[00:59] <tomreyn> Thanos: for a supported LTS release, yes. 20.04 LTS (the next youngest LTS) lost support in april.
 Thanos I have the latest one and I love it.
 vefi
[01:02] <tomreyn> oh, i guess i got the question wrong - if Thanos is asking whether to use an LTS (22.04 LTS) or standard release (23.04) - depends on personal preferences (longer support duration vs more recent software).
 I feel like both are somewhat short term with KDE 6 on the way. (Just my personal opinion)
[01:06] <tomreyn> i don't expect a new kde release to put any kubuntu release out of its planned support lifecycle.
 True. But we can always hack it :)
 "hack" lol.
 From the Kubuntu 22.04.02 LTS that i have already installed can i go to Kubuntu 23.04 or not? Is it better to stay on 22.04? I don't uses snaps on my apps i am using the native repos of Ubuntu
 And also i have put the Kubuntu backports
[05:43] <alkisg> Thanos, it's better to stay on 22.04. When 24.04 comes out, you'll be able to upgrade directly from 22.04 to 24.04.
[06:21] <shaurya> hi
 Wow i see big difference in my laptop without encryption
 Its booting so fast and i can see that it response better
[07:26] <mmikowski> Thanos: That will depend on your CPU; more current ones handle the encryption almost transparently, but earlier generations can be a lot slower.
[07:27] <mmikowski> Not sure where the cut-off line was, but by intel 9th-gen, it was pretty much transparent.
[07:27] <mmikowski> However, boot times do still get dinged by FDE.
[07:28] <mmikowski> I'm referring to the speed once everything is set up. I typically see ~10s penalty for FDE systems.
 I have 4thgen ans 6gen laptops
 On both of them i can see the difference
[07:56] <mmikowski> Thanos: That certainly sounds about right. Again, when you bump to a later processor, you might want to try again. I have benchmarks showing FDE has almost no effect on read/write on ext4 + lvm + LUKS for 10th+ gen Intel. I assume AMD is similar.
[07:56] <mmikowski> kk, peace out :)
[12:41] <BluesKaj> Hi all
 When you upgrade from one LTS version to the next one we have to disable backports repo?
[13:19] <BluesKaj> it's advisable to comment out the backports since they are so by default in the sources.list
 You mean to leave then enabled?
[13:31] <BluesKaj> no comment them out by placing # in front
[13:39] <BluesKaj> make sure you upgrade your existing packages before upgrading to the new LTS
 Some packages i saw that are provided only by backports
 Iike kalendar
[18:25] <user|44> beep
[18:25] <user|54> Hi
[18:26] <user|54> Use arch you Fag$
[20:54]  * BayouGuru uses Kubuntu, by the way...  :)
[20:54] <BayouGuru> hehe