LP: #2016471 [15:13] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2016471 in eztrace (Ubuntu) "eztrace FTBFS with LTO" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2016471 [15:13] I created that one.. [15:14] I'd like the toolchain squad to have a look into it. libomp.so is broken when llvm-toolchain is built with LTO [15:14] slyon: do you expect the fix to be on the eztrace side? that's the task you have in progress [15:14] ah [15:14] the upstream maintainer of eztrace suggested there might be a workaround possible in the upstream project, but didn't get back to be about it yet [15:14] that seems like an appropriate thing for us to take [15:14] shall I target it? [15:15] (doing) [15:15] so either reaching out to trahay about a eztrace fix or fixing llvm-toolchain are appropriate [15:16] there may be other packages affected by libomp though [15:16] (or other third-party projects) [15:16] LP: #2018721 [15:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2018721 in netkit-telnet-ssl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] netkit-telnet-ssl vs. inetutils-telnet" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2018721 [15:16] dviererbe: can you comment on that ^ [15:17] Well I put the summary in the LP ticket [15:20] my $.02 is that there aren't advantages that are worth the switching costs [15:21] dviererbe: are you ok with us declining it on that basis? [15:22] yeah, works for me. I just wanted to have a discussion about investigating this. [15:22] ok thanks [15:24] #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:24] LP: #1999345 [15:24] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 1999345 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "please add luks2 module to the signed grub2 images" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1999345 [15:25] there've been discussions about this internally; I'm a strong -1 on us including this in the signed images [15:25] because the GRUB LUKS implementation is always trailing the userspace [15:26] and currently the gaps are that it doesn't support currently-recommended key derivation [15:26] juliank isn't here to argue for it, but I would just decline this one [15:26] (and let him reopen it if there are other arguments) [15:27] any objections? [15:27] sounds good. we have been waiting for any action on that one for too long [15:28] My watch made brr with IRC notification! I'm +1 [15:28] hah [15:28] #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs [15:29] LP: #2015355 [15:29] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2015355 in util-linux (Ubuntu) "Please backport patches for false atari partition detection to Ubuntu 20.04" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2015355 [15:29] this was escalated internally to us [15:29] Do we need to keep looking at Focal given Jammy is the latest LTS? [15:30] based on support team's input I would say yes it's worth fixing [15:30] or do you mean looking at the report in general for FF? [15:30] The report in general but I guess if we didn't we wouldn't have known about this. ;-) [15:30] right [15:30] I am planning on working that one, bdmurray pinged me about it before the sprint [15:31] I mean, we did have the internal discussion, but that's different than ensuring it's tracked [15:31] so I'll go ahead and target this one [15:32] ok that's it for bugs [15:32] let's see if I can speed things up a bit from here :) [15:32] #topic Team proposed-migration report [15:33] #link https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs [15:33] dviererbe: would you mind looking at git? hopefully just needs a retry of linux-lowlatency/arm64 autopkgtest [15:34] I can do that [15:34] argon2 vs cryptsetup: I've looked at this before, argon2 declares versioned breaks: on cryptsetup so this needs solved by a cryptsetup merge. Any volunteers? [15:34] bdrung did the last merge but he's not here today [15:35] adrien: maybe you? [15:35] if not, I could take it [15:35] fakeroot: enr0n? [15:35] vorlon: sure [15:36] pygments: ogayot? [15:36] vorlon: ack [15:36] vorlon: I can look at that [15:36] and then that's it, because 7 was actually 5 because of the double counting of blocked/blocking [15:36] adrien: thanks [15:36] ah, 4 [15:37] sbuild also blocking postfix; I'll take that one, it's probably a britney hint issue [15:38] yeah turns out that when postfix fails to configure on amd64 due to weird infra, all the autopkgtests of its reverse-dependencies fail [15:38] #topic AOB [15:38] anything else? [15:39] vorlon: postfix is what I previously looked at. [15:39] * vorlon nods [15:39] Should I try to create a patch for that one. [15:39] I'll be off next Thursday (national holiday) and Friday (swap day) [15:39] same for me ^ [15:40] oh, already? I'm going to be away for half of the pulse actually [15:41] I'll be off both thursday and friday [15:41] i'll be off next friday (swap day) [15:42] I'm out this afternoon and tomorrow [15:43] I have another swap day to take but haven't committed to when [15:43] around otherwise! [15:43] I have only Monday and Tuesday next week to work. [15:44] any other other business? [15:44] #endmeeting [15:44] Meeting ended at 15:44:52 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2023/ubuntu-meeting.2023-05-11-15.04.moin.txt [15:44] thanks, all!